HomeInternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Researchvol. 6 no. 5 (2025)

Implementation of Open High School Program at Dflomnhs

Catherine C. Balbin | Ederlina M. Sumail

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study assessed the implementation and challenges of the Open High School Program (OHSP) at Doña Francisca Lacsamana de Ortega Memorial National High School (DFLOMNHS), an alternative educational model designed for learners unable to attend traditional classes due to personal, economic, or geographic barriers. Using a mixed-methods descriptive-correlational design, the study surveyed 48 learners and 16 teacher-implementers through validated questionnaires, with reliability coefficients ranging from 0.931 to 0.986. Quantitative data were analyzed using means, t-tests, and Pearson correlations, while qualitative responses were subjected to thematic analysis. Findings revealed that most learners were female (70.83%), aged 16–20, from low-income households (81.25%), and had parents with low educational attainment. While 35.42% of learners performed at an outstanding academic level, 20.84% did not meet expectations. The OHSP was generally well-implemented across four dimensions (M = 3.37 for learners, M = 3.32 for teachers), with no statistically significant difference in perceptions (t = 0.24, p = 0.82). Correlational analysis showed no significant relationships between implementation and learner or teacher profiles, underscoring the program’s equitable reach. However, recurring challenges included limited parental support, inconsistent technology access, and gaps in teacher coordination and instructional delivery. Aligned with global findings on flexible education and student engagement, this study highlights the potential of OHSP to promote educational equity. It recommends enhanced parent training, regular teacher upskilling in digital pedagogy, and stronger community-school collaboration to sustain and improve program outcomes.



References:

  1. Andrada,  L.  M.  (2008). The  Open  High  School Program  (OHSP):  Implementation  Hand-book.  Department  of  Education –Bureau of Secondary Education.
  2. Balsomo, J. R. (2019). Parental  influence on ac-ademic   performance  among  senior  high school    students[Unpublished    thesis]. Ilocos Sur Polytechnic State College.
  3. Bernal, M. A., & Vergara, R. M. (2017). Distance learning  challenges  among  public  school teachers in the Philippines. Journal of Edu-cational  Management  and  Development Studies, 1(2), 45–58.
  4. Bickman,  L.  (1987). The  functions  of  program theory. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Using program theory  in  evaluation(New  Directions  for Program  Evaluation,  No.  33,  pp.  5–18).
  5. Jossey-Bass.DepEd  (2006). Open  High  School  Program  Pri-mer. Department of Education –Bureau of Secondary Education.Balbin& Sumail, 2025 /Implementation of Open High School Program at DflomnhsIJMABER2576Volume 6| Number 5| May| 2025
  6. Graetz, B. (as cited in Balsomo, 2019). Socioec-onomic  status  and  academic  performance. Educational Review, 25(3), 234–245.
  7. Hertz,  M.  F.,  Barrios,  L.  C.,  &  Brener,  N.  D. (2022). Mental health, suicidality, and con-nectedness   among   high   school   students during  the  COVID-19  pandemic.  Morbidity and   Mortality   Weekly   Report,   71(13), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7113e2
  8. Jean Piaget. (1968). The Psychology of the Child. Basic Books.Leganio,  R.  A.  (2017). Parental  educational  at-tainment and students’ academic perfor-mance.  Philippine  Journal  of  Educational Measurement, 4(1), 1–10.
  9. Lessard, L.  M., & Puhl, R. M. (2022). Adolescent academic  experiences  and  mental  health during  COVID-19:  The  role  of  peer  and teacher   support.   Journal   of   Youth   and Adolescence, 51(5), 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01513-3
  10. Mirasol, M., Santiago, J., & Roque, L. (2023). Per-ceived  flexibility  and  effectiveness  of  Open High  School  Programs  in  the  Philippines. International Journal of Flexible Learning, 11(1), 22–35.
  11. Scriven,  M.  (2004). Key  evaluation  checklist. Western  Michigan  University  Evaluation Center.
  12. Taguba, J. F. (2023). Barriers in the implementa-tion of the Open High School Program. Phil-ippine Education Review, 18(2), 67–75.Thompson, C., Goe, L., & Paek, P. L. (2018). Eq-uity and deeper learning: Outcomes and op-portunities. Educational Policy Institute.
  13. UNESCO.  (2015). Education  for  All  2000–2015: Achievements  and  Challenges.  United  Na-tions  Educational,  Scientific  and  Cultural Organization