Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 43 no. 9 (2025)

AI-Assisted Language Assessment: Basis for Senior High School Language Arts Instruction Assessment

Gladys Campos-Marces

Discipline: Artificial Intelligence

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the role of AI-assisted language assessment in evaluating students' English-speaking proficiency, focusing on grammar, fluency, pronunciation, and vocabulary. It aimed to determine how AI-generated feedback can serve as a basis for enhancing language arts instruction assessment. The study involved seventy (70) Grade 11 HUMSS students from ACLC College of Ormoc City, Inc. A descriptive research design was employed, and students’ speaking performances were assessed using an AI tool. Scores were analyzed based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), identifying the dominant proficiency levels for each linguistic component. Results revealed that the majority of students achieved high proficiency levels in grammar and vocabulary, predominantly reaching C1 and C2 classifications. However, greater variability was observed in fluency and pronunciation, where some students exhibited occasional hesitations and minor inconsistencies. Despite providing structured and standardized evaluations, the AI tool demonstrated limitations, such as generating vague, repetitive feedback and displaying difficulty in adapting to varied discussion themes. Issues in the clarity and accuracy of the quantitative scores were also noted. Moreover, the AI tool was observed to consistently assign overly high scores across linguistic competencies, raising concerns about its reliability as an assessment measure. As a result, the study does not recommend the use of AI as a sole assessment method for speaking proficiency at the Senior High School level, emphasizing the continued need for human evaluation to ensure more accurate, fair, and meaningful feedback.



References:

  1. “2020 English Proficiency Index: Philippines out of World’s Top 20 but Is No.2 in Asia.” Philstar.Com, https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2020/11/19/2058021/2020-english-proficiency-index-philippines-out-worlds-top-20-no2-asia. Accessed 28 Dec. 2024.
  2. “Council of Europe Language Policy Portal - Language Policy - Www.Coe.Int.” Language Policy, https://www.coe.int/en/web/language-policy. Accessed 5 Jan. 2025.
  3. “Why Is It Important to Read to Your Child?” Child Mind Institute, https://childmind.org/article/why-is-it-important-to-read-to-your-child/. Accessed 2 Jan. 2025.
  4. “Why Is Vocabulary Important in Language Learning?” Text Inspector, 24 June 2022, https://textinspector.com/vocabulary-in-language-learning/.
  5. Abbasi, Irum. “The Influence of Technology on English Language and Literature.” English Language Teaching, vol. 13, no. 7, June 2020, p. 1. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p1.
  6. Addaeroby, Muhammad Fahdin, and Erma Febriani. “Application Of Skinner’s Behaviorist Learning Theory In Learning Arabic Speaking Proficiency/ Penerapan Teori Belajar Behavioristik Skinner Dalam Pembelajaran Maharah Kalam.” Jurnal Bahasa Arab, vol. 1, no. 1, June 2024, pp. 33–42. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.69988/mx5kzs45.
  7. Agustina, Lia, and R. Setiawan. “Fostering a natural atmosphere; improving students’ communication skill in a business meeting.” Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, vol. 8, no. 3, July 2020, p. 307. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v8i3.2746.
  8. Ahmadi, Reza Mohammad. “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Research in English Education, vol. 3, no. 2, 2018, pp. 115–125.
  9. AI’s Impact on Language Learning. 15 Dec. 2023, https://www.pearson.com/languages/community/blogs/2023/12/ai-and-language-learning.html.
  10. Aizawa, Ikuya, and Heath Rose. “An Analysis of Japan’s English as Medium of Instruction Initiatives within Higher Education: The Gap between Meso- Level Policy and Micro-Level Practice.” Higher Education, vol. 77, no. 6, June 2019, pp. 1125–42. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0323-5.
  11. Akbar, Muhammad Sajjad. Beyond Detection: Designing AI-Resilient Assessments with Automated Feedback Tool to Foster Critical Thinking. arXiv, 2025. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2503.23622.
  12. Akshay Akash’s Stimuler: Transforming Language Learning with AI. 3 June 2024, https://founderhub.in/stimuler-language-learning-journey/.
  13. Al-Dawoody Abdulaal, Mohammad Awad. “Krashen’s Monitor Model Revisited with Some Linguistic Evidence for the Homogeneity Hypothesis.” 2021.
  14. Aldoori, Reem. “The Impact of Native Language on Teaching EFL: Case of University College Students.” European Scholar Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, 2023, pp. 89–103.
  15. Algaraady, Jeehaan, and Mohammad Mahyoob. “ChatGPT’s Capabilities in Spotting and Analyzing Writing Errors Experienced by EFL Learners.” Arab World English Journal, no. 9, July 2023, pp. 3–17. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.1.
  16. Ali, Derakhshan and Ali, Malmir. The Role of Language Aptitude in the Development of L2 Pragmatic Competence. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 2021, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1302426.pdf.
  17. Alisoy, Hasan. “The Role of Using Authentic Videos on Learners’ Pronunciation.” Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, vol. 2, no. 2, Mar. 2025, pp. 49–57. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.025002088.
  18. Almassaad, Ahmad, et al. “Student Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Investigating Utilization, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education.”  Systems, vol. 12, no. 10, Sept. 2024, p. 385. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385.
  19. Alova, C. A., and I. M. Calanza-Alova. “Grammatical and Academic Writing Competence of Special Science Class Students.” Puissant, vol. 4, 1 Jan. 2023, pp. 747–763. Accessed       at //puissant.stepacademic.net/puissant/article/view/132.
  20. Al-Rickaby, Amjed. “The Survival of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis: A Look Under the Hood.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 13, no. 1, Dec.   2022, pp. 17. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1301.01.
  21. Andilab, Desiree, and Evely Amante. Grammatical Competence and Grammatical Knowledge of Senior Secondary Students in the New Normal: Learning Interventions. May            2024. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11215377.
  22. Arturo G. Palaming. “Students’ Competence in Composition Writing: Basis for a Proposed Intervention Strategy Plan.” EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD), June 2023, pp. 21–26. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.36713/epra13504.
  23. Asratie, Mekuriaw Genanew, et al. “Effects of Using Educational Technology Tools to Enhance EFL Students’ Speaking Performance.” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 8, Aug. 2023, pp. 10031–51. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11562-y.
  24. Ati, Asih, and Aseptiana Parmawati. “The Use of Oral Presentation in Teaching English to Improve Students Speaking Skill.” Project (Professional Journal of English Education), vol. 5, no. 2, Mar. 2022, p. 300. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v5i2.p300-305.
  25. Aylet, Y. T., Asratie, M. G., and Wale, B. D. “Effects of Using Educational Technology Tools to Enhance EFL Students’ Speaking Performance.” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 1, 2023, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11562-y.
  26. Bearman, Margaret. Re-Imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. Springer International Publishing AG, 2020.
  27. Blog, Sanako. “What’s More Important in Language Teaching: Accuracy or Fluency?” Sanako, 22 July 2021, https://sanako.com/accuracy-or-fluency.
  28. Brown, Roger. “Development of the First Language in the Human Species.” American Psychologist, vol. 28, no. 2, Feb. 1973, pp. 97–106. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034209.
  29. Çakmak, Ceren Taşatan, and Ali Merç. “Turkish EFL Learners’ Lexical Competence and Performance.” Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 2, Mar. 2021, pp.   946–64. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.904092.
  30. CEDTyClea. “Filipinos’ Declining English Proficiency Alarms Foreign Business Groups.” BusinessWorld   Online, 16 Oct. 2023, https://www.bworldonline.com/top-stories/2023/10/17/551860/filipinos-declining-english-proficiency-alarms-foreignbusiness groups/.
  31. Cerovac, Milorad, and Therese Keane. “Early Insights into Piaget’s Cognitive Development Model through the Lens of the Technologies Curriculum.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 35, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 61–81. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798- 024-09906-5.
  32. Chai, Fangyuan, et al. “Grading by AI Makes Me Feel Fairer? How Different Evaluators Affect College Students’ Perception of Fairness.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15,   Feb. 2024, p. 1221177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1221177.
  33. Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk, and Wenjie Hu. “Students’ Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, July 2023, p. 43. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8.
  34. Chand, Gambhir Bahadur. “Challenges Faced by Bachelor Level Students While Speaking English.” IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), vol. 6, no. 1, Nov. 2021, p. 45. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v6i1.853.
  35. Chuang, Hsueh‐Hua, et al. “Which Students Benefit Most from a Flipped Classroom Approach to Language Learning?” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, no. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 56–68. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12530.
  36. Corujo, Jennifer. 6 Levels of English Language Proficiency for ELL Students. https://www.hmhco.com/blog/levels-of-english-language-proficiency-for-ell- students. Accessed 28 Dec. 2024.
  37. Dajuela, Stephanie A., et al. “Attitudes, Motivations and Academic Performance in English among the Junior High School Students in Sulangon National High School.” International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, Feb. 2024. ijels.com, https://ijels.com/detail/attitudes-motivations- and-academic-performance-in-english among-the-junior-high-school- students-in-sulangon-national-high-school/.
  38. Dalan, John Den            Saul. Exploring-the-Promise-A-Comprehensive-Review-of-Artificial-Intelligence-Integration-in-Language-Education-in-the-Philippine- Context. 2024. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27224.51201.
  39. Davis-Kean, Pamela E. “The Influence of Parent Education and Family Income on Child Achievement: The Indirect Role of Parental Expectations and the Home Environment.” Journal of Family Psychology, vol. 19, no. 2, 2005, pp. 294–304. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.294.
  40. De Castro, Divina M., and Genevieve Marie T. Bactasa. Linguistic Competence of Senior High School Students in Ormoc City. Aug. 2023. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8325526.ss
  41. Deala, Arlene. “Integration of Reading Assessment: A Strategy to Improve Reading Skills of Students.” Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, vol. 8, no. 1, 2024, pp.70–79.
  42. Dr. Muhammad Idris, et al. “Relationship between Parents’ Education and Their Children’s Academic Achievement: Parent’s Education and Their Children Academic Achievement.” Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, Dec. 2020, pp. 82–92. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.46662/jass- vol7-iss2-2020(82-92).
  43. Dulay, Heidi C., and Marina K. Burt. “Natural Sequences in Child Second Language Acquisition1.” Language Learning, vol. 24, no. 1, Jan. 1974, pp. 37–53. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 1770.1974.tb00234.x.
  44. Eslit, Edgar Rendon, and Analiza Valderama. “English Language Proficiency Skills Among High School Students: Basis for an Intervention Program.” English Learning Innovation, vol. 4, no. 1, Feb. 2023, pp. 46–57. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v4i1.24759.
  45. Feng, Lei, et al. “Determinants of Students’ Academic Success in English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) Classes: A Systematic Review.” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 10, Oct. 2023, p. e20421. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20421.
  46. Fengyu, Zai. “The Impact of Vocabulary Learning Methods on Students’ Vocabulary Application Skills.” English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, Oct. 2023, p. p206. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.22158/eltls.v5n4p206.
  47. Four Models of Parent Involvement. https://extension.umn.edu/parent-school-partnerships/four-models-parent-involvement. Accessed 2 Jan. 2025.
  48. Garner, Joanna K., and Avi Kaplan. “A Complex Dynamic Systems Perspective on Teacher Learning and Identity Formation: An Instrumental Case.” Teachers and Teaching, vol. 25, no. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 7–33. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1533811.
  49. Gawate, S. (2019). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based Instructional Programs in Teaching Learning of English Language. https://doi.org/10.33329/ijelr.64.69
  50. Ghafar, Zanyar Nathir, et al. “The Role of Artificial Intelligence Technology on English Language Learning: A Literature Review.” Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, 2023. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v3i2.87.
  51. Global Scientific Journal - GSJ Publication - Home. http://www.globalscientificjournal.com/. Accessed 2 Mar. 2025.
  52. González-Calatayud, Víctor, et al. “Artificial Intelligence for Student Assessment: A Systematic Review.” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 12, June 2021, p. 5467. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125467.
  53. Guidelines on the Use of AI in Teaching and Learning. UP Open University, 2023, https://www.upou.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Guidelines-on-Use-of-AI-in-Teaching-and-Learning.pdf.
  54. Gutiérrez-Porlán, Isabel, et al. “Digital Technologies for the Assessment of Oral English Skills.” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 22, Nov. 2022, p. 11635. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211635.
  55. Han, Jian. “On Approaches to English Grammar Teaching and Its Current Situation.” OALib, vol. 10, no. 12, 2023, pp. 1–12. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111059.
  56. Hishan, Sanil. “Enhancing Speaking Fluency and Accuracy in a Task-Based Language Teaching Approach with Corrective Feedback.” International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, vol. 29, 2020, pp. 658–669.
  57. Hossain, Kazi Imran, et al. “A Comprehensive Review on the Impact of Teacher Feedback in Language Development for ESL/EFL Learners.” IUBAT Review, vol. 7, no. 1, June 2024, pp. 218–29. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3329/iubatr.v7i1.74421.
  58. Houwer, Jan De, et al. “Associative Learning of Likes and Dislikes: Some Current Controversies and Possible Ways Forward.” Cognition and Emotion, vol. 19, no. 2, Jan. 2005, pp. 161–74. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000265.
  59. Ika Afiyanti, Nur Rahma, et al. “Students Perceptions of the Use of English as Medium of Instruction.” TRANS-KATA: Journal of Language, Literature, Culture and Education, vol. 1, no. 2, May 2021, pp. 115–23. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.54923/transkata.v1i2.57.
  60. Jacobsen, Lucas, Jonathan Rohlmann, and Kira Weber. “AI Feedback in Education: The Impact of Prompt Design and Human Expertise on LLM Performance.” OSF Preprints, 2025, doi:10.31219/osf.io/fx5qz.
  61. Jhangiani, Dr Rajiv, and Dr Hammond Tarry. Principles of Social Psychology - 1st International H5P Edition. BCcampus, 2022. opentextbc.ca, https://opentextbc.ca/socialpsychology/.
  62. Karademir, Tugra, and Ayfer Alper. “Evaluating the Evaluators: A Comparative Study of AI and Teacher Assessments in Higher Education.” Digital Education Review, 2024, pp. 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2024.45.124-140.
  63. Kekana, Tebogo Johannes, and Malesela Edward Montle. “The Use of the Official Indigenous Languages in the South African Judcial System Reimagined, Poignant and Tacit Issues Explored.” ScienceRise, no. 3, June 2022, pp. 73–82. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.21303/2313-8416.2022.002556.
  64. Khalid, Rabia, et al. “Impact of Poverty on Secondary School Academic Achievement among Girls in District Faisalabad, Pakistan; A Cross Sectional Study: Impact of Poverty on Secondary School Students.” Pakistan BioMedical Journal, Feb. 2023, pp. 12–16. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v6i02.846.
  65. Krashen, S. 1983. Newmark’s “Ignorance Hypothesis” and current second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass and L. Selinker (Eds.) Language Transfer in Language Learning. New York: Newbury House. pp. 135-153.
  66. Krashen, Stephen D. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. 1st ed., Pergamon, 1982.
  67. Krüger, Maleika. “Theory of Second Language Acquisition.” Media-Related Out-of- School Contact with English in Germany and Switzerland, by Maleika Krüger, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2023, pp. 51–93. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42408-4_4.
  68. Kumar, Om. “Investigating the Impact of Artificial Intelligence AI and Technology in English Language Learning.” Advances in Social Behavior Research, vol. 3, no. 1, Nov. 2023, pp. 27–36. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7102/3/2023026.
  69. Lao, Tiffany Laiyin. “The Relationship between ESL Learners’ Motivation, Willingness to Communicate, Perceived Competence, and Frequency of L2 Use.” Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, vol. 20, no. 2, 2020, pp. 36–56. ERIC, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1288718.
  70. Lavadia, Michael. “Grammatical, Discourse Competence and Productive Skills Among First Year ESL Learners.” Issues in Language Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, June 2023, pp. 16–38. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5386.2023.
  71. Lillis, Theresa. “Communicative Competence.” Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Jan. 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01275-X.
  72. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., and Forcier, L. B. Intelligence Unbound: The Interplay of Human and Artificial Intelligence. Routledge, 2016.
  73. Manggiasih, Laras Ayuningtyas, et al. “Strengths and Limitations of SmallTalk2Me App in English Language Proficiency Evaluation.” Tell: Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, Nov. 2023. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.30651/tell.v11i2.19560.
  74. Manuel, Jomel Balinuyus. “English Language Proficiency of Senior High School Students.” Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, Apr. 2022, pp. 71–86. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2022.16638.
  75. Marcelo, Elizabeth. “Philippines             Improves         in         English            Proficiency Index.” Philstar.Com, https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/02/2315811/philippines-improves-english-proficiency-index. Accessed 2 Jan. 2025.
  76. Mark Lester B. Liquigan, et al. “Effects of Home Environment to The Academic Performance Of The Grade 10 Students At Sto. Nino National High School, Cagayan, Philippines”. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, Nov. 2023, pp. 31-44, https://ijciss.org/index.php/ijciss/article/view/19.
  77. Mayer, Susan E., and New Zealand. The Influence of Parental Income on Children’s Outcomes. Knowledge Management Group, 2002.
  78. Mohamed, Amr M. “Exploring the Potential of an AI-Based Chatbot (ChatGPT) in Enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Teaching: Perceptions of EFL Faculty Members.” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 3, Feb. 2024, pp. 3195–217. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11917-z.
  79. Muttaqin, Syariful, and Hsueh-Hua Chuang. “Variables Affecting English-Medium Instruction Students’ Achievement: Results of a Multiple Regression Analysis.” International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 3, 2022, p. 100152. DOI.org(Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100152.
  80. Nason, Biitikoro & Muhammad, Tukur & Rahim, Abdul & Extension, Kiu Publication. (2023). Influence of Family Income Level on Academic Performance Among Secondary School Students of Kitswamba and Rugendabara-Kikongo Town Councils, Kasese District, Uganda. 9. 117- 128.
  81. Nešić, Ivana, and Kimeta Hamidovic. “Developing A Scale for Assessing Communicative  Competence of Students Learning English for Specific Purposes.” Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, no. 0, Dec. 2022, pp. 481–92. espeap.junis.ni.ac.rs, https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2203481N.
  82. Nithideechaiwarachok, Bussayarat, et al. “Exploring English Language Proficiency, English Language Problems, and English Needs Among First Year Undergraduate Students.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 21, no. 12, Dec. 2022, pp. 273–90. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.12.15.
  83. Perkins, Mike, Leon Furze, Jasper Roe, and Jason MacVaugh. “The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment.” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol. 21, 2024, https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36.
  84. Peters HE, Mullis NC. The role of family income and sources of income in adolescent achievement. Consequences of growing up poor. 1997: 340-81.
  85. Pushpananda, W.M. 2016. Attitudes and motivation of undergraduates towards learning English as a Second Language. 2nd International Conference on the Humanities (ICH 2016), 06th - 07th October, Faculty of Humanities, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
  86. Ramos, Angelou , and Gregerlin Lambenicio. “English Oral Discourse Competence of College Students: A Focus on Factors Assessment.” Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 6, no. 9, 2023, pp. 1-12, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7529968.
  87. Romero, Ronald D., et al. “A Phenomenological Investigation of Senior High School Learners with Low English Language Proficiency.” Journal of English as A Foreign Language Teaching and Research, vol. 3, no. 1, Mar. 2023,pp. 1–13. journals.researchsynergypress.com, https://doi.org/10.31098/jefltr.v3i1.1148.
  88. Rosenthal. R. and Jacobson. L. (1968) Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Holt
  89. Saihi, Afef, et al. “A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of Generative AI Chatbots Adoption among Students and Educators in Higher Education.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, Dec. 2024, p. 100274. ScienceDirect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100274.
  90. Salam, Md. Abdus. A Critical Evaluation of Stephen Krashen’s Input Hypothesis in Second Language Learning and Teaching. 2024.
  91. Salvador, Robert, et al. Communicative Competence of Senior High School Students: Basis for Remedial Program in English. Jan. 2023, pp. 746–50, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7503939.
  92. Santos, Annie, et al. “English Language Proficiency in the Philippines: An Overview.” International Journal of English Language Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, July 2022, pp. 46–51. DOI.org    (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2022.4.3.7.
  93. Sarsenbaev, D. “Teacher-Student Interaction and Communicative Competence”. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, Dec. 2023, pp. 285-91, doi:10.37547/mesmj-V4-I6-40.
  94. Savignon, Sandra J. Communicative Competence: An Experiment in Foreign Language Teaching. Center for Curriculum Development, 1972.
  95. Şengönül T (2022). A Review of the Relationship between Parental Involvement and Children’s Academic Achievement and the Role of Family Socioeconomic Status in this Relationship. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2022, 32 -57
  96. Sun, Huaxi. The Influence of Teacher Expectation on Students’ Achievement of Different Grades: 2021. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211220.183.
  97. The Professional Importance of Grammar and How It Should Be Taught – PIT Journal. https://pitjournal.unc.edu/2023/01/12/the-professional-importance- of-grammar-and-how-it-should-be-taught/. Accessed 2 Jan. 2025.
  98. Tiwari, Trilok Datt. (2021). Classroom Interaction in Communicative Language Teaching of Public Secondary Schools in Nepal. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 373-386
  99. Toprak, Tugba. The Natural Approach. 2019, pp. 127–42.
  100. Ursolino, Rosalie “Second Language Acquisition and Communicative Competence Among Grade 7 Learners.” Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 13, no. 7, 2023, pp. 644-649, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8357378.
  101. V. Sosas, Rowena. “Technology in Teaching Speaking and Its Effects to Students Learning English.” Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, June 2021, pp. 958–70. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.66.
  102. Venjie Oclaret. Impact of Academic Intrinsic Motivation Facets on Students’ Academic   Performance. 2021. DOI. Org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16764.46723.
  103. Vetorico, Marivic. (2023). Lexical and Syntactic Competence of College Freshman Students in a Philippine State University. 10.17605/OSF.IO/CP4NJ.
  104. Warrick, Andrew. “The Effect of Feedback Styles on Students’ Willingness to Communicate in English.” Proceedings of The World Conference on Research in Education, vol. 1, no. 1, May 2024, pp. 28–34. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.33422/worldcre.v1i1.248.
  105. Zhang, C., Zhu, W., Dai, J., Wu, Y., and Chen, X. “Drivers and Concerns of Adopting Artificial Intelligence in Managerial Accounting.” Accounting & Finance, 2025.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic