Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 42 no. 4 (2025)

A Comparative Analysis of STEM Education Initiatives in the Philippines and Taiwan

Elmer Ihalon | Jonel Garma | Zaida Marie Tambis | Dhimna Pacifico -Geganto | Jeanny Zille Centino | Anthony Piliotas | Cristie Ann Jaca

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Implementing Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education in the education system is fundamental to strengthening students' skills and capabilities. This study analyzed the initiatives implemented in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education in the Philippines and Taiwan based on the research objectives of this study. A qualitative research design employing a comparative review was used to analyze the data critically. Selected published research in policy documents and program reports in STEM education initiatives in the Philippines and Taiwan from 2016 to 2024 was analyzed. The study found that the Philippines' STEM initiatives in policy implementation are to strengthen STEM education in the basic curriculum, while in Taiwan, they are to enhance scientific literacy and promote STEM careers. Regarding student outcomes, both countries have utilized assessment methods to showcase the various strategies used to examine students' performance. It was also noted that the Philippines and Taiwan have advanced in STEM education but experience diverse gaps. Based on the significant findings, the researchers concluded that Taiwan and the Philippines have committed to strengthening and advancing their STEM education implementation and demonstrated promising improvement opportunities. Thus, continually enhancing curriculum relevance and strengthening teacher professional development will make the implementation of STEM education robust in both countries' educational systems.



References:

