Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 26 no. 7 (2024)

Reading Proficiency in the Digital Era: Teachers’ Challenges

Evangeline Galito | Carlito  Abarquez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This research sought to uncover the interconnected dynamics, barriers, and opportunities that existed within this context to inform strategies that would support teachers in their pivotal role in shaping the future of society. The elementary school teachers of the Naawan District participated in this survey as respondents. The survey questionnaire employed in this study underwent a comprehensive validation process. Notably, the largest age group falls within the range of 36 to 45 years. The overwhelming majority of teachers were females and a substantial portion was married. The dominance of Teacher I positions underscored the prevalence of entry-level roles, with the majority having earned Masteral Units. The survey findings shed light on the challenges teachers faced in adopting digital tools and integrating them into reading practices. These findings underscored the nuanced influence of socio-demographic factors on teachers' challenges in digital integration, suggesting the need for tailored support programs. The significant correlation underscored the impact of external factors, such as technological challenges, on teachers' ability to deliver effective instruction. The multiple regression analysis found that socio-economic factors did not significantly predict teachers' classroom teaching performance. However, facing challenges in adopting digital tools and integrating them into reading practices significantly impacted teaching performance. The action plan aimed to address the study's findings on the significant impact of challenges in digital integration on teaching performance.



References:

  1. Anderson, R. C. (2019). Implications of the national reading panel’s meta-analysis for comprehension instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 331-335.
  2. Balyer, V., & Oz, V. (2018). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  3. Biancarosa, G. (2019). Technology tools to support reading in the digital age. The Future of Children, 22(2), 139-160.
  4. Blasco, J., Respory, T., & Seanot, G. (2021). Fundamentals: Read, recall. http://success.oregonstate.edu/sites/success.oregonstate.edu/files/LearningCorner/Tools/preview_read_recall.pdf.
  5. Brooks, F., & McCormack, L. (2020). The efficacy of repeated reading and wide reading practice for high school students with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities, Research & Practice, 25, 2-10.
  6. Chachia, C., Gretal, J., & Tareric, K. (2021). Reading comprehension in the digital age: Multimodal interaction. Interactive Learning Environments, 36(8), 2353-2567.
  7. Chang, C. (2018). Enhancing reading comprehension in the digital age: Multimodal interaction and hypermedia annotations. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(8), 1053-1067.
  8. Chen, L. (2021). Handbook of reading research: Volume III. http://www.readingonline.org/articles/handbook/pressley/index.html.
  9. Costa, J., Mores, J., & Trong, L. (2021). Reconsidering the evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative methods of reading instruction. SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/article/10.10648-019.
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  11. Daniel, D. (2020). The importance of reading comprehension. https://www.aces.edu/blog/topics/home-family-urban/the-importance-of-.
  12. Delcker, M. T., & Ifenthaler, A. G. (2021). How well suited are electronic books to supporting literacy? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(2), 147-164.
  13. Delgado, K., Bradley, S., & Teworal, O. (2019). Strategy instruction in reading comprehension: An intervention study for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5(1), 41-57.
  14. Di Pietro, C. L., Ranoa, S., Reynolds, D., & Nodes, K. (2020). Reading literacy coaching: Partnering with parents for reading success. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Family-Literacy-Coaching.
  15. Fernandez-Gutierrez, C. L., Robin, S., Rachel, D., & Knode, K. (2020). Family literacy coaching: Partnering with parents for reading success. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Family-Literacy-Coaching.
  16. Gaol, L., & Prasolova-Forland, C. (2021). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5-21.
  17. Han, P. (2021). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435.
  18. Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen‐Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2019). Trust in digital information. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(4), 367-374.
  19. Hellin, L. (2023). The relationship between reading comprehension and parent support (Doctoral dissertation). https://proquest.com (Dissertation No. 3478429).
  20. Johnson, B. (2020). Do textbooks matter for reading comprehension? A study in Flemish primary education. Frontiers. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3/fpsyg.2019.02959/full.
  21. Kabaran, S. (2021). Teaching digital civic literacy: An evaluation of the Stanford History Education Group's curriculum. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(1-2), 13-28.
  22. Keriwin, C. (2022). Impact of online discussion strategies on students' reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 593-616.
  23. Kim, C. (2019). The effects of computer-mediated learning and peer feedback on EFL writing motivation, writing apprehension, and writing performance. The Language Learning Journal, 47(3), 253-268.
  24. Konig, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2020). Teachers' everyday professional development: Mapping of digital informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111-1150.
  25. Lawrence, L. C., & Tar, J. (2018). Let's read them a story! The parent–child ritual of reading aloud. Language Arts, 83(2), 140-148.
  26. Livingstone, D. J. (2018). The new literacies of online reading comprehension: Expanding the literacy and learning curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(2), 97-112.
  27. Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2019). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61-68.
  28. Osorio-Saez, S. (2021). Reading instruction in primary level. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
  29. Peterson, J. (2021). Responding to the digital challenges in teacher professional development for ICT integration in education. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 110-120.
  30. Rideout, V. (2019). The common sense census: Media use by tweens and teens, 2019. Common Sense Media.
  31. Rizwan, F. (2018). The cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with low working memory. Child Development, 80, 606-621.
  32. Rott, D., & Marouane, S. S. (2018). The effects of digital tools on reading instruction and reading achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Researcher, 39(6), 404-421.
  33. Zecheria, M. (2020). Learning in the cloud: How (and why) to transform schools with digital media. Teachers College Press.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic