Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 45 no. 6 (2025)

Incentive Scheme and Level of Learners’ Involvement in the Classroom

Marive Geraldizo Patierez | Elpedio Yabo Lomarda

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to find the effects of incentive scheme on learners in the classroom at Kiara National High School, Don Carlos, Bukidnon, during the School Year 2024-2025.This study employed a descriptive-correlational research methodology to investigate the impacts of an incentive scheme in the classroom. The findings demonstrated that learners are highly motivated by prizes, monetary rewards, and unique privileges as incentives. Another finding revealed that learners place a high value on communication in the classroom, and they also demonstrate a high level of engagement in volunteering within the classroom and during the learning process. The findings also show that reward systems have a considerable impact on students' engagement in the classroom. The findings of the study confirm that incentive schemes significantly impact learners' involvement in the classroom. The positive correlation across all variables indicates that incorporating incentives such as prizes, money, or privileges enhances students' motivation and active participation. Therefore, the null hypothesis, which claims that "there is no important link between incentive programs and students' participation in the classroom," is dismissed, confirming that reward-based strategies are effective in encouraging classroom engagement. These recommendations advise that educational institutions and educators create structured reward systems that include prizes, monetary incentives, and unique benefits. These awards should be consistent with educational goals, delivered equally, and relevant to students. In addition, combining extrinsic rewards with intrinsic motivators, such as cultivating a passion for learning and personal improvement, can result in a more balanced approach to long-term motivation. To build on this positive dynamic, educators should prioritize tactics that promote open communication and active participation, such as collaborative exercises, group discussions, and chances for student feedback. Creating a supportive environment in which students feel appreciated and heard can boost their engagement and motivation. Additionally, including interactive technologies and building an inclusive culture can ensure long-term engagement and learning success.



References:

  1. Antony-Newman, M. (2019). “Learner Involvement of Immigrant Parents: A Meta-synthesis.” Educational Review71 (3): 362–381.
  2.  Amabile and Gitomer (2019). Psychological Characteristics of Primary School Students of General Secondary School. View of psychological characteristics of primary school students of General Secondary School 2022,
  3. Aypay A. (2018). Is reward a punishment? from reward addiction to sensitivity to punishment. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 2018, 5(2): 1-11.
  4. Bakker et al., (2017). The Chicago Parent Program: Comparing 1- year outcomes for African American and Latino parents of young children. Research in Nursing & Health, 35, 475–489.
  5. Bartolome, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1207994 M. T., Mamat, N., & Masnan, A. H. (2017). ERIC - EJ1207994 - Student Involvement in the Philippines: A Review of Literatures, International Journal of Early Childhood Education and Care, 2017. ERIC - EJ1207994 - Student Involvement in the Philippines: A Review of Literatures, International Journal of Early Childhood Education and Care, 2017.
  6. Bird, (2017. The impact of a holistic conditional cash transfer program in New York City on parental financial investment, student time use, and educational processes and outcomes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 334–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1107925
  7. Barger, M. (2019). “The   Relation between Parents’ Involvement in Children’s Schooling and Children’s Adjustment: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 145 (9): 855–890.
  8. Beralde M. (2019). Reducing Student Absenteeism through Strategic Reward and Penalty System among Senior High Students of Dagatan National High School. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 2019, 3(2). 
  9. Bettencourt, A. F., Gross, D., & Breitenstein, S. (2018). Evaluating implementation fidelity of a school-based program for low- income families. The Journal of School Nursing.
  10. Biglan, A. (2017). The nurture effect: How the science of human behavior can improve our lives and our world. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.
  11. Bunijevac, (2017). Parental Involvement as a Important Factor for Successful Education. Retrived from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1156936.pdf
  12. Cahyadi, N., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., Prima, R. A., Satriawan, E., & Syamsulhakim, E. (2018). Cumulative impacts of conditional cash transfer programs: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. (No. w24670). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  13. Chetty, & Chu, (2018). The impacts of neighborhoods on inter-generational mobility I: Childhood exposure effects. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133, 1107–1162.
  14. Christie, (2018).  More evidence on the impact of India’s conditional cash transfer program, Janani Suraksha Yojana: Quasi-experimental evaluation of the ef- fects on childhood immunization and other reproductive and child health outcomes. PLoS One, 9. 
  15. Chen, and Bruence (2018). Can 'reward and punishment' improve student motivation? Semantic Scholar.
  16. Cheng, (2019). Adolescent development of the reward system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
  17. Cherry K. (2022). Understanding intrinsic motivation. Verywell Mind, 2022. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-intrinsic-motivation-279538
  18. Crosnoe, R., and R. W. Ressler. 2019. “Communicating the Child in School.” Handbook of Parenting. Volume 5. The Practice of Communicating, M. H. Bornsteinedited by. (3rd, 410–430. Abingdon: Routledge.
  19. Dehass, (2018).  Effects of Learners Corps in prekindergarten on child mental health and academic performance: Follow-up of a randomized clinical trial     through 8 years of age. JAMA Pediatrics, 170, 1149–1155.
  20. Delgado,P. (2019, October 22). The Importance of Learner Involvement in Teaching — Observatory | Institute for the Future of Education. Observatory | Institute for the Future of Education.
  21. Dempsey, (2022). Adapted Hoover-Dempsey & Sandler Model of Parental Involvement: School/Teacher Version Questions. Adapted Hoover- Dempsey & Sandler Model of Parental Involvement: School/Teacher Version Questions. Retrieved September 23, 2022
  22. Dumas, J. E., Moreland, A., French, B., & Pearl, A. (2017). Effects of monetary incentives on engagement in the PACE parenting pro- gram. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39, 302–313.
  23. Duncan, G., Huston, A. C., & Weisner, T. S. (2007). Higher ground: New hope for working families and their children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  24. Duncan, G., Magnuson, K., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2014). Boosting family income to promote child development. The Future of Children, 24, 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2014.0008
  25. Franken (2019). The effect of rewards on student motivation - studia psy paed.
  26. Garcia, https://digitalcommons. unl. edu/cehsdiss/304/ A. S. (2018, May 1). Parental Involvement Among Low-income Filipinos: A Phenomenological Inquiry. Digital Commons @ University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Retrived from:  https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsdiss/304/
  27. Gordon and Lewis (2019). Enrollment and attendance in a parent training prevention program for conduct problems. Prevention Science, 12, 126–138.
  28. Gustafson F. (2020). The physical, social & emotional characteristics of high school students. How To Adult, 2020.
  29. Lavy, (2022).  Developmental milestones in middle school. Understood, 2022.
  30. Lawrence, (2019). Parent perceptions of elementary classroom management systems and their children’s motivational and emotional responses. Social Psychology of Education, 2020, 23(2): 433-448.
  31. Mcleod S. (2020). Study Guides for Psychology Students - Simply Psychology, 2020.
  32. Piaget, J. (2015). Parenting with the Child Development Stages of Jean Piaget. Motherhood. Retrieved from: https://motherhoodinpointoffact.com/child-development-stages-of-jean-piaget/
  33. Robble A M. (2022).  Dopamine and addiction. Annual Review of Psychology, 2022, 71(1): 79-106.
  34. Sudderth (2022).  The Relationship Between Parental and Family Involvement and Student Success.
  35. Tus, (2021, June 13). Amidst the online learning in the philippines: The Parental Involvement and Its Relationship to the Student’s Academic Performance | International Engineering Journal for Research & Development.
  36. Russiian, (2019). A longitudinal study on activation to behaviors of reward. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2021).
  37.  Utami, (2022). Students' and teachers' perception on reward in online English            teaching context. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 2022, 4(3). 303 https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.27923
  38. Waddle, and Duff (2018). Pros and cons of reward systems for primary school’s infographic - e-learning infographics.
  39. William Jeynes, (2022). Relational Aspects of Parental Involvement to Support Educational Outcomes.
  40. Webster, (2019). Brain reward system. Brain Reward System - Simply Psychology, 2019.
  41. Yu Y, & Y Zhang Y, (2021). Personality and developmental characteristics of primary school students’ personality types. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021,
  42. Zaff, & Chen, (2017). “Factors that Promote High School Graduation: A Review of the Literature.” Educational Psychology Review 29 (3): 447–476. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9363-5

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic