HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 38 no. 2 (2016)

Effect Of Paclobutrazol Treatment On Some Leaf Phsiological And Biochemical Characteristics Of Rejuvenated Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Trees

Arsenio D. Ramos | Antonio L. Acedo Jr.

 

Abstract:

Rejuvenation pruning has been proven effective in bringing back vigor and productivity of old coffee trees. The effectiveness of the present rejuvenation techniques however could be probably enhanced by the application of tree growth regulators with known reinvigorating or tree health enhancing effect such as Paclobutrazol but has not been tried so far. The present study aimed to evaluate some physiological and biochemical responses of the rejuvenated coffee trees to timing and level of PBZ application prior to cutting. Plants applied with PBZ 2 months prior to pruning had higher leaf internal CO concentration compared to those applied 1 month prior to 2 pruning. Net photosynthesis, transpiration rate, PAR/LAI, chlorophyll content, and leaf N, P, K, Ca and Mg contents did not differ with time of PBZ treatment. Application of 0.5-1.0 g a.i. PBZ per meter canopy span significantly increased transpiration rate, internal CO concentration and 2 chlorophyll content but did not affect the rate of photosynthesis, PAR/LAI, leaf N, P, K, Ca and Mg contents.



References:

  1. BACASNO, W. C. 2002. Effects of mulching and fertilizer application on the early growth performance of rejuvenated coffee trees (Coffeaarabica L). Undergraduate BSA Thesis.Leyte State University, Visca, Baybay, Leyte.
  2. BEROVA, M and Z. ZLATEV. 2000. Physiological response and yield of paclobutrazol treated tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill). Plant Growth Regulator 30(2)117-123
  3. CABANGBANG, R. P. 1988. NPK fertilizer requirements of rejuvenated coffee plants. Southern Mindanao Agricultural Research Center Monitor. Kabacan, North Cotabato.
  4. CABANGBANG, R. P. 1990. Coffee rejuvenation in the Philippines. Technol. J. 12(3):1-16.
  5. CANELL, M.G. 1983. Plant Management in Agroforestry: Manipulation of Trees/Population Densities and Mixture of Trees and Herbaceous Crops. Plant Res in Agroforestry.ICRAF.P.O.Box300667 Nairobe, Kenya.pp, 455-487.
  6. CEMARRDEC. 1990. MgaTanong at SagotUkolsaPagpapabatang Kape. University of Southern Mindanao. Kabakan, Cotabato. 12p.
  7. CHANEY, W.R. 2005. Growth retardants: A promising tool for managing urban trees. Purdue University Extension. FNR-252-W.
  8. DALZIEL, J. and D.K. LAWRENCE.1984. Biochemical and biological effects of kaurene oxidase inhibitors such as paclobutrazol. In: Biochemical aspects of synthetic and naturally occurring plant growth regulators. British Plant Growth Regulator Group Monograph.11:43-57.
  9. FLETCHER, R.A. and V. NATH. 1984. Triadirnefon reduces transpiration and increases yield in water stressed plants. Physiol. Plant. 62:422-426.
  10. JATIVA, M.1990. Rehabilitation of coffee trees by stumping in the Amazon Region, Ecuador. Boletin Divulgativo INIAP 1990 No. 207. 9p.
  11. LEAL, F., E.SERGENT, and M. ANEZ. 2000. Effect of some plant growth regulators on leaves content of macronutrient in mango “Haden”. Acta Hort. (509): 631-634.
  12. NETSERE, A., T.SHIMBER,T.KUFA,E.TAYE, and W. GEBRESELASSIE. 2006. Yield response of forest arabica coffee to ridges and rejuvenation methods. Presented in the21st International Conference on Coffee Science, September 11-15, 2006, Montpellier, France. Pp. 1101-1105.
  13. PROIETTI, P., PALLIOTI, P., AMTOGNOZZI, E., FERRANTE, F AND J.D. QUINLAN. 1999. Patterns of anatomy differentiation, growth and physiological activity following paclobutrazol application in chestnut.Acta Hort. 463:177-184
  14. PUGOY, N.P.1991. Initial vegetative regeneration of rejuvenated coffee as influenced by cutting height and NPK fertilizer combination scheme. Undergraduate BSA Thesis. ViSCA, Baybay, Leyte.
  15. PROTACIO, C.M. 2000. A model for potassium nitrate induced flowering in mango. Acta Hort. 509:545-552
  16. QI, Y., HILTON, T.K., W.R. CHANEY, and Y. XIAO. 2006. Paclobutrazol tree growth regulator affects physiology and morphology of sweetgum and cherrybark oak. Presented in 14th Biennial Association of Research Directors’ Symposium, April 1-5, 2006, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  17. RADEMACHER, W. 1991. Biochemical effects of plant growth retardants. In Plant Biochemical Regulators.Edited by H. W. Grossman. Macel Dekker, Inc., New York. pp 169-200.
  18. RAMOS, A.D. AND A.L. ACEDO, JR. 2013. Morphological effects of paclobutrazol on the re-growth of rejuvenated coffee (Coffea arabicaL.) trees. Science and Humanities Journal.10:36-53.
  19. SANKHLA, N., T.D. DAVIS, V.D.JOLLEY,and A. UPADHYAYA. 1986. Effect of paclobutrazol on the development of iron chlorosis in soybeans. J. Plant Nutr. 9:923-934.
  20. SEBASTIAN, B.G., G.ALBERTO, A.C. EMELIO, A.F. JOSE, and A.F. JUAN. 2002. Growth development and color response of potted Dianthus caryophyllus cv. Mandarin to paclobutrazol treatment. Sci. Hort. 1767, 1-7.
  21. SOPHER, C.R., M.KROL, N.P.A. HUNER, A.E. MOORE, and R.S. FLETCHER. 1999. Chloroplastic changes associated with paclobutrazol-induced protection in maize seedlings. Can. J. Bot. 77(2): 279-290.
  22. WANG, S.Y., J.K. BYUN,and G.L. STEFFENS. 1985. Controlling plant growth rate via the gibberellin biosynthesis II: Biochemical and physiological alterations in apple seedlings. Plant Physiol. 82:11-14.
  23. WIELAND, W.F. and R.L.WAMPLE. 1985. Root growth, water relations and mineral uptake of young ‘Delicious’ apple trees treated with soil- and stem-applied paclobutrazol. Sci. Hort.26(2):129-137
  24. YELENOSKY, G., J.C.V. VU,and H.K. WUTCHER. 1995. Influence of paclobutrazol in the soil on growth, nutrient elements in the leaves and flood/freeze tolerance of citrus rootstocks seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 14:129-134
  25. YESHITELA, T.B. 2004. Paclobutrazol suppressed vegetative growth and improved yield as well as fruit quality of ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango (Mangiferaindica L) in Ethiopia. New Zealand Jour. of Crop and Horticultural Sci. 32(3).
  26. ZHOU, W.J. and F. XI. 1993. Effects of mixtatol and paclobutrazol on photosynthesis and yield of rape (Brassica napus). Jour. of Plant Growth Regul. 12:157-161.
  27. http://abstracts.aspb.org/pb2003/public/P72/1437