Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 37 no. 8 (2025)

Challenges Encountered in Distance Learning Among Grade 11 Learners of Iligan Computer Institute S. Y. 2020-2021

Diamon Diso

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine the challenges encountered in distance learning among Grade 11 learners of Iligan Computer institute S.Y. 2020-2021 in this time of the pandemic. The study answered the questions on the profile of respondents in terms of age, sex, and family monthly income as well as the challenges encountered in digital learning in securing the digital modules, learning space at home, and learning facilitator at home. This study also investigated the significant relationship between demographic profiles of the respondents and the challenges encountered in their digital learning and their academic performance. The descriptive correlational method of research was used in this study. Results revealed that most of the respondents were in the age bracket 17-18 years old and there was no problem in module distribution, information dissemination, availability of learning materials, and learning facilitator except in the provision of learning space at home. The result also revealed that learners were performing well academically and a significant relationship was established between the challenges encountered in terms of securing the module learning materials.



References:

  1. Adams, C. (2017). The Implementation of Modular Distance Learning in the Philippine Secondary Public Schools
  2. Akpabio, I. U. (2018). Managing school facilities for quality education in Nigeria: 
  3. Challenges and prospects. Journal of Qualitative Education.https://www.globalacademicgroup.com/journals/.
  4. Alebaikan, R., & Troudi, S. (2019) Blended learning in Saudi universities: challenges and perspectives. Research in Learning Technology, Volume 18,2019series1, page 45-59, https://doi.org/10.1080/0968776100365761
  5. Amadora, M. (2020). Online Distance Learning: Thematic Study on the Challenges Faced.
  6. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Perspectives Vol. 8, No. 1, May 2021. Azevedo, R. Terete, M. & Degua, Y. (2015). Measuring Self-Regulation in Self-Paced Open and Distance Learning Environments.
  7. Azevedo et al. (2015). Simulating the Potential Impacts of COVID-19 School Closures on Schooling and Learning Outcomes : A Set of Global Estimates.
  8. Bandura, S. (2018, February 5). Social learning theory. Simplypsychology.org website: https://www. Simplypsychology.org/bandura.html 2.
  9. Barshay, R. (2018). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1),16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338.
  10. Barnard, L., Paton, T., Lehmann, S. Hähnlein, V. & Ifenthaler, R. (2014). Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments.
  11. Barnard, L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments.
  12. Bhat et al. (2016). Exploring Asynchronous and Synchronous Tool Use in Online Courses.
  13. Bednar et al., 1992. Constructivism and Instructional Design.
  14. Bigelow, S. (2009). Comparing student performance in an online versus a face to face introductory turfgrass science course - a case study.
  15. Blackmore, L. (1996). Social interaction learning styles in on and off-campus environments.
  16. Brown, H.  (2016). Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments.
  17. Dabbagh, Y. Kitsantas, D. & Wilson, K. (1997). Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR) – Peer Reviewed Journal Vol. 7, No. 7, July 2021.
  18. Dangle, Y. & Sumaoang, J. (2020). The Implementation of Modular Distance Learning in the Philippine Secondary Public Schools
  19. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning Theory.
  20. Felter, C. & Maizland, L. (2020). The new normal in education: A challenge to the private basic education institution in the Philippines.
  21. Garrison, L. (2000). Transactional distance theory by Moore transactional distance theory.
  22. Giossos, S., Koutsouba, F. & Lionarakis, K. (2009). Transactional distance theory by Moore transactional distance theory.
  23. Geneva, D. (2020). World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation Report 100.
  24. Hole, G. (1981). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research.
  25. Jaques and Salmon (2007). Learning in Groups: A Handbook for Face-to-Face and Online Environments.
  26. Jung, A. (2001). Transactional distance theory by Moore Transactional Distance Theory.
  27. Kaplan, Frias, &  McFall-Johnsen, (2020). Distance Learning in the Philippines in the Light of COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Future Directions.
  28. Katz R, Wentworth M, Quick J, Arabasadi A, Harris E, & Geddes K. (2018). Enhancing public–private cooperation in epidemic preparedness and response. World Med Health Policy. (2018) 10:420–5. 10.1002/wmh3.281.
  29. Kuo, R., Walker, H., & Schroder, D. (2014). Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments.
  30. Kuo, L., Yukselturk, L., & Bulut, J. (2007). Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments.
  31. Llego, M. ( 2020). The Implementation of Modular Distance Learning in the Philippine Secondary Public Schools
  32. Loken, K.  (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample.
  33. Moore, L. (2012). Transactional distance theory by Moore Transactional Distance Theory.
  34. Milligan, F. (2016). Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments.
  35. Moore, F. & Kearsley, T. (2012). Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments.
  36. Mclsaac, J. & Gunawardena, F.  (1996). Transactional distance theory by Moore Transactional Distance Theory.
  37. Moore, D. & Kearsley, H. (1996). Transactional distance theory by Moore Transactional Distance Theory.
  38. Oztok et al., (2013). Exploring Asynchronous and Synchronous Tool Use in Online Courses.
  39. Panadero, G. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: six models and four directions for research.
  40. (Pereja, B. (2016). Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations.
  41. Piaget, J. (1980). Constructivist Theory.
  42. Steinmayr, R. (2019). The importance of students’ motivation for their academic achievement replicating and extending previous findings. Frontiers in Psychology,10(1730). https:/doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01730.
  43. Sun, J.C and Rueda, R. (2012). Immersive Learning Design (ILD): A New Model to Assure the Quality of Learning through Flipped Classrooms
  44. Thorndike, E. (2017). Contribution to the field of psychology. Verywell mind website: http://www.veryeellmind.com/edward-thorndike-biology.
  45. Tria, J. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Education in the Philippines: The New Normal Website: https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8311
  46. UNESCO, (2020). UNESCO and DepEd launch the 2020 Global Education Monitoring Report in the Philippines
  47. Vygotsky, L. (2005). The theory zone of proximal development and forbidden color game.
  48. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Zone of Proximal Development and Scaffolding.
  49. Yamey G, Schäferhoff  M, Aars OK, Bloom B, Carroll D, Chawla M. (2017). Financing of international collective action for epidemic and pandemic preparedness. Lancet Global Health. (2017) 5:e742–4. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X (17)30203-6.
  50. Zhang, J. (2007). Transactional distance theory by Moore Transactional Distance Theory.
  51. Zimmerman, G. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: These are the key subprocesses.
  52. Zimmerman, G. (2001). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research.
  53. Zimmerman, A. (2019). Do students grit predict their school achievement above and beyond their personality, motivation, and engagement? Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 53 106-122. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.02.004.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic