Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 50 no. 1 (2025)

Sensory Evaluation and Consumer Acceptability of Ice Cream Fortified with Sweet Potato (Ipomea Batatas) and Turmeric (Curcuma Longa)

Maan Carin Atanoso | Ian Jarabelo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the effects of emerging teaching strategies on the academic performance, engagement, and perceptions of Grade 6 students at North Cabadbaran Central Elementary School, Cabadbaran City, Agusan del Norte, during the first quarter of the 2024–2025 academic year. Specifically, it explored four instructional approaches: collaborative learning, technology-enhanced learning, differentiated instruction, and gamification. Using a descriptive–correlational quantitative design, data were collected through student surveys that assessed engagement and perceptions of instructional methods. Results indicated a strong positive correlation (r = 0.82) between innovative teaching strategies and student engagement, with an average weighted mean of 4.68 for engagement and 3.99 for perceptions of strategy. Students expressed a clear preference for technology-enhanced learning, while collaborative learning strengthened teamwork and communication. The study recommends professional development programs for teachers, broader integration of technology, and the development of a unified instructional strategy guide. Overall, the findings confirm that modern pedagogical approaches have a significant impact on enhancing student engagement and academic outcomes.



References:

  1. Abaya, L. T., & Orlina, J. M. (2019). Teachers’ Perspectives on the Implementation of the K to 12 Curriculum in the Philippines: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 393-418. https://www.ijires.org/administrator/components/com_jresearch/files/publications/IJIRES_1638_FINAL.pdf
  2. Abuhmaid, A. (2021). Teachers’ Perspectives on Their Professional Development in the Context of the TPACK Framework in the 21st Century. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1255-1272.             https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10316-7
  3. Abulencia, A. S. (2015). Educational reforms in the Philippine education system: The K to 12 programs. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 2(4), 56-63.https://multijournals.org/index.php/excellencia-imje/article/view/118
  4. Alenezi, M. (2023). [Research study on gamification in education].file:///C:/Users/ASUS/Downloads/e2025477.pdf
  5. Anwar, K., & Husniah, N. (2021). Investigating the development of the TPACK framework inpre-service teachers through online collaborative learning.             Journal of Research on          Technology in Education, 53(3), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1877178
  6. Bächtold, M., Roca, P., & De Checchi, K. (2023). Students’ beliefs and attitudes towards cooperative learning, and their relationship to motivation and approach to learning. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2112028
  7. Barbier, V., et al. (2023). Promoting High-Achieving Students Through Differentiated Instruction in Diverse Classrooms. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(5), 18-33.
  8. Bidabadi, Nahid Shirani, et al. “Effective Teaching Methods in Higher Education: Requirements and Barriers.” PubMed Central (PMC), 1 Oct. 2016, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065908.
  9. Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2020). Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-1
  10. Calderon, A. C. (2018). A Policy Analysis of Philippine School System Reform Using Advocacy Coalition Framework [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, De La Salle University] .https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357356213_A_Policy_Analysis_of_Philippine_School_System_Reform_Using_Advocacy_Coalition_Framework
  11. CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org/  https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
  12. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 1-14. Retrieved from https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/23_3/1.pdf
  13. Ching, Y. H., & Hursh, C. (2021). Integrating TPACK and game-based learning: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 301-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120967316
  14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered Educators: How High-Performing Systems Shape Teaching Quality Around the World. John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Department of Education (DepEd). (2013). K to 12 programs. Retrieved from             http://www.deped.gov.ph
  16. Garcia, E., & Weiss, E. (2019). The teacher shortage is real, large and growing, and worse than we thought: The first report in ‘The Perfect Storm in the Teacher Labor Market’ series. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org/publication/the-teacher-shortage-is-real-large-and-growing-and-worse-than-we-thought-the-first-report-in-the-perfect-storm-in-the-teacher-labor-market-series/  
  17. García-Campos, M. D., González-Pienda, J. A., & Álvarez-Pérez, L. (2021).             Effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning to improve mathematical academic performance: A systematic review. Mathematics, 9(11), 1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9111284  
  18. García-López, C., et al. (2023). [Challenges and benefits of gamification in learning contexts]. https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z
  19. Hattie, J. (2019). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://inspirasifoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/John-Hattie-Visible-Learning_-A-synthesis-of-over-800-meta-analyses-relating-to-achievement-2008.pdf
  20. Helpful Professor. (2024). Differentiated instruction: Strategies, pros, and cons. Retrieved from https://helpfulprofessor.com
  21. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning:             Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3-4), 85-118. http://static.pseupdate.mior.ca.s3.amazonaws.com/media/links/Cooperative_learn_validated_theory.pdf  
  22. Kabakci Yurdakul, I., & Coklar, A. N. (2021). An investigation of pre-service Teachers’ perceptions of the TPACK framework for online teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 995-1010.             https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636073     
  23. Lampropoulos, G., & Sidiropoulos, A. (2024). Impact of gamification on students’ learning outcomes and academic performance: A longitudinal study comparing online, traditional, and gamified learning. Education Sciences, 14(4), 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040367
  24. Lowrey, K. A., Hollingshead, A., Howery, K., & Bishop, J. (2020). More than one way:    Stories of UDL and inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(3), 196-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920934299
  25. M.A. AM et al. (2023). Differentiated instruction and student engagement: A             meta-analysis of educational outcomes. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(5), 18-33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380392960_The_Effects_of_Differentiated_Instruction_and_Individualized_Instruction_on_Special_Education_Students
  26. Mali, P., & Lim, J. (2023). Innovative teaching methods and student engagement: Linking learning with real-world applications. Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 189-202.
  27. Miller, C., Kim, J., & Chen, Y. (2012). Digital Learning Effectiveness: A Comprehensive Analysis of Student Outcomes. Educational Research Review, 28, 123-138.
  28. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  29. OECD. (2017). Lessons from PISA for the United States, strong performers and successful reformers in education. OECD Publishing.
  30. Piogroup. (2023). 20 innovative strategies in teaching (+ examples) & tips for             implementation. Retrieved from https://piogroup.net
  31. Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: Exploring differentiation practices to address student   diversity. Journal of Research in Special          Educational Needs, 20(3),      217–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12481
  32. Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2022). Using Universal Design for Learning to design standards-based lessons. Educational Policy, 36(2), 302-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820910679 
  33. Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational     change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
  34. Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(25). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0 
  35. Smith, S. J., & Harvey, V. S. (2021). Applying Universal Design for Learning in online courses: Pedagogical and practical considerations. Journal of  Special Education Technology, 36(4), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643421998320 
  36. Torchia, R. (2022, September 16). Technology in the Classroom and the Benefits for K-12 Schools. EdTech Magazine. Available at: https://edtechmagazine.com Yu, J.,
  37. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report summary, 2023: technology in education: a tool on whose terms?. UNESCO. Available at: https://www.unesco.org
  38. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2020). Transforming education for the future: 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
  39. Villanueva, R. C. (2019). Rethinking Philippine teacher education in the 21st century:           Aligning with global trends and promoting excellence. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 223-242.
  40. Zhang, S., & Li, Y. (2022). Play hard, study hard? The influence of gamification on students’ study engagement. Frontiers in Education

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic