Efficacy of Game-Based Versus Traditional Teaching Approaches on Literacy and Numeracy Outcomes
Roozie Quea Elkanah Insong Idlana
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
Education continually evolves to meet the diverse learning needs of children, particularly those outside formal
schooling. Traditional, teacher-centered instruction often limits engagement and active participation, prompting the
need for innovative strategies that foster meaningful learning. This study examines the efficacy of the Game-Based
Teaching Approach (GBTA) compared with the Traditional Teaching Approach (TTA) in enhancing literacy and
numeracy skills among out-of-school children aged 8–12 in Barangay Abanico, Puerto Princesa City. Using a quasiexperimental design, the study involved two groups: the experimental group received literacy and numeracy lessons
through GBTA, while the control group received TTA instruction. Data were gathered through pre- and post-tests and
structured questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics and percentage computations. Results indicated that
learners exposed to GBTA demonstrated greater improvement in literacy and numeracy performance, along with
higher levels of motivation, engagement, and collaboration. These findings suggest that GBTA provides a more
interactive and effective learning environment than traditional methods, highlighting its potential as a dynamic
instructional strategy to address learning gaps, promote active participation, and cultivate positive attitudes toward
literacy and numeracy development among out-of-school youth.
References:
- Aflatuni, N. (2022). Primary school games and songs. Sorena Publications.
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Author.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
- Barab, S., Warren, S., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2009). Conceptual play spaces. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (Vol. 3, pp. 989–1009). IGI Global.
- Chen, C. H., Wang, Y. C., & Hong, J. C. (2019). A study on the efficacy of game-based teaching for improving learning achievements and motivation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 252–263.
- Chen, Y. C., et al. (2019). Learning environments with different levels of technological engagement: A comparison of game-based, video-based, and traditional instruction on students’ learning. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1635491
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Culajara, A. (2022). Innovative ways to deliver instruction in physical education. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(1), 188–195.
- Department of Education (DepEd). (2016). K to 12 basic education curriculum guide. Department of Education, Philippines.
- Educause. (2014). 7 things you should know about games and learning. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2014/3/7-things-you-should-know-about-games-and-learning
- Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Guan, Y. (2022). The application of game teaching assistance system in college English teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.16
- Hafeez, M. (2022). Comparative study of game-based teaching and traditional classroom learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i01.12608
- Hafeez, M. (2022). Effects of game-based teaching in comparison to traditional learning to provide an effective learning environment—A comparative review. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 12(2), 89–105.
- Jagust, T., Boticki, I., & So, H. J. (2018). Examining competitive, collaborative and adaptive gamification in young learners’ math learning. Computers & Education, 125, 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.022
- Justo, R. (2022). Game-based teaching for student engagement: A paradigm shift in blended learning education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 15(2), 1–12.
- Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A.-I. (2021). Gamification in science education: A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010022
- Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.591727
- Kim, B., & Bastani, R. (2020). What is the value of game-based teaching? EdCan Network. https://www.edcan.ca/articles/game-based-learning/
- Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, and why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146–151.
- Lewis, C., Wardrip-Fruin, N., & Whitehead, J. (2012). Motivational game design patterns of’ ville games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 172–179). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2282338.2282373
- Nasreen, A. (2019). The world of a school principal: A qualitative study of secondary school principals’ selection, capability, and current practices in the Province of Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2), 161–179.
- Nicholas. (2023). 11 benefits of working in the game-based teaching environment. LMS Hero. https://lmshero.com/benefits-of-game-based-learning/
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
- Ormrod, J. E. (2020). Human learning (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based teaching in high school computer science education: Impact on educational efficacy and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based teaching. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 21–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based teaching. McGraw-Hill.
- Richter, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2015). Studying gamification: The effect of rewards and incentives on motivation. In T. Reiners & L. C. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 21–46). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_2
- Schrader, C. (2023). Serious games and motivation: A systematic literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10199-8
- Shute, V. J., & Ke, F. (2012). Games, learning, and assessment. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 433–452). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_29
- Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional efficacy of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x
- Squire, K. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Teachers College Press.
- Tan, K. W., & Hidaya, N. A. (2023). Serious games for environmental education. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369713345_Serious_games_for_environmental_education
- Tsekleves, E., Cosmas, J., & Aggoun, A. (2014). Game-based teaching for health literacy: A review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12040
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Yadav, A. K., & Ovelere, S. S. (2020). Contextualized mobile game-based teaching application for computing education. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2539–2562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-01037-3