HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 24 no. 5 (2024)

English Teachers’ Strategies and Students’ Writing Performance

Sarah Nemenzo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to assess the level of writing performance of Maritime freshmen students and teachers’ strategies in handling English 1 classes in the College of Maritime Education. The descriptive-correlational analysis method was used in this research. The respondents of the study were the bona fide Maritime freshmen students enrolled in Bachelor of Science in Maritime Transportation, Bachelor of Science in Marine Engineering in the University of the Visayas, and English teachers assigned in the College of Maritime Education handling English 1 classes. The instrument utilized in the study was a researcher made questionnaire. The study revealed that the in the utilization of various teaching strategies in writing skills, the use of graphic organizers got the highest rank, followed by blue printing, and then peer talk. The least as ranked by the faculty were timeline, story starter, and simulation of games. The study further revealed that the Maritime freshmen students’ level of writing performance as to vocabulary, 97.01% was identified as poor; 0.25% was identified as excellent, good, and satisfactory; and 2.24% was identified as unsatisfactory. For the level of writing performance as to sentence construction, 25.12% was identified as excellent; 18.41% was identified as very good; 17.91% was identified as good; 18.66% was identified as satisfactory; 8.71% was identified as unsatisfactory; and 11.19% was identified as poor. For the level of writing performance as to paragraph development, 88.31% was identified as poor; 1.24% was identified as good; 5.72% was identified as satisfactory; and 4.73% was identified as unsatisfactory. Nevertheless, the final grade obtained in English 1 classes was 2.7 identified as fair; 8.96% of the respondents’ final grade was very good; 38.81% obtained a final grade as good; 41.2% obtained a final grade as fair; and 10.95% obtained a final grade of passed. However, the correlation of writing performance and final grade showed insignificant relationship, hence, all hypotheses were not rejected. The facilitating factors that influenced the teaching of writing skills were teachers’ commitment, administration support and student’s interest in writing. While the hindering factors were classroom non-conducive for learning, mass admission, lack of administration support, and heavy teaching load. In view of the findings and conclusion of the study, a program design is recommended to enhance the writing performance of maritime freshmen students which is beneficial to both students in the College of Maritime Education and English teachers as well.



References:

  1. Black, J.  (1991).  Performance in English Skills Courses and Over all Academic Achievement. Retrieved July 9, 2018 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ441446.pdf
  2. Buscemi, V. S. (2002). A reader for developing writers. New York: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
  3. Cabellon, A. B. (2011). The Modular Intervention On Composition Writing (Unpublished Thesis from The University of the Visayas, Cebu City) Retrieved January 16, 2018.
  4. Cabonilla, H. R. (2015). English Language Proficiency of Senior College Student (Unpublished Thesis from the University of the Visayas, Cebu City) Retrieved January 19,2018
  5. Chin, Beverly Ann. (2000). The role of grammar in improving student writing. William H. Sadlier, Inc., Retrieved January 21, 2018 from people,uwplatt.edu.>-ciesield>graminw.
  6. Farooq, M. S. and Ul-Hassan, M. U. (2012), Opinion of Second Language Learners about Writing Difficulties in English Language. South Asian Studies, A Research Journal of South Asian Studies (Vol. 27, No. 1, January –June pp. 183-184)  Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265561270_Opinion_of_Second_Language_Learners_about_Writing_Difficulties_in_English_Language [accessed Jul 11 2018].
  7. Freeman & Freeman. (2004). Focused freewriting. Retrieved December 17, 2017 from http://writing2.richmond.edu/wac/freewrit.html
  8. Freeman & Freeman. (2004). Focused freewriting. Retrieved December 17, 2017 from http://writing2.richmond.edu/wac/freewrit.html
  9. Galigao, R. P. (2009). The English Language Competence of Graduating Students of the University of the Visayas: A Training Design (Unpublished Dissertation Paper from the University of the Visayas Cebu, City) Retrieved February 4,2018.
  10. Girdharan, B. (2012). Identifying Gaps in Academic Writing of ESL Students. US-China Education Review A 6 (2012) 578-587 Earlier title: Retrieved July 9, 2018 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535491.pd
  11. Grafen, G. (1996). Scientific articles, types and organization of texts. Frankfurt/M. Lang.
  12. Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17-29
  13. Jacaba, V. (2015). Photo Essay: Structural and Thematic Analyses. (Unpublished Thesis from University of the Visayas, Cebu, City)
  14. Journal of maritime transport and engineering. (2012). vol. 1, no. 1. Latvian Maritime Academy Research Institute Lithuanian Maritime Academy. Retrieved December 8,2017 from www.latja.lv/wp-content/uploads/files/ZinatRakstuKrajumi/Publikacija.pdf
  15. Kalandadze, M. (2007). English academic writing., Europe: CCS
  16. Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
  17. Malouff, J., Rooke, S., et.al.(2018). Simple strategies academics can use to help students improve their writing skills. School of Behavioural, Cognitive and Social Sciences, University of New England. Retrieved February 10, 2018 from htpp://www.une.edu.au>news-and-events
  18. Methner, G. V. (2013). Perceptions of administrative support and follower readiness in middle school teachers (Dissertation Paper) Retrieved 7-9-2018 from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/bgsu1383582751/inline
  19. Monitor model. TesoLclass.com. Retrieved Feb.2, 2018 from http://www.tesolclass.com/applying-sla-theories/monitor-model/
  20. Pirsl, D. et. al. (2011). Writing skills at university level.
  21. Saddler, B. & Preschern, J. (2014). Improving sentence writing ability through sentence combining practice. Retrieved January 19, 2018 from http://researchgate.net/publication28799712
  22. Sahbaz, K. N., & Duran, G. (2001). The efficiency of cluster method in improving creative writing skills of students. Turkey International Journal
  23. Sedita, Joan,.2015. Sentence combining. Literacy Lines. Retrieved February 6, 2018 from https://keystoliteracy.com/blog/sentence-combining/
  24. Sentence combining: Teaching rules of sentence structure by doing. Retrieved January 22, 2018 from http://www.interventioncentral.org/academic-interventions/writing/sentence-combining-teaching-rules-sentence-structure-doing
  25. STWC guide for seafarers.2010.Retrieved November 3,2017 from www.mptusa.com.>STWC_guide_english
  26. Tinig ng marino. (2010). Upgrading of maritime education. Internet Edition 2012. Retrieved November 3,2017 from http://www.ched.gov.ph/statistics/upgrading of maritime education.
  27. Tocmo, C. S. (2014). Writing Assessment: A Developing Tool from Existing Instruments (Unpublished Thesis from University of the Visayas, Cebu, City)
  28. Triza, R., Kristiawan, M., Johari, I., & Asvio, N. (2016). The effect of clustering technique towards students writing skills of narrative text in high school 5 Pariaman, West Sumatera. Research Journal of Social Sciences. January 28, 2016. Retrieved February 4, 2018 from Journal home page: http:/www.aensiweb.com/RJSS.
  29. Weaver, C. (1998). Lessons to Share on Teaching Grammar in Context. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.