HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 3 no. 9 (2025)

Content-Based Instructional Module in Teaching Oral Communication in Context for Grade 11 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Senior High School Students

Milcah Shem V. Magsino

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study developed a content-based instructional module for teaching Oral Communication in Context to Grade 11 STEM Senior High School students. It aimed to (1) determine students’ communicative needs through needs analysis, (2) develop an instructional module based on these needs, (3) evaluate its quality, and (4) assess its acceptability to students. Using a descriptive method with purposive sampling, 30 respondents participated in the needs analysis, 32 in development and evaluation, and 161 in the acceptability test. Findings revealed that students’ preferred fields of study included Engineering, Nursing, Architecture, Medicine, and Biology. Desired topics emphasized decision making, critical analysis, independent thinking, problem solving, and negotiation. In skills development, public speaking ranked highest for speaking, sentence construction, and cohesion for reading, summarizing for writing, and listening for main ideas. The module evaluation by teachers and material developers showed high ratings across objectives (3.87), content (3.85), format and language (3.84), activities (3.80), and assessment (3.89). Students rated it acceptable in content (3.44), format and language (3.46), activities (3.43), and highly satisfactory in assessment (3.51). Overall, the module was positively received and ready for validation and try-out. Teachers are encouraged to use content-based activities to enhance students’ communicative competence further.



References:

  1. Alsalami, A. I. (2022). Challenges of short sentence writing encountered by First-Year Saudi EFL Undergraduate students. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.35 
  2. Canpolat, M., Kuzu, S., Yıldırım, B.,& Canpolat, S. (2015). Active listening strategies of academically successful university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 60,163-180. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.60.10 
  3. Crandall, J. A. (2000). Language teacher education.Annual review of applied linguistics. USA: Cambridge University
  4. Emanuel, R. (2011). Critical concerns for oral communication education in Alabama and beyond. Education Research International, 2011, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/948138 
  5. Fiocco, M. & Fleming, T. (2007). Developing communication skills: A continuous improvement approach. Brisbane, Queensland. http://aiec.idp.com/uploads/pdf/paper_Fiocco&Flemming.pdf 
  6. Last, S. (2016). Case study: The cost of poor communication. Grand Canyon University. https://tinyurl.com/4fhbpwkn 
  7. Nardo, M. T. B., & Hufana, E. R. (2014). Development and evaluation of modules in technical writing. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(6), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-6-2 
  8. Raja, F. (2017). Anxiety level in students of public speaking: Causes and remedies. Journal of Education and Educational Development. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4.
  9. Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Stevens, E., Park, S., & Vaughn, S. (2018). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in grades 3 through 12: 1978–2016. Hammill Institute on Disabilities, Vol. 40(3)(131 –149). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517749940 
  11. UCL. (2025, April 3). Student regulations for exams and assessments. Academic Manual. https://tinyurl.com/mvxjrr38