Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 26 no. 10 (2024)

Effect of Flexible Learning Modalities on the Mathematical Skills of Grade 10 Students

Aldyn Palma | Reynaldo Dalayap Jr.

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The flexible learning modality empowers both learners and teachers to adjust to a variety of learning styles, preferences, and circumstances. This approach acknowledges the diverse needs of students, offering a range of alternatives beyond the traditional, one-size-fits-all educational model. In this study, a flexible learning material was designed as a strategic innovation to enhance the mathematical skills of Grade 10 students at Esperanza National High School for the school year 2022-2023. The primary tool used was adapted from the Grade 10 Mathematics Self-Learning Modules provided by the Department of Education, focusing on the Quarter 1 lessons. These materials were designed to target key skills, including comprehension, computation, vocabulary, and the recognition of mathematical symbols. The research employed a quantitative methodology, specifically a quasi-experimental design. The findings revealed that students in the experimental group, who were exposed to the blended learning modality using the flexible learning materials created by the researcher, showed significant growth in their problem-solving abilities and overall mathematical competence. In contrast, students in the control group, who continued with conventional learning methods, demonstrated little to no improvement. The results highlight that learner engaged in the blended learning modality outperformed their peers, scoring considerably higher than those taught through traditional methods. Overall, the flexible learning modality proved to have a highly positive impact on students’ mathematical skills, promoting adaptability and resilience in problem-solving.



References:

  1. Abbacan-Tuguic, L. (2021). Challenges of the new normal: Students' attitude, readiness and adaptability to blended learning modality. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 6(2), 443-449.
  2. Abbasi, S., Ayoob, T., Malik, A., & Memon, S. I. (2020). Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during Covid-19 at a private medical college. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S57.
  3. Aguila Gomez, Maricel. (2014). Lecture vs. self-regulated learning: a comparison of two methods in teaching biological science. International Journal of Education. 9. 10.7718/iamure.ije.v9i1.756.
  4. Ahmad, T., & Chang, L. H. (2017). Presentation of mathematics object in verbal and symbolic forms to increase conceptual understanding in category statistics math. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 253-258.
  5. Akbasli, S., Sahin, M., & Yaykiran, Z. (2016). The effect of reading comprehension on the performance in science and mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 108-121.
  6. Anjum, S. (2015). Gender difference in mathematics achievement and its relation with reading comprehension of children at upper primary stage. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(16), 71-75.
  7. Ariyanti, G. & Santoso, F. (2021). The effects of online mathematics learning in the covid-19 pandemic period: A case study of senior high school students at Madiun City, Indonesia. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 12(3), 4-11.
  8. Azizifar, A., Roshani, S., Gowhary, H., & Jamalinesari, A. (2015). The effect of pre-reading activities on the reading comprehension performance of ilami high school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 188-194.
  9. Balala, E. L. (2016). Non-digital gamed-based learning in grade 8 students’ achievement and anxiety in mathematics. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Sultan Kudarat State University, Philippines].
  10. Bardini, C. & Pierce, R. (2015). Assumed mathematics knowledge: the challenge of symbols. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 23. 1-9.
  11. Belano, F. A. (2019). Game-based assessment and students’ academic achievement in mathematics 9. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Sultan Kudarat State University, Philippines].
  12. Bishara, S. (2018). Active and traditional teaching, self-image, and motivation in learning math among pupils with learning disabilities. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1436123.
  13. Ceylan, V. K., & Kesici, A. E. (2017). Effect of blended learning to academic achievement. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 308-320.
  14. Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
  15. Cortez, C. P. (2020). Blended, distance, electronic and virtual-learning for the new normal of mathematics education: A senior high school student’s perception. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 1(1), e02001.
  16. Dadivas, H. C. C., & Dalayap, R. H. (2016). Learning enhancement material (lem) and achievement of multigrade pupils in basic mathematics. Sultan Kudarat State University, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City, Philippines.
  17. Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129-136.
  18. Department of Education (2019, December 4). Statement on the Philippines’ ranking in the 2018 PISA results. GOV.PH. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2019/12/04/statementon-the-philippines-ranking-in-the-2018-pisaresults/
  19. Derrick, B., & White, P. (2022). Review of the partially overlapping samples framework: Paired observations and independent observations in two samples. Quant Methods Psychol, 18, 55-65.
  20. De Smedt, B., Noël, M. P., Gilmore, C., & Ansari, D. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 48-55.
  21. Dizon, Jennifer & Lumapenet, Husna. (2023). Metacognitive Instruction: An Intervention In Enhancing Pupils' Mathematical Skills. 9. 4008-4012.
  22. Espinosa, A., Monterola, S., &Punzalan, A. (2013). Career-oriented performance tasks: effects on students’ interest in chemistry. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 14(2). https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/v14_issue2/espinosa/ page2.htm
  23. Ferreira, J., Behrens, M., Torres, P., & Marriott, R. (2018). The necessary knowledge for online education: teaching and learning to produce knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2097-2106.
  24. Florence, M. and Anthony, B. (2019). Online learning. in digital media for learning. Springer International Publishing. 111-127.
  25. Gellamucho, G. T. (2019). Mastery learning approaches and achievement in geometry of grade 7 students. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Sultan Kudarat State University, Philippines].
  26. Graham et al. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90-100.
  27. Gutierrez, A. F. (2014). Development and effectiveness of an educational card game as supplementary material in understanding selected topics in biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 76-82.
  28. Harsela, K & Asih, E & Dasari, Dadan. (2021). Level of mastery of mathematical skills and mathematical resilience. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1806. 012078. 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012078.
  29. Huang, R., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Yang, J., & Wang, H. (2020). Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: The Chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted learning in COVID-19 outbreak. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University, 46.
  30. Hung, H.-T. (2017). Clickers in the flipped classroom: bring your own device (byod) to promote student learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 983–995.
  31. Imswatama, A., & Lukman, H. S. (2018). The effectiveness of mathematics teaching material based on ethnomathematics. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 35-38.
  32. Jullar, G. A. & Magbanua, M. L. G. (2016) Differentiated instruction in students’ mathematical ability. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Sultan Kudarat State University, Philippines].
  33. Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1278.
  34. Kukreja, V., Sakshi (2022). Machine learning models for mathematical symbol recognition: A stem to stern literature analysis. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 28651–28687.
  35. Lantajo, Justina & Tipolo, Roderick. (2019). Student-Team Achievement Division (STAD) and its effect on the academic performance of grade 8 students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1254. 012014. 10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012014.
  36. Laremenko, N. (2017). Enhancing English language learners’ motivation through online games. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 59, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v59i3.1606
  37. Lim, S.Y., & Chapman, E. (2013). Development of a short form of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82 145-164.
  38. Lin, X. (2022). Effectiveness and responsiveness of a fraction vocabulary intervention for students experiencing mathematics difficulty in grade 4 (Doctoral dissertation).
  39. MacFarland, T. W., Yates, J. M., MacFarland, T. W., & Yates, J. M. (2021). Student’s t-Test for independent samples. Using R for Biostatistics, 141-240.
  40. Malantok, N. T., & Dardo, A. S. (2016). Estratehiya at pagkatuto sa panitikang asyano ng mga mag-aaral sa kolehiyo. Sultan Kudarat State University, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City, Philippines.
  41. Manfei, X. U., Fralick, D., Zheng, J. Z., Wang, B., & Changyong, F. E. N. G. (2017). The differences and similarities between two-sample t-test and paired t-test. Shanghai archives of psychiatry, 29(3), 184.
  42. Mattoon, C., Bates, A., Shifflet, R., Latham, N., & Ennis, S. (2015). Examining computational skills in prekindergarteners: the effects of traditional and digital manipulatives in a prekindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 17(1), n1.
  43. Mekler, E., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A., &Opwis, K. (2017). Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525–534.
  44. Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394.
  45. Ortiz, M., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2016). Gamification in higher education and stem: a systematic review of literature. EDULEARN16 Proceedings, pp 6548-6558.
  46. Owusu-Darko, I., Apoenchir, H. K., & Mensah, J. Y. (2022). Mathematical Constructs–What are These, and Their Interconnection with Ethnomathematical Concepts. Indonesian Journal of Ethnomathematics, 1(2), 89-104.
  47. Paculanan, A.M., (2013). Reciprocal peer tutoring (rpt), its effect on the attitude and mathematics achievement of engineering and science education program (ESEP). Sultan Kudarat State University, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City.
  48. Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. face-to-face environmental science course from 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1, 7.
  49. Peñaredondo, A. (2015). Cooperative learning approach in teaching english and students’ composition writing performance. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Sultan Kudarat State University, Philippines].
  50. Powell, S. R., Driver, M. K., Roberts, G., & Fall, A. M. (2017). An analysis of the mathematics vocabulary knowledge of third-and fifth-grade students: Connections to general vocabulary and mathematics computation. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 22-32.
  51. Powell, S. R., Bos, S. E., & Lin, X. (2021). The assessment of mathematics vocabulary in the elementary and middle school grades. Diversity dimensions in mathematics and language learning, 313-330.
  52. Puedan, M.J. G. (2018). Brain-based learning on mathematical achievement of the students. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Sultan Kudarat State University, Philippines].
  53. Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Maldonado-Macías, A. A., Arredondo-Soto, K. C., Baez-Lopez, Y., Carrillo-Gutiérrez, T., & Hernández-Escobedo, G. (2020). The impact of environmental factors on academic performance of university students taking online classes during the covid-19 pandemic in Mexico. Sustainability, 12(21), 9194.
  54. Rombot, O., Boeriswati, E., & Suparman, M. A. (2020). Improving reading comprehension skills of international elementary school students through blended learning. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(1), 56-68.
  55. Santos, J. B., & Atayan, W. M. (2016). Aerobics in teaching folk dance. Sultan Kudarat State University, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City.
  56. Setti, R. (2020) Exploring peer tutoring as an alternative learning strategy to teacher-centered approach in higher education: the case of second-year master students of English at Mohamed Kheider University of Biskra.
  57. Sousa Lima, M. A., Monteiro, A. C., Melo Leite, A. J. Jr., de Andrade Matos, I. S., Alexandre, F. S. O., Nobre, D. J., et al. (2019). Game-based application for helping students review chemical nomenclature in a fun way. J. Chem. Educ. 96, 801–805. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00540
  58. Stańdo, Jacek & Kołodziejski, Kamil & Fechner, Żywilla. (2023). Assessment of students’ mathematical skills in relation to their strengths and weaknesses, at different levels of the European Qualifications Framework. Sustainability. 15. 8661. 10.3390/su15118661.
  59. Syauqi, K., Munadi, S., and Triyono, M. (2020). Students’ perceptions toward vocational education on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4), 881-886, 2020. DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20766
  60. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48, 1273-1296.
  61. Tadalan, C. (2021, February 1). Coronavirus pandemic highlights failures of Philippine education. BusinessWorld. https://www.bworldonline.com/coronaviruspandemic-highlights-failures-of-philippineeducation/
  62. Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R., & Mumu, J. (2021). The mathematics instruction in a rural area during the pandemic era: Problems and solutions. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(1), 3-15.
  63. Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M. (2013). Blended Learning or E-learning?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.4085.
  64. Tomkins, S., Ramesh, A., & Getoor, L. (2016). Predicting post-test performance from online student behavior: a high school MOOC Case Study. International Educational Data Mining Society.
  65. Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641-647.
  66. Trisnawati, T., Pratiwi, R., & Waziana, W. (2018). The effect of realistic mathematics education on student's mathematical communication ability. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 31-35.
  67. Tusoy, E. R., & Tan, D. A. (2022). Flexible learning approach via reflective thinking: its effect on students’mathematical comprehension and metacognitive skills. Science International (Lahore), 34(5), 417-422.
  68. Tyaningsih, R., Arjudin, Prayitno, S., Jatmiko, &Handayani, A. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mathematics learning in higher education during learning from home (LFH): Students' views for the new normal. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012119
  69. Vasbieva, D. G., Klimova, I. I., Agibalova, E. L., Karzhanova, N. V., & Bírová, J. (2016). Enhancement of students' vocabulary learning through a blended learning approach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1195-1203.
  70. Vanbinst, K., & De Smedt, B. (2016). Individual differences in children's mathematics achievement: The roles of symbolic numerical magnitude processing and domain-general cognitive functions. Progress in brain research, 227, 105-130.
  71. Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Newcombe, N. S., Filipowicz, A. T., & Chang, A. (2014). Deconstructing building blocks: Preschoolers' spatial assembly performance relates to early mathematical skills. Child development, 85(3), 1062-1076.
  72. Vetter, T. R., & Mascha, E. J. (2018). Unadjusted bivariate two-group comparisons: when simpler is better. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(1), 338-342.
  73. Volchok, E. (2020). Clear-Sighted Statistics: Module 15: Two-Sample Null Hypothesis Significance Tests.
  74. Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354-369.
  75. Wang, H. (2021). What works and what does not: A reflective practice on an online mathematics class. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(1), 16-29. https://commons.hostos.cuny.edu/mtrj/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2021/04/v13n1-What-Works-and-What-DoesNot.pdf
  76. Warman, L. A. D. (2021). The effect of Google classroom in Blended Learning on university students’ English ability. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 8(1), 12-23.
  77. Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352-360.
  78. White, H., & S. Sabarwal (2014). Quasi-experimental Design and Methods, Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation 8, UNICEF Office of Research, Florence.
  79. Wijaya, T. T. (2021). How Chinese students learn mathematics during the coronavirus pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (I.J.E.R.I.), 15. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4950
  80. Xu, D., Jaggars, S. (2016). Online versus traditional classroom instruction: An examination of developmental English courses at an Alabama community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(5), 394-400.
  81. Yan, F., Robert, M., & Li, Y. (2017). Statistical methods and common problems in medical or biomedical science research. International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, 9(5), 157.
  82. Yildirim, I. & Sen, S. (2019). The effects of gamification on students’ academic achievement: a meta-analysis study. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18. 10.1080/10494820.2019.1636089.
  83. Yusrina D. (2017). The effectiveness of mathematics teaching material based on ethnomathematics. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 35-38.
  84. Zakaria, E., Chin, L. C., & Daud, M. Y. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics. Journal of social sciences, 6(2), 272-275.
  85. Zukhrufurrohmah and Octavina Rizky Utami Putri (2020). Learning activities using worksheet characterized by the recognition of mathematical symbols. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1470 012020.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic