Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 6 no. 7 (2025)

From Imbalance to Inclusion: A Quantitative Study on Gender Participation Trends in Engineering and Architecture Education (AY 2020–2025)

Chrisjay S. Torres | Peter G. Narsico

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Gender disparity remains a persistent issue in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, particularly within engineer-ing and architecture programs. While national and institutional initiatives have promoted inclusivity, localized assessments are essential to deter-mine whether these efforts translate into sustained enrolment equity. This study employed a quantitative descriptive-comparative design, drawing on institutional freshman enrolment data from Academic Year (AY) 2020–2021 to AY 2024–2025. A total of 10,052 enrolment records were ana-lyzed across multiple programs, disaggregated by gender. Descriptive statistics, visual trend analysis, and a chi-square test for trend were applied to assess gender participation over time. Findings revealed fluctuating patterns of female enrolment, with a notable increase in AY 2021–2022 (+52.1%) followed by modest growth and stabilization. While some pro-grams (e.g., Architecture, Chemical Engineering) approached gender bal-ance, others (e.g., Electrical and Mechanical Engineering) remained strongly male-dominated. The chi-square test indicated no statistically significant linear trend in female participation across years, χ²(1, N = 10,052) = 1.68, p = .196. Although there are signs of progress in selected programs, the lack of a significant trend suggests that institutional efforts toward gender inclusion have not yet resulted in consistent, system-wide change. The study highlights the need for program-specific interventions, continuous monitoring, and intentional policy implementation to address persistent enrolment disparities in STEM fields.



References:

  1. Abolle-Okoyeagu, C. J., Mahon, R., Okpu, A., & Chima-Amaeshi, N. (2024). Bridging the gender gap in engineering: Strategies for retention and advancement of women in STEM fields. International Journal of Gender and STEM, 12(4), 55–72. https://www.dpublication.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/222-9905-.pdf
  2. Bustamante-Mora, A., Diéguez-Rebolledo, M., Díaz-Arancibia, J., Sánchez-Vázquez, E., & Medina-Gómez, J. (2025). Inclusive peda-gogical models in STEM: The importance of emotional intelligence, resilience, and motivation with a gender perspective. Sustainability, 17(10), Article 4437. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104437
  3. Chen, C., Doyle, J., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2024). Shrinking gender gaps in STEM persistence: A ten-year comparison of the stability and volatility of STEM career in-terest in high school by gender. Interna-tional Journal of Science Education, 46(7), 1123–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2388880
  4. de Castro, J. J. (2023, September 7). Inclusivity, gender equality in engineering. Philip-pine Daily Inquirer. https://opinion.inquirer.net/166112/inclusivity-gender-equality-in-engineering
  5. Department of Industry, Science and Re-sources. (2024). STEM equity monitor. https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/stem-equity-monitor
  6. Ejim, D. R., & Dosunmu, A. G. (2025). Bridging gaps: The intersection of women in engi-neering and gender studies—Challenges, advances, and future directions. Discover Global Society, 3, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00184-7
  7. Evagorou, M., Puig, B., Bayram, D., & Janeckova, H. (2024). Addressing the gender gap in STEM education across ed-ucational levels. NESET Report. https://nesetweb.eu/en/resources/library/addressing-the-gender-gap-in-stem-education-in-schools/
  8. Ewim, D. R. E., & Dosunmu, A. G. (2025). Bridg-ing gaps: the intersection of women in engineering and gender studies—challenges, advances, and future direc-tions. Discover Global Society, 3(43). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44282-025-00184-7
  9. Fan, S.-L., Chai, C.-S., Lim, B. C.-Y., Lu, S.-M., & Gui, H.-C. (2024). Ameliorating the pro-found gender wage gap in the architec-ture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry among the APEC members: The could and should. Asian Journal of Busi-ness Research, 14(1), Article 240165. https://ajbr.co.nz/ajbr/ajbr240165.pdf
  10. Fernandez, D., White, S., Smith, H. C. M., Con-nor, P. M., & Ryan, M. (2023). Gender in-equality in science, technology, engineer-ing and mathematics: Gendered time dis-parities in perceived and actual time spent in practical laboratory-based activi-ties. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1194968. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1194968
  11. Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., & Hu, X. (2024). Cross-cultural patterns of gender differences in STEM: Gender stratifica-tion, gender equality, and gender-equality paradoxes. Educational Psychol-ogy Review, 36, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09872-3
  12. Meiksins, P., & Layne, P. (2022). Women in engineering: Analyzing 20 years of social science literature. Society of Women En-gineers. https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/civil-engineering-source/civil-engineering-magazine/article/2022/05/engineering-struggles-to-achieve-gender-parity
  13. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Promising practic-es for addressing the underrepresenta-tion of women in science, engineering, and medicine: Opening doors. https://doi.org/10.17226/25585
  14. Nguyen, U. (2020). Women in engineering: A review of the 2020 literature. Society of Women Engineers Magazine. https://swe.org/magazine/women-in-engineering-a-review-of-the-2020-literature/
  15. Ntombela, B., Ramabodu, M. S., & Moloi, K. (2025). Strategies for empowering and retaining women in STEM fields: A sys-tematic literature review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388855999
  16. Punzalan, C. H. (2022). STEM interests and fu-ture career perspectives of junior high school students: A gender study. Interna-tional Journal of Research in Education and Science, 8(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2537
  17. Rappler. (2023, July 5). Only 3 in 10 workers in Philippine STEM are women – LinkedIn. https://www.rappler.com/philippines/gender-gap-workers-philippine-stem-linkedin-july-2023/
  18. Ro, H. K., Fernandez, F., & Ramon, E. (Eds.). (2021). Gender equity in STEM in higher education: International perspectives on policy, institutional culture, and individu-al choice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003053217
  19. Romea, D. C. (2019). Breaking gender stereo-type: A phenomenological study of the lived experiences of female civil engi-neers in the construction field. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Re-search Abstracts, 3(2O). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/12302
  20. Tal, M., Lavi, R., Reiss, S., & Dori, Y. J. (2024). Gender perspectives on role models: In-sights from STEM students and profes-sionals. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33, 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10114-y
  21. UNESCO & International Finance Corporation (2025) – Closing the Gender Gap in Edu-cation and Employment in the Philippines Official report hosted by MSN News https://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/other/unesco-ifc-launch-global-report-on-gender-gaps-in-education-employment-in-the-philippines/ar-AA1HDRhh
  22. UNESCO & International Finance Corporation. (2025). Gender gaps in education and employment in the Philippines. https://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/other/unesco-ifc-launch-global-report-on-gender-gaps-in-education-employment-in-the-philippines/ar-AA1HDRhh
  23. UNESCO & International Finance Corporation. (2025). Gender gaps in education and employment in the Philippines. https://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/other/unesco-ifc-launch-global-report-on-gender-gaps-in-education-employment-in-the-philippines/ar-AA1HDRhh
  24. UNESCO. (2018). Measuring gender equality in science and engineering: The SAGA sur-vey of gender equality in science, tech-nology and innovation policies (Working Paper 3). https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/saga-survey-gender-equality-wp3-2018-en.pdf
  25. UNESCO. (2020). STEM education for girls and women: Breaking barriers and exploring gender inequality in Asia. UNESCO Bang-kok. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375106
  26. UNESCO. (2023). STEM education for girls and women: Breaking barriers and exploring gender inequality in Asia. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375106
  27. UNESCO. (2024). New UNESCO report sheds light on gender inequality in STEM educa-tion. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/new-unesco-report-sheds-light-gender-inequality-stem-education
  28. Wang, N., Tan, A.-L., Zhou, X., Liu, K., Zeng, F., & Xiang, J. (2023). Gender differences in high school students’ interest in STEM ca-reers: a multi-group comparison based on structural equation model. Interna-tional Journal of STEM Education, 10(59). https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-023-00443-6
  29. World Bank. (2019). Handbook for gender-inclusive urban planning and design. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelop-ment/publication/handbook-for-gender-inclusive-urban-planning-and-design
  30. Yamio, R. (2023, August 10). Women in STEM: Why so few? FlipScience. https://www.flipscience.ph/features/women-in-stem-why-so-few/
  31. Yu, W., He, J., Luo, J., & Shu, X. (2024). Inter-ventions for gender equality in STEM ed-ucation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Com-puter Assisted Learning, 40(6), 2558–2573. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1448393 

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic