HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 50 no. 7 (2025)

Evaluating the Relationship of Assistive Technology and Students’ Reading and Writing Skills Performance in Special Needs Education Program

Josephine Gumban | Donna Mae Tagsip

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the extent of assistive technology (AT) utilization among teachers in self-contained and inclusive classroom settings, as well as its relationship with learners’ literacy performance. Specifically, it investigated teachers’ perceptions, the frequency of AT use, and its perceived impact on student learning, alongside learners' pre-test and post-test results in reading comprehension and writing skills. A quantitative research design employing a pre-test– post-test approach was used to measure changes in learners’ performance. At the same time, a correlation analysis revealed a relationship between AT utilization and literacy outcomes. Data were gathered through teacher-respondent survey questionnaires and performance assessments for learners. Findings revealed that teachers expressed highly favorable perceptions of AT and acknowledged its potential to enhance student learning. However, despite this positive outlook, the reported frequency of AT integration remained low (rated as “Rarely”). Learners demonstrated significant improvements in both reading comprehension and writing skills from pre-test to post-test, reflecting the effectiveness of instructional strategies that incorporated AT elements. Nonetheless, the correlation analysis indicated very weak and statistically nonsignificant relationships between the extent of AT utilization and learners’ post-test performance in literacy. The study concludes that while assistive technology holds considerable perceived value in supporting inclusive education, its limited and inconsistent implementation constrains its full potential impact on literacy outcomes. Therefore, it is recommended that schools develop and implement an intervention plan focused on systematic integration, continuous professional development, and institutional support for resources to strengthen the effective use of AT in fostering literacy achievement among diverse learners.



References:

  1. Aggarwal, J. C. (2019). Essentials of educational management. Vikas Publishing House.
  2. Airasian, P. W., & Russell, M. K. (2018). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  3. Alkahtani, K. D. (2023). Teachers’ barriers to integrating assistive technology in inclusive education: Perspectives and challenges. International Journal of Special Education, 38(2), 145–160.
  4. Block, C. C., Gambrell, L. B., & Pressley, M. (2022). Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice. Jossey-Bass.
  5. Bouck, E. C. (2016). Assistive technology and academic achievement for students with disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(4), 351–363.
  6. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5–6), 489–503.
  7. Cardona, M. (2024). Assistive technology integration in inclusive classrooms: A framework for literacy improvement. University of the Philippines Press.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
  10. De Guzman, L. (2025). Enhancing literacy through visual schedules and performance-based assessments in inclusive education. Cebu Technological University Research Repository.
  11. Dell, A. G., Newton, D. A., & Petroff, J. G. (2019). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experiences of students with disabilities (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
  12. Department of Education (DepEd). (2021). DepEd Order No. 44, s. 2021: Policy guidelines on inclusive education for learners with disabilities. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.
  13. Edyburn, D. L. (2023). Rethinking assistive technology in inclusive classrooms: Implementation, impact, and equity. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 17(1), 1–21.
  14. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2021). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  15. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Adkins, M. (2015). Practices that make a difference: Effective writing instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1086/681947
  16. Judge, S., Floyd, K., & Jeffs, T. (2018). Using assistive technology to support student learning in inclusive classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218765490
  17. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
  18. Okolo, C. M., & Bouck, E. C. (2019). Research about assistive technology: 2007 to 2017. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418795848
  19. Republic Act No. 10173. (2012). Data Privacy Act of 2012. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.privacy.gov.ph/data-privacy-act/
  20. Retiro, J., Lanuza, R., & Mirasol, K. (2025). Teachers’ attitudes toward the use of assistive technology and its correlation with student learning outcomes in special and inclusive education. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 29(1), 45–58.
  21. Sharma, U., & Sokal, L. (2016). Can teachers’ self-reported efficacy, concerns, and attitudes predict their inclusive classroom practices? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(9), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n9.1
  22. Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (13th ed.). Pearson Education.
  23. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and framework for action on special needs education. UNESCO.
  24. UNESCO. (n.d.). Inclusive education policy framework. UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
  25. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). United Nations Treaty Collection. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf