HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 35 no. 4 (2025)

Demographic Profile, Cultural Awareness, and Attitude of Thai Students towards Filipino English Teachers

Cris Daniel Pabonita

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study focused on the result of the Technology Enhanced Learning Approach (TELA) specifically computer interactive simulation on Grade 10 students’ performance in Stoichiometry at General Santos City SPED Integrated School for School Year 2024-2025. Descriptive Correlational Quantitative Research was employed involving 100 learners and 15 science teachers. Data were collected using a self-made and adapted survey questionnaire and analyzed using mean, standard deviation, linear regression, and Pearson-r correlation. Findings revealed that TELA positively impacted both teacher performance and student outcomes. Teachers’ classroom observation ratings were consistently outstanding, while learners demonstrated favorable behavior responses. Statistical analyses revealed significant relationships between classroom observation ratings and learners’ behavior as well as between TELA ratings and student performance. Pearson-r correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation between teacher performance and learners’ behavior. The intervention program was highly effective with excellent teacher performance rating and notable improvements in student Stoichiometry performance. Most learners achieved above-average results although some facing minor struggles. Furthermore, the study highlighted the need for enhanced critical and creative thinking strategies to maximize learner engagement and success. In conclusion, the implementation of TELA effectively enhanced teaching quality and student learning outcomes. Strengthening instructional approaches focused on critical and creative thinking can optimize student performance and classroom behavior. These implied the value of integrating technology-enhanced learning approaches in science education to foster academic achievement and learner engagement.



References:

  1. Banca, N. A., & Diamante, R. A. (2023). Prediction of student academic performance using linear regression. International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE), 10(4), 104-      110. https://www.technoarete.org/common_abstract/pdf/IJERCSE/v10/i4/Ext_39768.pdf
  2. Cooper, J. J., & Ozansoy, K. (2022). The impacts of strategies in teaching on students’ performance in school. Near East University Online Journal of Education, 5(2),12-18.     https://dergi.neu.edu.tr/index.php/neuje/article/view/631
  3. Decano, R. B. (2023). Utilization of classroom observation tool for teachers. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 5(4), 160-174. UIJRT      https://uijrt.com/paper/utilization-classroom-observation-tool-teachers
  4. Diez, J., Garde, J. R., & Lanticse, G. M. (2022). Using web-based interactive exercises to increase the academic achievement of first-year BSED-science students in Stoichiometry. Available at SSRN 4092890.     https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4092890
  5. Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_79
  6. Gabunilas, L. M., Santos, K. J. M., Buar, C. L., Castillo, J.M. L., & Pili, U. B. (2022). Improvising an apparatus for teaching sound waves using smartphones, Physics Education, 58(1), 015014. https://doi. org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac9efb
  7. Garcia, J., Uluan, A. Y., Barat, I. J., Lubay, J. N., Macagba, I., &Mahinay, H. (2022). Lived experiences of science major students in the absence of laboratory activities. American Journal of Education and Technology, 1(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.513
  8. Hadji Abas, H. T., & Marasigan, A. P. (2020). Readiness of science laboratory facilities of the public junior high school in Lanao Del Sur, Philippines. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3606078
  9. Kriek, J., & Coetzee, A. (2016). Development of a Technology Integrated Intervention in Tertiary Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 712-724. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=974297
  10. Marzano, R. J., & Toth, M. D. (2013). Teacher evaluation that makes a difference: A new model for teacher growth and student achievement. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/books/teacher-evaluation-that-makes-a-difference?variant=113002E4&utm  
  11. Mohafa, L. G., Qhobela, M., & George, M. J. (2022). Evaluating the influence of interactive simulations on learners' academic performance in stoichiometry. South African Journal of Chemistry, 76, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2022/v76a01
  12. Noroña, R. V. (2021). A comparative analysis on the status of laboratory resources and science process skills of grade 11 learners in the schools division of Eastern Samar, Philippines. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 4(3), 137-147. https://www.gnosijournal. com/index.php/gnosi/article/view/135
  13. Parkavi, R., & Karthikeyan, P. (2024). Enhancing student performance prediction in higher education: a data-driven approach. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(Special Issue 2). https://journaleet.in/articles/enhancing-student-performance-prediction-in-higher-education-a-data-driven-approach
  14. Valdez, A. (2023). Misconceptions in Ecology of the Junior High School Grade Levels. Unpublished Dissertation NDDU, Philippines