HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 24 no. 5 (2024)

Comparative Analysis of Local Government Units in Southeast Asian Nations

Isagani Tano

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the organizational structures, financial capacities, citizen engagement mechanisms, technology utilization, and common challenges faced by Local Government Units (LGUs) across Southeast Asian nations. Drawing insights from a diverse range of scholarly works, including books, theses, published dissertations, and electronic journals, the research investigates key dimensions that shape local governance dynamics in the region. The investigation into organizational structures delves into the nuances of centralization vs. decentralization, federal structures, hierarchical frameworks, policy harmonization, and community engagement practices. The study uncovers how these structural variances impact the efficiency and effectiveness of local governance. Examining financial capacities and resource management practices, the research reveals substantial differences among LGUs in terms of the system of government and the subdivision of state. This prompts a call for tailored fiscal policies and collaborative initiatives to optimize resource utilization and financial autonomy. Citizen engagement mechanisms emerge as a focal point, with a notable emphasis placed on fostering inclusive decision-making processes. The study finds a high commitment to citizen involvement within Southeast Asian LGUs, urging continued support for transparent and responsive local governance. Technological adoption and digital strategies come under scrutiny, highlighting disparities, diverse adoption rates, and an increasing embrace of digital communication strategies. Recommendations include addressing digital divides and promoting comprehensive digital strategies for efficient public service delivery and citizen engagement. Finally, the study explores common challenges faced by LGUs in Southeast Asian nations, such as corruption, political dynamics, and capacity constraints. It underscores the interconnected nature of these challenges, emphasizing the need for holistic solutions and comprehensive reforms to strengthen governance structures. This research contributes to the existing literature by synthesizing insights from various sources, providing a nuanced understanding of local governance in Southeast Asia. Policymakers, researchers, and practitioners can leverage these findings to inform strategic interventions, foster collaboration, and promote effective governance practices across the region.



References:

  1. Ahmed, H. (2020). Corporate governance and Shariah non-compliant risk in Islamic banks: evidence from Southeast Asia. Retrieved from Emerald Insights: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CG-05-2019-0138/full/html
  2. Asuncion, V. (2023). 3: State of ICT-Use within the Local Climate E-Governance in Metro Manila, Philippines. Retrieved from Bristol University: https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/edcollchap/book/9781529222920/ch003.xml
  3. Bitonio, E. (2022). Social dialogue in the Public Services in selected ASEAN countries: A comparative overview of the laws, institutions and practices in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Retrieved from Econstor: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/263128
  4. Breslin, S. (2020). Who Governs and How? Non-State Actors and Transnational Governance in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from Taylor Francis Group: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429289484-1/governs-non-state-actors-transnational-governance-southeast-asia-shaun-breslin-helen-nesadurai
  5. Chua, A. (2021). An analysis of national action plans on antimicrobial resistance in Southeast Asia using a governance framework approach. Retrieved from The Lancet Global Health: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(20)30084-5/fulltext
  6. Credo, J. (2022). City Diplomacy amid Regional Integration: A Philippine Perspective on the ASEAN Smart Cities Network. Retrieved from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS): https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jovito-Katigbak/publication/362421311_City_Diplomacy_amid_Regional_Integration_A_Philippine_Perspective_on_the_ASEAN_Smart_Cities_Network/links/62f0f56a505511283e9de817/City-Diplomacy-amid-Regional-Integration-A-Philip
  7. Gonzales, E. (2020). Governance in Southeast Asia: Governance in Southeast Asia: Issues and Options. Retrieved from Jica Journals: https://www.jica.go.jp/Resource/jica-ri/IFIC_and_JBICI-Studies/jica-ri/publication/archives/jbic/report/paper/pdf/rp16_e07.pdf
  8. Helen. (2020). Transnational Private Governance as a Developmental Driver in Southeast Asia: The Case of Sustainable Palm Oil Standards in Indonesia and Malaysia. Retrieved from Taylor Francis Group: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220388.2018.1536262
  9. Hirsch, P. (2020). Scaling the environmental commons: Broadening our frame of reference for transboundary governance in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from Wiley Online Library: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/apv.12253
  10. Hussain. (2020). IMPACT OF COUNTRY'S GOVERNANCE DIMENSIONS ON BANK REVENUE EFFICIENCY: OVERVIEW ON MIDDLE EAST, SOUTHEAST ASIA, AND SOUTH ASIA COUNTRIES. Retrieved from Ebsco: https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A4%3A18219476/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A142303112&crl=c
  11. Ide. (2020). New Waves of Decentralization in Southeast Asia: Analysis of Local Government Survey Data. Retrieved from Ide Jetro: https://www.ide.go.jp/English/Research/Project/2018/2018240025.html
  12. Lassa, J. (2020). The ASEAN’s Responses to COVID-19: A Policy Sciences Analysis. Retrieved from SSRN Journal: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3595012
  13. Maquito, F. (2022). Implications of Full Devolution on Vertical and Horizontal Gaps . Retrieved from Aisf: http://www.aisf.or.jp/aifdocs/vol_6B_11.pdf
  14. Nagai, F. (2019). Introduction: Analysis of Local government Survey in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from Ide: https://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Reports/InterimReport/2018/pdf/2018_2_40_025_ch01.pdf
  15. Nesadurai. (2020). New Constellations of Social Power: States and Transnational Private Governance of Palm Oil Sustainability in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from Taylor Francis Group: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429289484-2/new-constellations-social-power-helen-nesadurai
  16. Rasiah, R. (2019). Corruption and Good Governance. Retrieved from Jstor Journals: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26664253
  17. Rembeth, I. (2023). NDCs in ASEAN Countries: Dreams or Reality? Assessing Case Studies from Indonesia and the Philippines. Retrieved from SSRN Papers: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4550557
  18. Taylor, D. (2019). Hybrid Governance of Transboundary Commons: Insights from Southeast Asia. Retrieved from Taylor Francis Online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24694452.2019.1624148
  19. Tran, M. (2021). Governance and sustainability in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from Emerald Insights: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARJ-05-2019-0095/full/html
  20. Ulep, G. (2021). National multisectoral governance challenges of implementing the Philippines’ Reproductive Health Law. Retrieved from Health Policy and Planning: https://academic.oup.com/heapol/article/37/2/269/6338609
  21. Valdecanas, S. (2023). Engaging Stakeholders to Achieve the SDGS: The Case of the Province of Bataan. Retrieved from Archium Ateneo: https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1207&context=jmgs