HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 33 no. 6 (2025)

Transition Words in the Research Output of the Senior High School Students

Mark Anthony Rodriguez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explores the usage of transitional markers in the 25-research outputs of the senior high school from North Central Mindanao College in Maranding, Lala, Lanao del Norte. The study aimed to explore the inaccurately and accurately used transitional markers. The study employed qualitative research design, and conducted content analysis on the research output of the students to determine the accuracies and inaccuracies on the usage of the transitional markers. Findings revealed that students generally excel in using basic transitional markers. Conclusive terms such as "Lastly" and "Therefore" are used effectively to summarize discussions, while "Because" is aptly employed to indicate reasons. Markers for adding information, like "Additionally" and "Also," and those for contrasting ideas, such as "However" and "But," are used correctly, enhancing the clarity and richness of the text. However, more complex markers, including "Thus" and "Consequently," show varied accuracy, with "Thus" often misapplied. Inaccuracies were most prevalent, with markers like "Thus" and "Therefore" used incorrectly in conclusions and "Meanwhile" in contrasting ideas. Elaborative markers "Also" and "In addition" were frequently misused, and inferential markers "Hence" and "Thus" showed significant inaccuracies. These challenges suggest a need for targeted instruction to improve the correct application of these transitional tools. It was concluded that while students possess a foundational competence in using transitional markers, there is a clear requirement for further guidance on more sophisticated markers. An intervention lesson exemplar was developed to address these inaccuracies and enhance the overall quality of students' writing.



References:

  1. Alsaraireh, M. Y., & Suryani, I. (2020). Examining language use in higher education research. Science International (Lahore), 32(5), 561-566. doi: 10.1013/5316; CODEN: SINTE 8.
  2. Anwar, M., Ahad, M., Anwar, C., Asaad, H., Hasan, M., & Omanee, B. (2022). Correlation and Prediction of Students' Level of Reading Comprehension through Their Perception of the Application of Transition Words. Education Research International, 2022, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2082982
  3. Ariyanti, A. (2021). EFL Students' Use of Transition Signals in Essay Writing. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics. 6. 285. 10.21462/ijefl.v6i1.390.
  4. Assous, M. (2023). A contrastive study of the use of discourse markers by English learners and native speakers. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.46300/9109.2023.17.1
  5. Giddi, E., Kpeglo, S. B., & Fosu, J. (2022). Examining the challenges experienced by trainee teachers in the use of transitional devices to achieve cohesion in writing in St. Francis and St. Teresa's Colleges of Education, Ghana. Research Journal in Advanced Social Sciences, 3(1). https://royalliteglobal.com/rjass/article/view/735
  6. Hama, Farhad. (2021). An Investigation into the Difficulties of Using Transitional Words in Kurdish EFL Students' Writing at the University Level. UKH Journal of Social Sciences. 5. 107-117. 10.25079/ukhjss.v5n1y2021.pp107-117.
  7. Hassoon, F. K. (2019). An Investigation of EFL Under Graduate Students' Achievements in Identifying and Using Transitional Expressions.
  8. Khadafi, M. (2021). An Analysis of Linking Words on Students' Thesis of the 59th Graduation at English Education Study Program of STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat. Horizon, 1, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.22202/horizon.v1i1.4699
  9. Liang-Itsara, A. (2018). Cohesive Devices and Academic Writing Quality of Thai Undergraduate Students. Journal of
  10. Lumbangaol, R. (2022). The using of linking words to enhance students' writing ability at Universitas Potensi Utama. Journal MELT (Medium for English Language Teaching), 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.22303/melt.7.1.2022.01-13
  11. Mackiewicz, J. and Thompson, I., 2018. Talk about writing: The tutoring strategies of experienced writing center tutors. Routledge.Mahendra, M. W., & Dewi, N. P. R. P. (2017). The Use of Transition Signals in Efl AcademicWriting Context: A Corpus Study. IAIN Tulungagung Research Collections, 9(1), 87-100
  12. Poudel, A. P. (2018). Academic Writing: Coherence and Cohesion in Paragraph. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(1), 23-29.
  13. Rahmawati, I. N., Syafryadin, S., & Widiastuti, R. (2019). Teaching narrative writing using freaky fables game: An experimentation. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 12(2), 147-155.
  14. Rezeki, Y. S. (2018). Analysis of EFL students' citation practices and problems in academic writing. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 2(1), 62 72.https://doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.v2n1.p62-72ra          
  15. Yasto, A. A. (2022). Senior high school students' common errors in practical research 1 in the schools division of Laguna. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(11), 187-198. Retrieved from http://eprajournals.net/index.php/IJMR/article/view/1129
  16. Yousuf Ahmed, F. E. (2019). Errors of Unity and Coherence in Saudi Arabian EFL University Students' Written Paragraph: A Case Study of College of Science & Arts, Tanumah, King Khalid University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. European Journal of English Language Teaching, [S.l.], feb. 2019. ISSN 25017136. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejel/article/view/2281. doi:10.46827/ejel.v0i0.2281
  17. Yuvayapan, F. & Bilginer, H. (2020). Identifying the needs of postgraduate students: The firststep of academic writing courses. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2),595-611. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759260