  1. Antipolo, A. M. R., & Rogayan, D. V. J. (2021). Filipino prospective teachers’ experiences in teaching in K12 science curriculum: Cross-sectional research. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i1.15468
  2. Arnado, A. A., Pene, A. J. P., Fuentes, C. J. F., & Astilla, K. M. (2022). Fostering Sustainable STEM Education: Attitudes and Self-efficacy Beliefs of STEM Teachers in Conducting Laboratory Activities. 3(1), 54–74. https://www.ijses.net/index.php/ijses/article/download/33/pdf
  3. Arnilla, A. K. A., & Banga, A. (2018). Possibilities and Challenges for STEM Methodology in the Public Senior High Schools in the Philippines.
  4. Arinto, P. B. (2016). Curriculum reform and its impact on STEM education in the Philippines. Journal of Education and Development, 3(2), 145-160
  5. Aslam, S., Alghamdi, A. A., Abid, N., & Kumar, T. (2023). Challenges in Implementing STEM Education: Insights from Novice STEM Teachers in Developing Countries. Sustainability, 15(19), 14455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914455
  6. Baker, T. (2024, March 29). The Global Distribution of STEM Graduates: Which Countries Lead the Way? Center for Security and Emerging Technology. https://cset.georgetown.edu/article/the-global-distribution-of-stem-graduates-which-countries-lead-the-way/
  7. Catedrilla, J. M., De La Cuesta, J. M., & Caguiat, M. R. R. (2019). Impact of the STEM Program on Information Technology College Students’ Goals: Perspectives from the Philippines. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computers in Education; Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337768650
  8. Chuang, B. (2024, March 14). Taiwan initiates programs to attract STEM students globally, enriching the semiconductor talent pool. DIGITIMES ASIA. https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20240312PD200/taiwan-stem-education-semiconductor-talent.html
  9. Estonanto, A. J. J. (2017). Acceptability and Difficulty of the STEM Track Implementation in Senior High School. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Volume 5(No. 2), 43–50.
  10. Gatan, P. R. G., Yangco, R., & Monterola, S. L. (2021). Relationships among Environmental Literacy, Locus of Control, and Future Orientation of STEM Students in the Philippines. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10984
  11. Han, S. Y., & Carpenter, D. (2014). Construct Validation of Student Attitude toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Project Based Learning: The Case of Korean Middle Grade Students. In Middle Grades Research Journal (Vols. 9–9, Issue 3, pp. 27–41). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292146579
  12. Hite, R., & Milbourne, J. (2018). A proposed conceptual framework for K–12 STEM master teacher (STEMMaTe) development. *Education Sciences, 8(4), Article 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040218
  13. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research (Vol. 500). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  14. Honrado, L. C., & Calimlim, A. D. (2021). Assessment of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Strand of the K-12 Program among Selected Public Schools in Zone 2 Division of Zambales. International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 2(10), 870–881. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.10.03
  15. Huang, C. H., & Kuo, C. G. (2015). High scope project in Taiwan provides students both career exploration and preparation for further study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1798-1803.
  16. Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., Rauf, A., & Amnah, R. (2014). A review of science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) education research from 1999-2013: A Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a
  17. Kang, H. J., Farber, M., & Mahovsky, K. A. (2021). Teachers’ Self-Reported Pedagogical Changes: Are We             Preparing Teachers for Online STEM Education? In Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice     (Vol. 21, Issue 10, pp. 264–266).
  18. Ku, C.-J., & Lin, K.-Y. (2022). Status and Trends of STEM Education in Taiwan. In Status and Trends of STEM Education in Highly Competitive Countries: Country Reports and International Comparison (p. Taipei). Technological and Vocational Education Research Center (TVERC).
  19. Lee, M. H., Chai, C. S., & Hong, H. Y. (2018). STEM Education in Asia Pacific: Challenges and Development. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0424-z
  20. Lin, K. Y., & Williams, P. J. (2015). Taiwanese Preservice Teachers’ Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Teaching Intention. International Journal of Science and Mathematical Education/International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9645-2
  21. Lin, C., Huang, J., & Lin, R. (2021). From STEAM to CHEER: A Case Study of Design Education Development in Taiwan. Education Sciences, 11(4), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040171
  22. Lin, K. Y., Yu, K. C., Hsiao, H. S., Chu, Y. H., Chang, Y. S., & Chien, Y. H. (2015). Design of an assessment system for collaborative problem solving in STEM education. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0038-x
  23. Li, J., Mau, W. C. J., Chen, S. J., Lin, T. C., & Lin, T. Y. (2021). A qualitative exploration of STEM career development of high school students in Taiwan. Journal of Career Development, 48(2), 120-134.
  24. Lin, T. (2016). Reigniting the passion for learning: A systematic attempt in Taipei. Springer Science+Business Media, 11(3), 356-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03397127
  25. Ministry of Education Taiwan. (2017). Presentation on Taiwan’s high-scope project in the STEM education field. https://english.moe.gov.tw/cp-14-17157-7B5B8-1.html
  26. Ministry of Education Republic of China (Taiwan). (2024). Retrieved from. https://english.moe.gov.tw/mp-1.html
  27. Miranda, A. (2023). An inquiry into the importance of the link between Philippine industrial policy and the high school STEM track. Innovative Technology and Management Journal, Volume 6.
  28. Paderna, E. E. S., & Monterola, S. L. C. (2021). Advancing integrated STEM education in the Philippines through STEM curriculum implementation. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 127–143). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099888-7
  29. Park, W., Wu, J. Y., & Erduran, S. (2020). The nature of STEM disciplines in the science education standards documents from the USA, Korea, and Taiwan: Focusing on disciplinary aims, values, and practices. Science & Education, 29 (4), 899-927.
  30. Perez, J. C. S. (2020). A Scoping Review on the Implementation of Spiral Progression Approach. Journal of Academic Research, 01–1, 11–22.
  31. Perez, J. C. S., Bongcales, R. C. A., & Bellen, J. A. (2020). A Scoping Review on the Implementation of Spiral Progression Approach. Journal of Academic Research, 11–22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343304741
  32. PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). (2023). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en.html
  33. Race, R. (2023). K TO 12 EDUCATIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES: POLICY ANALYSIS AND REFORM. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374509879
  34. Reyes, M. C., & Castillo, M. P. (2020). The impact of teacher training programs on STEM education in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science and Technology, 8(2), 110-124.
  35. Ritz, J.M., Fan, SC. (2015). STEM and technology education: international state-of-the-art. Int J Technol Des Educ 25, 429–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9290-z
  36. Robiños, J. R. O., Alcazaren, H. K. G., & Marasigan, E. D. (2021). Graduate Perspectives on the Delivery of the Senior High School – Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Program. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal (Online)/IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal (Print), 3(4), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj204
  37. Rogayan, D. V., Rafanan, R. J. L., & De Guzman, C. Y. (2021). Challenges in STEM Learning: A Case of Filipino High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(2), 232. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v7i2.11293
  38. Thi Thanh Loan, T. (2019). STEM EDUCATION IN TAIWAN - LESSONS LEARNED FOR VIETNAM. In European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences (Vol. 7, Issue 12, p. 15). Progressive Academic Publishing, UK. https://www.idpublications.org
  39. Tupas, F. P., & Matsuura, T. (2019). Moving Forward in STEM Education, Challenges and Innovations in Senior High School in the Philippines: The Case of Northern Iloilo Polytechnic State College. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia/JPPI : Jurnal Perndidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19707
  40. Tytler, R. (2020). STEM Education for the Twenty-First Century. In Advances in STEM education (pp. 21–43). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_3
  41. Tzu-Bin, L. (2016). Reigniting the Passion for Learning: A Systematic Attempt in Taipei. Frontiers of Education in China, 11(3), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-005-016-0028-0
  42. Vuong, Q., La, V., Ho, M., Pham, T. M., Vuong, T., Vuong, H., & Nguyen, M. (2021). A data collection on secondary school students’ STEM performance and reading practices in an emerging country. Dialectical Anthropology, 3(2), 336-356. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00091
  43. Yang, CL., Yang, YC., Chou, TA., Wei, HY., Chen, CY., Kuo, CH. (2020). Case Study: Taiwanese Government Policy, STEM Education, and Industrial Revolution 4.0. In: Zintgraff, C., Suh, S., Kellison, B., Resta, P. (eds) STEM in the Technopolis: The Power of STEM Education in Regional Technology Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39851-4_9
  44. Yu, H. P., & Jen, E. (2020). Integrating Nanotechnology in the Science Curriculum for Elementary High-Ability Students in Taiwan: Evidenced-Based Lessons. Roeper Review, 42(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1690078
  45. Yang, CL., Yang, YC., Chou, TA., Wei, HY., Chen, CY., Kuo, CH. (2020). Case Study: Taiwanese Government Policy, STEM Education, and Industrial Revolution 4.0. In: Zintgraff, C., Suh, S., Kellison, B., Resta, P. (eds) STEM in the Technopolis: The Power of STEM Education in Regional Technology Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39851-4_9
  46. Yu, K. C., Wu, P. H., Lin, K. Y., Fan, S. C., Tzeng, S. Y., & Ku, C. J. (2021). Behavioral intentions of technology teachers to implement an engineering-focused curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00305-z
  47. Yu, H. P., & Jen, E. (2020). Integrating Nanotechnology in the Science Curriculum for Elementary High-Ability Students in Taiwan: Evidenced-Based Lessons. Roeper Review, 42(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1690078
  48. Wu, J. F. (2017). Teaching university students’ cultural diversity by means of multi-cultural picture books in Taiwan. Multicultural Education Review, 9(4), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615x.2017.1383812

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic