Effectiveness of PICRAT and POWER Writing Models in Enhancing the Writing Skills of Students
Anjenet Labor
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
Writing proficiency is a fundamental skill necessary for academic success, yet many Junior High School students struggle with key writing components. This quasi-experimental study assessed the effectiveness of the PICRAT and POWER writing models on the writing skills of 76 Grade 9 students. PICRAT was administered to 38 students and POWER to another 38, using pre- and post-tests evaluated through a standardized rubric. Results showed significant improvements in all writing dimensions for both groups. PICRAT demonstrated greater effectiveness with post-test mean scores (Content = 4.55, SD = 0.30; Grammar = 4.54, SD = 0.33; Organization = 4.49, SD = 0.30; Vocabulary = 4.52, SD = 0.26; Mechanics = 4.50, SD = 0.31) compared to POWER (Content = 3.11, SD = 0.65; Grammar = 2.87, SD = 0.74; Organization = 2.98, SD = 0.59; Vocabulary = 3.13, SD = 0.74; Mechanics = 2.86, SD = 0.58). ANCOVA confirmed statistical significance (F = 27.165, p < .001), with a partial eta squared of .271. Findings support integrating structured, tech-enhanced writing interventions like PICRAT in curricula.
References:
- Brown, T. (2019). Writing mechanics: Forgotten fundamentals in secondary education. The English Teacher, 48(3), 210–229.
- Chen, L. (2016). The impact of grammar instruction on second language writing skills. TESOL Journal, 7(4), 550–566.
- Garcia, L. (2020). The impact of vocabulary instruction on writing skills: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 113(2), 123–135.
- Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2014). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education.
- Handley, M. A., Lyles, C. R., McCulloch, C., & Cattamanchi, A. (2018). Selecting and improving quasi-experimental designs in effectiveness and implementation research. Annual Review of Public Health, 39(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014128
- Johnson, R. (2022). Student engagement and academic performance: The role of active learning strategies. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 345–367.
- Lee, T., & Thompson, S. (2022). Vocabulary development and writing proficiency: An exploration of middle school students. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 38(4), 345–360.
- Martinez, C., & Perez, F. (2017). Organizational skills in ESL learners: A structural approach. Language Education Quarterly, 28(1), 78–93.
- Moses, R. N., & Mohamad, M. (2019). Challenges faced by students and teachers on writing skills in ESL contexts: A literature review. Creative Education, 10(13), 3385–3391. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1013260
- Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2015). Reading habits and writing proficiency among adolescents. Journal of Literacy Education, 32(2), 101–118.
- Smith, J., Johnson, R., & Lee, T. (2021). The effectiveness of targeted writing interventions in high school students. Educational Psychology International, 29(1), 45–67.
- Smith, L., & Johnson, R. (2021). Structured interventions for secondary writing success. Journal of Educational Strategies, 27(2), 120–135.
- Thompson, S. (2023). Collaborative learning and its impact on writing performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 18(1), 101–115.
- Thompson, S., & Garcia, R. (2018). Vocabulary diversity and writing engagement in middle school learners. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 34(2), 141–160.
Philippine E-Journals
