HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 26 no. 6 (2024)

Teachers Challenges in the Conduct of Assessment and their Teaching Performance

Michelle Agawin | Reynilda C. Alferez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored the demographic characteristics of teachers, challenges faced in assessment practices, and their impact on teaching performance. The results showed a varied demographic profile, with the majority of teachers between the ages of 30 and 39, having Bachelor's Degrees, and having areas of specialization such as Science and Filipino. Notable challenges included preparing assessments, putting strategies into practice, encouraging student participation, and making good use of assessment feedback. Most teachers did well and showed high levels of satisfaction despite these challenges. The study also revealed that younger teachers faced greater challenges when it came to assessment. Specifically, there was a negative correlation between teaching performance and difficulties in using assessment feedback. In response, an action plan was suggested to improve teacher support and assessment planning. The study emphasized the necessity of focused interventions to address these issues, which enhanced assessment practices and lessened the workloads of teachers.



References:

  1. Acar-Erdol, T., & Yildizli, H. (2018). Classroom assessment practices of teachers in Turkey. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 587-602.
  2. Agayon, A. J. D., Agayon, A. K. R., & Pentang, J. T. (2022). Teachers in the new normal: challenges and coping mechanisms in secondary schools. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development (IJHED), 4(1), 67–75. doi:10.22161/jhed.4.1.8
  3. Ahmed, F., Ali, S., & Shah, R. A. (2019). Exploring variation in summative assessment: Language teachers' knowledge of students' formative assessment and Its effect on their summative assessment. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2), 109-119.
  4. Bawinile J. Mthanti & Prudence Msiza (2023) The roles of the school principals in the professional development of teachers for 21st century Education, Cogent Education, 10:2, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2267934
  5. Chun-Shou, L., & Fan, S. (2019, June 1). Developing classroom-based language assessment literacy for in-service EFL teachers: The gaps. Studies in Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.03.003
  6. Dagdag, J. (2020). Constructivism and the mathematics classroom assessments of elementary teachers. Journal of critical reviews. 7. 816-823. 10.31838/jcr.07.12.144.
  7. DeLuca, C., Willis, J., Harrison, C., & Coombs, A. (2019). Policies, programs, and practices: exploring the complex dynamics of assessment education in teacher education across four countries. Front. Educ. 4, 132. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00132
  8. DepEd. (2015, April 1). DO 8 s. 2015 - Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K–12 Basic Education Program
  9. DepEd. (2020, June 19). DO 12 s. 2020 – Adoption of the basic education learning continuity plan for school year 2020-2021 in light of the COVID-19 public heath emergency
  10. DepEd. (2020, October 1). DO 31 s. 2020 - Interim Guidelines for Assessment and Grading in Light of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan
  11. DeLuca, C., Willis, J., Harrison, C., Coombs, A., et al. (2019). Policies, programs, and practices: exploring the complex dynamics of assessment education in teacher education across four countries. Front. Educ. 4, 132. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00132
  12. Dube-Xaba, Z., & Xulu, R. (2020). Opportunities and challenges in school-based assessment: Tourism learners’ views. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 9(2), 1–15.
  13. Fatih, M. (2020). School principal support in teacher professional development. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 9(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2020.5158
  14. Foy, T., Dwyer, R., et al. (2019). Managing job performance, social support and work-life conflict to reduce workplace stress. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 68. 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2017-0061.
  15. Gálvez Suarez, E., & Milla Toro, R. (2018). Teaching performance evaluation model: Preparation for student learning within the framework for teacher good performance. Journal of Educational Psychology-Propositos y Representaciones, 6(2), 431-452.
  16. Gezer, T., Wang, C., Polly, A., Martin, C., Pugalee, D. ., & Lambert, R. (2021). The Relationship between Formative Assessment and Summative Assessment in Primary Grade Mathematics Classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(5), 673–685. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1508
  17. Hung, Y. J. (2018). Group peer assessment of oral english performance in a Taiwanese Elementary School. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.001
  18. Hussain, S., Shaheen, N., Ahmad, N., & Islam, S. U. (2019). Teachers’ classroom assessment practices: Challenges and opportunities to classroom teachers in Pakistan. Dialogue, 14(1), 88-97.
  19. Ishaq, K., Rana, A., & Zin, N. (2020). Exploring summative assessment  and effects: Primary to higher education. Bulletin of Education and Research, v42, 23-50.
  20. Kamalludeen, R. (2020). Transitioning to the new normal in education. www.thestar.com.my
  21. Kouhsari, M., Chen, J., & Amirian, S. K. (2023). The effect of principal emotional intelligence on teacher performance: mediating roles of organizational Trust and professional learning Community. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 22(4), 1099-1113.
  22. Lan, C. & Fa, S. (2019). Developing classroom-based language assessment literacy for in-service EFL teachers: The gaps. Studies in Educational Evolution. 112- 122
  23. Main, P. (2023, January 26). Pedagogical content knowledge. https://www.structural-learning.com/post/pedagogical-content
  24. Mcleod, S. (2024). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and scaffolding theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/zone-of-proximal-development.html
  25. Methlagl, M. (2022). Patterns of teacher collaboration, professional development and teaching practices: A multiple correspondence analysis of TALIS 2018. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100137.
  26. Moges, B. (2018). The Implementations and Challenges of Assessment Practices for Students' Learning in Public Selected Universities, Ethiopia. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 6. 2789-2806. 10.13189/ujer.2018.061213.
  27. Mouraz, A., Leite, C., & Fernandes, P. (2019). Between external influence and autonomy of schools: effects of external evaluation of schools. Paidéia, 29, e2922. doi: 10.1590/1982-4327e2922
  28. National Task Force on Assessment Education for Teachers. (2016). Assessment literacy defined
  29. Paul, V. (2020). The school principal’s role in teacher professional development. Journal of in Service Education, 26(2), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580000200114
  30. Rahman, M. M. (2018). Exploring teachers practices of classroom assessment in secondary science classes in Bangladesh. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 274-283. https://www.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n4p274
  31. Rogers, A. P., Mitescu Reagan, E., & Ward, C. (2022). Preservice teacher performance assessment and novice teacher assessment literacy. Teaching Education, 33, 175–193. doi: 10.1080/10476210.2020.1840544.
  32. Ruhl, C. (2024). Blom’s taxonomy of learning. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/blooms-taxonomy.html
  33. Saeed, M., Tahir, H., & Latif, I. (2018). Teachers' perceptions about the use of classroom assessment techniques in elementary and secondary schools. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(1), 115-130.
  34. San Juan, R. (2019). DepEd welcome PISA results, recognizes ‘gaps’ in education quality. Philstar. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2019/12/04/1974229/deped-welcomes-pisa-results-recognizes-gaps-education-quality
  35. Sarabia, A & Collantes, L. (2020). Work-related stress and teaching performance of teachers in selected school in the Philippines. Indonesian Research Journal in Education (IRJE), 10.
  36. Sumanga, C., Batuigas, F., Leyson, F., Fernandez, L., & Napil, J. (2022). Factors affecting teaching performance of junior high school teachers of Madridejos National High School. Asia Research Network Journal of Education, 2(1), 40–4. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arnje/article/view/257352.
  37. Shepard, L. A., Diaz-Bilello, E. K., Penuel, W. R., & Marion, S. F. (2020). Classroom assessment principles to support teaching and learning. Centre for Assessment, Design, Research and Evaluation, University of Colorado Boulder. https://www.colorado.edu/cadre/classroom-assessment-principles-support-teaching-and-learning
  38. Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., & Chi, L. J. (2018). CEFR-aligned school-based assessment in the Malaysian primary ESL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 452–463. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13311
  39. TALIS. (2018) U.S. Highlights Web Report (NCES 2019-132 and NCES 2020-069). U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics
  40. Torres, A. C., & Weiner, J. (2018). The new professionalism? Charter teachers’ experiences and qualities of the teaching profession. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, 19. doi: 10.14507/epaa.26.3049
  41. Ugwu, E. & Ezeokoli, F. (2022). Assessment literacy and practices of literature-in-english teachers in Nigeria. African Journal of Teacher Education, 11, 29–52. doi: 10.21083/ajote.v11i2.6889.
  42. Widiastuti, I. A. M. S. (2018). Teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 42, p. 00052). EDP Sciences.