HomeInternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Researchvol. 6 no. 10 (2025)

Evaluating Teaching Efficiency among Filipino Teacher Interns: Insights for Enhancing Teacher Preparation and Advancing SDG 4 on Quality Education

Andrea P. Adigue

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study assesses the teaching effectiveness of Filipino teacher interns in post-pandemic classrooms, focusing on instructional strategies, stu-dent–teacher interactions, and pedagogical efficacy. Employing a quan-titative design with supplementary qualitative validation, data were col-lected from 24 teacher interns, 24 cooperating teachers, and 240 stu-dents in selected secondary schools under the supervision of DepEd Ca-banatuan and DepED Nueva Ecija. Standardized rating scales, structured interviews, and classroom observations were used to assess communi-cation proficiency, content knowledge, instructional material prepara-tion, assessment design, and teaching strategies. Findings revealed high teaching efficiency, especially in differentiated instruction, digital tool integration, and strong communication skills. However, gaps in adapta-bility and instructional alignment emerged, as cooperating teachers’ rat-ings were slightly lower than the interns' self-evaluations. These results underscore the importance of ongoing professional development to en-hance adaptive teaching and reflective self-evaluation, thereby aligning stakeholder expectations and advancing Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education).



References:

  1. American Educational Research Association,“Code of ethics for educational research,”AERA Press, 2019.
  2. A. Bryman, “Social research methods,” Oxford University Press, 4th ed., 2012.
  3. A. Field, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 5th ed., SAGE Publications, 2017
  4. A. P. Castro and R. M. Enriquez, “Challenges in implementing diverse assessment methods in language classrooms,” Journal of Philippine Teacher Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55-70, 2021.
  5. E. Bergsmann, M.-T. Schultes, P. Winter, B. Schober, and C. Spiel, “Evaluating teaching effectiveness: Approaches, measures, and implications,” Educational Research Review, vol. 16, pp. 35-49, 2015. Available online.
  6. H. Fives, D. Hamman, and A. Olivarez, “The role of efficacy beliefs in student teachers’ learning experiences,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 227-242, 2005. Available online.
  7. J. Cadosales, “Student teaching: Theory and practice,” Education Research Press, 2004.
  8. J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed., Sage Publications, 2014.
  9. J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, 2018
  10. J. Del Rosario and K. Santos, “Curriculum alignment and effective pedagogy in Philippine classrooms,” Academic Press, 2022.
  11. J. Fernandez and P. Cruz, “Adaptive teaching strategies in teacher preparation programs,” Philippine Journal of Education, vol. 18, pp. 54-70, 2018.
  12. L. Anderson and J. Stillman, “Making sense of mentoring in teacher education: A case study approach,” Teachers College Press, 2013.
  13. L. Darling-Hammond, “Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching,” Center for American Progress, 2010. Available online.
  14. L. M. Gonzales and C. P. Bautista, “Interdisciplinary approaches in language education: Challenges and opportunities,” Asia-Pacific Language Education Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 101-115, 2018.
  15. M. Gannaban, “Effective teaching strategies in language education,” Education Research Press, 2012.
  16. M. Quinco-Cadosales, “Teaching efficacy of elementary student teachers,” Education, vol.7, no. 1, pp. 10-15, 2017. Available online.
  17. P. Airasian and A. Gullickson, “Teacher evaluation for self-improvement,” Routledge,1997.
  18. P. Ashton and R. Webb, “Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and studentachievement,” in J. Quinco, Ed., Teacher Education Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 112-125, 2000.
  19. P. Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020.
  20. R. David and M. Cruz, “Mentoring perspectives in teacher education,” Philippine Educational Review, 2019
  21. R. Tupas, “The role of Filipino language in cultural identity formation,” Philippine Linguistics Journal, 2018.
  22. R. Garcia and L. Santos, “Effective evaluation methods in Filipino language instruction,”Oxford University Press, 2021
  23.  S. C. Ambag, “Assessment of Competency Level of Pre-Service Teachers Based on National Competency-Based Teacher Standards (NCBTS),” ResearchGate, 2015. Available online
  24. S. Krashen, Principles and practice in second language acquisition, Pergamon Press, 2009.
  25. Teaching Commons | DePaul University, “Teaching effectiveness,” Available online, n.d.
  26. T. Brown, “Educational assessment: Theory and practice,” Academic Press, 2018.
  27. T. Brown and M. Lee, “Constructivist approaches in language education,” Routledge, 2019.
  28. T. Brown and M. Lee, “Instructional adaptability in teacher education,” Routledge, 2019.
  29. T. Brown and M. Lee, “Innovative assessment strategies in language education,” Routledge, 2019.
  30. T. Brown and M. Lee, “Differentiated instruction and language pedagogy,” Routledge, 2020.
  31. UNESCO, “Quality education and sustainable development goals,” UNESCO Reports, 2019. Available online
  32. UNESCO, “The impact of COVID-19 on global education,” UNESCO Policy Briefs, 2021. Available online
  33. UNESCO, “Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology and education,”
  34. UNESCO Publishing, 2023.
  35. United Nations, “Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” 2015. Available online