Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 46 no. 1 (2025)

Influence of Preservice Training and In-Service Development Activities on the Self-Efficacy of Special Education Teachers

Frenyelle Zy Delima | Kristine Charles Dela Cerna | Domari Del Monte | Roselyn Budadong | Hazel Jade Huliganga

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

As inclusive education evolves, Special Education (SPED) teachers must possess foundational knowledge and engage in continuous professional development to address the needs of all their students. This study investigated the effect of preservice training and in-service development activities on the self-efficacy of special education teachers in specific public schools in General Santos City, Philippines. According to Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory, this study investigates the impact of two teacher training components on educators' competence and confidence in performing various special education-related tasks. A descriptive-correlational research approach was employed, and 48 special education teachers were randomly selected from a cohort of educators. We used a validated survey instrument to gather data on respondents' demographic characteristics, the extent of preservice and in-service training they had undergone, and their levels of self-efficacy in 10 critical domains of special education practice. We employed statistical methods, including the mean, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and t-tests, to analyze the data. The findings indicated that preservice training was substantial (M = 3.38). It concentrated extensively on identifying student needs but did little to prepare instructors for facilitating student advancement to the next grade level. Conversely, in-service development activities were identified as extensive (M = 4.17), particularly in mentorship and collaboration. Teachers' self-efficacy was assessed as exceptionally high (M = 4.15), with the highest confidence exhibited when working in partnership with support personnel. A statistically significant moderate positive connection (r = +0.61) existed between in-service development and self-efficacy. The link with preservice training (r = +0.26) was weak and not statistically significant. The findings indicate that preservice training provides teachers with a foundational understanding; however, continuous and specialized professional development is more beneficial in enhancing the self-efficacy of SPED instructors. The study suggests that both components must be strengthened to enhance inclusive education outcomes



References:

  1. Abela, R., Manaig, M., & Mamolo, L. (2025). Self-efficacy and learning experiences of preservice teachers in a state university. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 14(1), 163
  2. Allam, C., & Martin, P. (2021). Challenges and needs of special education teachers in inclusive classrooms: A Philippine perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1902452
  3. Allam, F. C., & Martin, M. M. (2021). Issues and challenges in special education: A qualitative analysis from teachers’ perspective. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 10(1), 37–49.
  4. Allam, F. C., & Martin, M. M. (2021). Issues and challenges in special education: A qualitative analysis from teachers’ perspective. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 10(1), 37–49.
  5. Ateş, Y. (2016). Special education teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs toward science course. Special Education International, 30(4), 241–250. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1236343.pdf
  6. Athabasca, A. (2014). Exploring challenges of the Individual Education Plan (IEP) process. http://dtpr.lib.athabascau.ca/action/download.php?filename=mais/700/KelliRonholmProject.pdf
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self‑efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
  9. Bhandari, P. (2020). Designing and analyzing Likert scales. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/likert-scale/
  10. Billingsley, B. S. (2004). Promoting teacher retention in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(5), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370050101
  11. Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What every special educator must know: Professional ethics and standards (7th ed.). CEC Publications.
  12. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  13. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
  14. Ergül, C., Baydik, B., & Demir, S. (2013). Opinions of in-service and preservice special education teachers on the competencies of the undergraduate special education programs. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 13(1), 518–522. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1324994518
  15. Florian, L. (2014). Reimagining special education: Why new approaches are needed. In L. Florian (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Special Education (2nd ed., pp. 9–22). SAGE Publications.
  16. Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). ‘Inclusive pedagogy: a framework for teacher development in special educational needs.’ Cambridge Journal of Education.
  17. Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
  18. Galevska, N. (2019). Challenges of teachers in the process of evaluation and grading. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 15, 94–99. http://www.epess.net/en/download/article-file/886064
  19. Hacıibrahimoğlu, B. Y., & Kargın, T. (2017). Determining the difficulties children with special needs experience during the transition to primary school. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17(5), 1487–1524. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.5.0135
  20. Hieneman, M., & Fefer, S. A. (2017). Employing the principles of positive behavior support to enhance family education and intervention. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(10), 2655–2668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0813-6
  21. Kasap, C. (2022). Investigating the experiences of preservice teachers in teaching students with special needs. European Journal of Special Education Research.
  22. Kincaid, D., & Fox, L. (2002). Person-centered planning and positive behavior support. In L. Hieneman & S. A. Fefer (2017), Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(10), 2655–2668.
  23. Leko, M. M., & Brownell, M. T. (2011). Considering the intersections of special education teacher preparation, research, and policy: A historical perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 32(3), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510397679
  24. Magallanes, C. A., Dulan, J. B. A., Masiado, P. E., Pasaol, K. F., & Ignacio, D. F. (2025). The experiences of SPED teachers from rural areas in handling students with special needs. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(8), 15–27.
  25. McDade, M. (2022). Why is assessment important? Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/assessment-guide-importance
  26. McLeskey, J., Barringer, M.-D., Billingsley, B., Brownell, M., Jackson, D., Kennedy, M., Lewis, T., Maheady, L., Rodriguez, J., Scheeler, M. C., Winn, J., & Ziegler, D. (2017). Collaboration and communication. In High-leverage practices in special education. https://granite.pressbooks.pub/edu606-701/chapter/collaboration/
  27. Miña, A. A. (2024). The lived experiences of special education teachers in teaching inclusive education. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(10), 1072–1090.
  28. Morin, A. J. S., et al. (2024). Prepared to ensure quality education for all? A comparative study of self-efficacy for inclusive teaching. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(5)
  29. Nagro, S. A., & deBettencourt, L. U. (2017). Reviewing special education teacher preparation field experience placements, activities, and research: Do we know the difference maker? Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(3), 7–33. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1921684197
  30. Sola-Özgüç, C. (2019). Preservice special education teachers’ experiences in the practice they perform in a guidance and research center. Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 20(4), 783–790. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.512951
  31. Taherdoost, H. (2020). What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design? Review different lengths of rating scale/attitude scale/Likert scale. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3588604
  32. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  33. Tschannen‑Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.Allam, F. C., & Martin, M. M. (2021). Issues and challenges in special education: A qualitative analysis from teachers’ perspective. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 10(1), 37–49.
  34. Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Burke Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007
  35. Yıldırım Hacıibrahimoğlu, B. (2022). Early childhood preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in inclusive education: A mixed-method investigation. Issues in Educational Research, 32(3), 1213–...Abaya, D. O. (2025). Teacher self-efficacy and stress in special education: Evidence from rural schools in CAR, Philippines. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(8), 494–502.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic