Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 45 no. 6 (2025)

Use of Technology in Teaching and Level of Learner Engagement in School Activities

Reshiel Olasiman | Ruel Duran

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the use of technology in teaching and level of learners’ engagement at Intavas Integrated School. It assessed the extent of technology integration in classroom instruction, the level of learner engagement in technology-enhanced activities, and the relationship between these variables. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed, involving 202 high school teachers who responded to a structured survey questionnaire. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Findings revealed that teachers frequently integrate digital tools—particularly computers, projectors, and online platforms—into their teaching. However, the use of interactive whiteboards and collaborative platforms remained relatively limited. Learners displayed strong engagement in technology-enhanced lessons, showing high levels of curiosity, adaptability, and motivation. Despite this, peer collaboration using digital tools was less emphasized. The analysis showed a strong positive correlation between technology use and learner engagement, confirming that increased technology integration leads to greater learner participation. In response to these findings, the study recommends intensified use of digital learning management systems such as Google Classroom, Moodle, and Microsoft Teams, as well as targeted training programs to enhance teacher competency in underutilized tools like interactive whiteboards and collaborative platforms. Additionally, schools should invest in reliable internet access and updated multimedia resources. Promoting structured digital collaboration and continuous professional development will ensure that technology is effectively used to foster learner engagement and improve educational outcomes.



References:

  1. Acuna, A., Juarez, A., & Vázquez, R. (2024). Educational innovations are supported by AI, VR, AR, and metaverse technologies. 2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Metaverse and Cybersecurity (ICAMAC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAMAC62387.2024.10829025
  2. Alegre, E. M. (2023). Technology-driven education: Analyzing the synergy among innovation, motivation, and learner engagement. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.1507
  3. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. Routledge.
  4. Brownson, C. (2015). Classroom participation and knowledge gain. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(23), 78–82.
  5. Cantoria, G. A., Espinola, M. M. R., & Gerona, J. P. S. (2024). Correlation of technology integration on learners' engagement towards learning outcomes: Basis for an action plan. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.12568
  6. Chuang, Y. (2014). Increasing learning motivation and student engagement through the technology-supported learning environment. Creative Education, 5(23), 1969–1978. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.523221
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  8. De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.
  9. Duterte, J. P. (2024). Innovations in distance education practices: A comprehensive review. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra18210
  10. Duterte, J. P. (2024). Innovations in distance education practices: A comprehensive review. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra18210
  11. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  12. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192.
  13. Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The impact of digital technology on learning: A summary for the education endowment foundation. Education Endowment Foundation.
  14. Hutasuhut, I. F., & Harahap, H. D. (2024). The influence of technology in the world of education. Edumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.54209/edumaniora.v3i01.39
  15. Idris, N. Z., & Azahari, M. H. (2024). The impact of information technology on middle school learner engagement. International Journal of Research in Education Humanities and Commerce. https://doi.org/10.37602/ijrehc.2024.5213
  16. Jha, M., Jha, S., Thakur, S., & Xu, J. (2022). Student engagement and learning through digital educational technology. 2022 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSDE56538.2022.10089226
  17. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. The New Media Consortium.
  18. Khalili, M., & Ostafichuk, P. M. (2018). Improving class participation by using an online interactive platform. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.13095
  19. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is “enhanced” and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36.
  20. Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers' perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014
  21. Latif, S. (2016). Learning engagement in a virtual environment. International Journal of Computer Applications, 148(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.5120/IJCA2016911289
  22. Lee, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Enhancing learning engagement through personalized learning in K–12 classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9333-4
  23. Maciag, T. (2024). A personal retrospective in exploring educational technologies to aid increasing student engagement: Tales from pre-COVID-19, during the pandemic, & beyond. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2023.17018
  24. Malik, R. (2023). Impact of technology-based education on student learning outcomes and engagement. 2023 10th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), 784–788.
  25. Meisuri, S. (2024). Evaluation of the effect of teacher training on the use of technology in teaching. International Journal of Research in Education and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.37602/ijrehc.2024.5213
  26. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  27. Mourya, S., & Singh, P. (2022). Effective ways of using technology in teaching. International Journal of Education Technology and Research. https://doi.org/10.528c655931185ed69393326c012f1c25
  28. Msambwa, M. M., Wen, Z., & Daniel, K. (2025). The impact of AI on the personal and collaborative learning environments in higher education. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12909
  29. Nordin, N., Idris, I., & Shamsuddin, N. (2023). Special education classrooms: Can technology use inspire creativity? Journal of Inclusive Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.239eb648f75f5f7088908041abc7899c
  30. Pan, S. (2024). Research on teaching strategies of immersive experiential teaching for collaborative learning in elementary and middle schools based on AI and VR. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2024.080503
  31. Radebe, F., & Nel, L. (2016). Effective integration of a student response system in an undergraduate computer science classroom: An active-engagement instructional strategy. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 978–3-319-47680-3_9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47680-3_9
  32. Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2007). Using technology-enhanced learning environments to support problem-based historical inquiry in secondary school classrooms. Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(1), 123-160.
  33. SETDA. (2010). National educational technology trends 2010: Innovation through state leadership. State Educational Technology Directors Association. https://www.setda.org
  34. Shankar, A. U., Tewari, V., Rahman, M., Mishra, A., & Bajaj, K. K. (2023). Impact of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in education. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology. https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i4.1014
  35. Sharki, J., Al Balushi, G., Maran, P., Ibrahim, M., Jabri, A. A., Palarimath, S., & Balakumar, C. (2024). Incorporating artificial intelligence-powered immersive realities to improve learning using virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technology. 2024 3rd International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC), 760–765. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAAIC60222.2024.10575046
  36. Teo, T. (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312.     
  37. UCISA. (2016). UCISA 2016 survey of technology-enhanced learning for higher education in the UK. Universities and Colleges Information Systems Association.
  38. Weller, P. (2018). Breaking the technology barrier: Using technology in education. The Agricultural Education Magazine, 81(4), 23. Retrieved from https://consensus.app/papers/breaking-the-technology-barrier-using-technolgoy-in-wellert/54a5f836b0f95b5397fc303f5b5ce7db/?utm
  39. Wibowo, G. A., Karim, A. A., Hasan, S. H., & Ruhimat, M. (2023). Use of technology in active learning: Increasing learner interaction and engagement. Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World. https://doi.org/10.55849/alhijr.v2i4.539
  40. Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities, and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.
  41. Zhang, P., Zhao, P., & Kim, J. (2024). Assessing the learner’s engagement through virtual classroom and teaching pedagogy: The mediating role of technology usage. Communicate. https://doi.org/10.58262/v32i78.2
  42. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840.
  43. Zimu, Y. (2024). Examining the relationship between teacher self-efficacy and learner engagement in technology-enhanced learning environments. International Journal of New Developments in Education. https://doi.org/10.25236/ijnde.2024.060219

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic