Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 42 no. 10 (2025)

Utilizing English Language Practice and Learners’ Proficiency Level in Sentence Construction

Merve Glenn Canonigo | Lutchie Ducot

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigates the impact of utilizing English in the classroom to improve sentence formation proficiency among learners in the Don Carlos I District, Division of Bukidnon, during the 2024-2025 school year. With the aim of enhancing sentence construction skills, the research focuses on the extent to which English language practices are incorporated into the classroom through various activities such as writing prompts, group discussions, teacher support, and peer interactions. A descriptive-correlational research design was used to gather data from 150 respondents using a researcher-made survey questionnaire. The study assesses learners' proficiency level in sentence construction based on their academic performance in English. The findings revealed that English language practice, integrated into lesson plans, greatly contributes to learners’ proficiency in sentence construction. Activities such as grammar exercises, group discussions, and peer interactions positively impacted the learners' ability to form sentences. The study further shows a strong, significant correlation between frequent English utilization and higher sentence construction proficiency. Specifically, peer interaction, engagement with English materials, and teacher guidance played pivotal roles in reinforcing learners’ sentence-building abilities. The learners’ overall proficiency was rated as “Very Satisfactory,” confirming the effectiveness of these strategies. In conclusion, this research highlights the importance of consistent and varied English language practices in the classroom for improving sentence construction proficiency. Teachers are encouraged to continue integrating diverse language activities and provide ongoing support to foster learners’ sentence formation skills. The study recommends further research to explore the effectiveness of specific language activities on sentence construction across different educational settings.



References:

  1. Action, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge.
  2. Almarza, G. (2019). Explicit instruction in sentence structure. English Teaching & Learning, 43(1), 1-20.
  3. Almarza, G. (2019). The Role of Explicit Instruction in Developing Sentence Construction Skills: A Study of EFL Learners. Language Learning Journal, 47(3), 343-359.
  4. Al-Mekhla i, A., & Nagaratnam, R. P. (2017). Language Activities to Improve Sentence Formation in EFL Learners. International Journal of English Language Teaching, (1), 34-45.
  5. Alnassri, A., Alnassri, A., & Alnassri, A. (2022). Multimedia tools on learners’ performance in Filipino. PhilArchive. https://philarchive.org/rec/ALMMTO
  6. Alnassri, M., et al. (2022). The Impact of Multimedia Resources on English Language Learning: Engaging Students for Improved Sentence Formation Skills. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-18.
  7. Bada, S. (2015). Flipped instruction: Upscaling learners’ sentence structures in writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3), 567–574. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0603.10
  8. Bygate, M. (2015). Speaking. Oxford University Press.
  9. Cagatan, A. N., & Quirap, E. A. (2024). Collaborative learning and learners’ academic performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(3), 1326-1335. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i03-57
  10. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2016). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining” gamification”. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2425-2434).
  11. Deterding, S., et al. (2016). From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: defining” gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15).
  12. Dimayuga, F., & Quisido, P. Q. (2019). Using sentence combining strategy and writing performance in English of Grade 9 students. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5171733
  13. Ellis, N. C., et al. (2016). The Importance of Frequency in Language Learning: Effects of Practice and Repetition on Sentence Formation. Language Learning Journal, 45(4), 323-345.
  14. Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  15. Ellis, R. (2016). Grammar Teaching and Sentence Formation: Research-Ba ed Principles and Practices. Language Teaching, 49(2), 234-246.
  16. Ellis, R. (2017). The Interaction Hypothesis and its Implications for Language Pedagogy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 677-7 0.
  17. Garton, S., & Copland, F. (2018). Classroom Talk and the Frequency of English Language Use: Impacts on Sentence Formation Skills. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 524-548.
  18. Gilli s, R. M. (2016). Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39-5.
  19. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
  20. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Peer interaction and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 1-11.
  21. Gillies, R. M. (2021). Collaborative Learning: Improving Students’ Sentence Formation Skills Through Group Work. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 569-587.
  22. Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Emerging technologies: Augmented reality and language learning: From conception to application. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 9-24.
  23. Goh, C. C., & Burns, A. (2017). Teaching Speaking: A Holistic Approach to Improving Sentence Formation and Communication. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Harris, M. (2018). Assessment for Learning: Evaluating Sentence Format in Proficiency in EFL Contexts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 32, 26-35.
  25. Harris, M. (2018). Performance-based assessment in the English learning process. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 1-15.
  26.  Hyland, K. (2019). Peer Feedback in Writing: How Frequency of Interaction Improves Sentence Formation. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 220-241.
  27. Hyland, M., & Hyland, F. (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and is uses. Cambridge University Press.
  28. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperative learning: Putting cooperative learning into Practice. Interdependence and Positive Goal Structures: Theory and Research on Cooperation and Competition, 123-152.
  29. Kim, H. (2018). Authentic materials in language learning. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 345-360.
  30. Kim, H. (2018). The Role of Authentic Materials in Enhancing Student Engagement in English Language Learning. TESOL Journal, 9(3), 545-563.
  31. Lee, I. (2021). The Roe of Writing Practice in Sentence Formation P proficiency: How Frequency Matters. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 101-112.
  32. Lon, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Lumabi, B. M., & Tabajen, R. C. (2021). College students’ experience in online asynchronous peer feedback in writing. TESOL and Technology Studies, 2(2), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.48185/tts.v2i2.250
  34. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2018). Corrective Feedback and Its Role in Sentence Formation Proficiency: A Meta-Analysis of Research in Second Language Classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 1-35.
  35. Magbanua, J. J. (2024). Enhancing English grammar skills of Grade 9 students through the use of an English grammar application. English Language Teaching World, 11(2), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v11i2.66180
  36. Malinda, M. V., Utama, E. G., & Mulyani, S. (2024). The effect of role-playing learning model on the speaking skills of grade V elementary school students. International Journal of Research in Education, 4(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v4i1.15443
  37.  McDonough, K., & Crawford, W. J. (2018). Peer Interaction and Grammar Development in the ESL Classroom. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 329-346.
  38. Mercer, (2019). Classroom Talk and the Development of Sentence Formation Skills in English: Evidence from Interaction-Based Studies. Language and Education, 33(3), 246-263.
  39. Munap, M. S. (2025). The use of formative assessment in enhancing student learning experiences: The case of Maimbung District, Division of Sulu. Journal of Education and Academic Settings, 2(1), 1-15.
  40. Nabiryo, N. R., & Sekiziyivu, S. (2020). The influence of peer interaction on students’ mastery of writing. Education Quarterly Reviews, 3(1), 91-104.
  41. Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2016). Current Developments in the Teaching of Grammar: An Overview. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 297-309.
  42. Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge.
  43. Nugroho, S. A. (2021). Improving the writing skill of the students using peer-editing. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 6(2), 234–236. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.62.34
  44. Nunan, D. (2019). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  45. Rakes, G. C (2021). The Impact of Technology on Writing Proficiency: A Study of EFL Learners. Computers & Education, 164, 104129.
  46. Rakes, G. C. (2021). The impact of technology-enhanced instruction on writing proficiency. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 456-472.
  47. Richards, J. C.  2017). Developing Classroom Speaking Activities: From Theor to Practice. Cambridge University Press.
  48. Richards, J. C. (2017). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  49. Saddler, B., & Asaro-Saddler, K. (2018). Writing Interventions for Sentence Combining and Proficiency in Sentence Structure. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(2), 101-121.
  50. Saddler, B., & Asaro-Saddler, K. (2018). Writing to learn: Sentence combining and writing instruction. Routledge.
  51. Santos, M. (2021). The linguistic effects of peer editing as a technique in improving collegiate compositions. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 5(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v5i1.11960
  52. Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2020). Peer correction and sentence construction. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 56-70.
  53. Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2020). Peer Interaction and Focus on Form: Enhancing Grammatical Development in L2 Classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 95-12.
  54. Stockwell, G. (2016). Technology and culture in second language learning and teaching. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of language learning and Technology (pp. 165-177). Routledge.
  55. Storch, N. & Aldosari, A. (2018). Pair Collaboration and Feedback in ESL Writing: A Focus on Grammar and Sentence Structure. Language Teaching Research, 22(4), 494-512.
  56. Storch, N. (2017). Collaborative Writing n L2 Contexts: Insights from Research and Practice. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 583-601.
  57. Storch, N., & Aldosari, H. (2018). Peer interaction in the classroom. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 234-248.
  58. Swain, M, & Lapkin, S. (2015). Interaction and Negotiation in Language Learning: A focus on Meaning and Sentence Construction. Language Learning, 65(2), 259-279.
  59. Thongtum, T., & Intasena, A. (2023). Enhancing learning achievement in sentence structure among grade 8 students using the GPAS 5 STEP learning management model. Higher Education Studies, 13(4), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v13n4p59
  60. Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
  61. Topping, K. J. (2020). Formative assessment and feedback for learning. Educational Psychology, 40(2), 123-135.
  62. Topping, K. J. (2020). Peer Assessment: A Meta-Analysis of Impact on Student Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 435-455.
  63.  Unit, D. (2019). Task-Based Language Teaching: A Comprehensive Overview. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 1-20.
  64. Van d Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2018). Scaffolding and Learning to Form Sentences in English Classrooms: A Review of Empirical Evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 645-671.
  65. Viado, A. L., & Espiritu, J. A. (2023). The collaborative-individual learning in improving the critical thinking skills of secondary students in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(7), 2592-2600. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.07.35
  66. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  67. Warsc auer, M., & Grimes, D. (2020). Technology and Language Learning: The Role of Gamified Platforms in Enhancing Sentence Formation Skills. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 1-15.
  68. Winarto, A. E. (2018). Peer and self-editing strategies to improve students’ writing skill. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 5(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v6i1.3573
  69. Xu, X., Zhang, Y., & Li, Z. (2021). Technology-enhanced learning environments and sentence formation proficiency. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 789-803.
  70. Xu, Y. et al. (2021). Technology-Enhanced Learning and Engagement in English Language Classrooms: The Role of Digital Tools in Sentence Formation Skills. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(3), 32 -340.
  71. Yang, X., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2020). Peer collaboration and its impact on sentence construction. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 123-135.
  72. Yang, Y., et al. (2020). Collaborative Learning in English Language Classrooms: The Impact on Student Engagement and Sentence Formation Proficiency. Educational Studies, 46(4), 456-472.
  73. Zhang, Y. et al. (2020). Technology-Enhanced English Language Learning: Increasing Practice Frequency for Sentence Formation Proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 567-588.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic