Learning Motivation in Face-to-Face and Online Classes Among First-Year Bachelor of Secondary Education Filipino Students
Cherimie N. De Leon | Niña R. Butanog | Anna Marie L. Mendoza | Loraine Jane S. Padua | Jeddah B. Quiño-Justol
Discipline: Teacher Training
Abstract:
This study examined the relationship between face-to-face and online
learning modalities and students’ learning motivation. Guided by SelfDetermination Theory, it assessed the motivation of 92 first-year Bachelor of
Secondary Education major in Filipino students across four dimensions:
instructional engagement, peer connection, self-regulation, and technologyenhanced interaction, and tested whether motivation significantly differed
between the two modalities. Using a descriptive-comparative design, data were
gathered using a validated researcher-made questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.937)
and analyzed using means, standard deviations, and paired samples t-tests.
Results showed that students had very high motivation in face-to-face classes (M
= 4.38, SD = 0.51) and moderate motivation in online classes (M = 3.35, SD = 0.77).
A significant difference was found between the two modalities, favoring face-toface learning. The findings suggest that face-to-face instruction remains more
effective in supporting student motivation and highlight the need to strengthen
motivational strategies in online learning environments.
References:
- Ariffin, A. (2023). Online learning environments, learners’ empowerment, and learning behavioral engagement. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322852457
- Barrot, J., Llenares, I., & del Rosario, L. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7321–7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
- Booij, A.S., Leuven, E., & Oosterbeek, H. (2022). Peer effects, motivation, and learning process. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46490405
- Boulton, C., Hughes, E., Kent, C., Smith, J., & Williams, H. (2019). Student engagement and wellbeing over time at a higher education institution. PLOS One, 14(11), e0225770. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225770
- Briones, L. (2022). DepEd: Education must continue amid COVID-19 pandemic. Department of Education. https://tinyurl.com/4skxfaas
- Broadbent, J., & Poon, W.L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
- Chiu, T. (2024). Student engagement in K-12 online learning amid COVID-19: A self-determination perspective [Unpublished manuscript]. https://tinyurl.com/msz7dzs5
- Dalida, M.A., Cruz, J.P., & Santos, R.M. (2025). Self-determination and academic motivation among nursing students in their transition to face-to-face learning. Journal of Rural Community Nursing Practice, 3(1), 33–59. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390182159
- Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2022). Self-determination theory and online learning engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 1411–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
- Dixson, M.D., Greenwell, M.R., Rogers-Stacy, C., Weister, T., & Lauer, S. (2016). Nonverbal immediacy behaviors and online student engagement: Bringing past instructional research into the digital classroom. Communication Education, 66(1), 37–53.
- Duckworth, A.L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M.D., & Kelly, D.R. (2019). Clinical factors influencing resilience. Clinical Psychology Review, 70, 101776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101776
- Francis, M.K., Wormington, S.V., & Hulleman, C.S. (2019). Comparing online and face-to-face performance in community college mathematics courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2054. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02054
- Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
- Händel, M., Stephan, M., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kopp, B., & Bedenlier, S. (2023). Students’ motivation in an online and a face-to-face semester. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000519
- Huang, Q., Hew, K.F., & Lo, C.K. (2019). Comparing teacher’s roles of face-to-face learning and online learning in a blended English course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1540434
- Lestari, I., Hamzah, A., & Yusuf, M. (2019). Face-to-face promotive interaction leading to successful cooperative learning. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1674067. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1674067
- Mendoza, L.P., & Dela Cruz, F.G. (2022). Pagsusuri sa epekto ng modality ng pagkatuto sa motibasyon ng mga mag-aaral sa piling komunidad na kolehiyo sa Mindanao. Mindanao Journal of Educational Studies.
- Ojo, A.O., Adu, E.O., & Olatoye, R.A. (2021). Investigating students’ motivation and online learning engagement through the lens of self-determination theory. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379573006
- Oyeleke, J.T., Olaniyi, S.S., & Adeyemi, A.A. (2022). The effects of student engagement, satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. Education Sciences, 10(9), 304.
- Paris, S., & Paris, A. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
- Quiño, J. (2022). Students’ perception and satisfaction of Google Classroom as instructional medium for teaching and learning. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i2.22
- Rasheed, R.A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N.A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
- Romano, L., Tang, X., & Hwang, G.J. (2023). Exploring student perceptions and use of face-to-face classes and online resources. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00416-3
- Salmani, N., Bagheri, M., & Hedayati, M. (2023). Multimedia use and its impact on the effectiveness of educators. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 458. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02458-4
- Salmela-Aro, K., Upadyaya, K., & Hietajärvi, L. (2023). Disrupted student engagement and motivation in online and face-to-face learning environments. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1320822. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1320822
- Schunk, D.H., & Greene, J.A. (2021). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/bdd3f38e
- Stark, A.M. (2023). The role of motivation in learning strategies and academic performance in online and face-to-face education. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335585931
- Swan, K., & Shih, L.F. (2021). A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. In J. Bourne & J.C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities (pp. xx–xx). Sloan-C. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED444586.pdf
- Teen Vogue. (2021). Why online learning during COVID-19 has been so difficult. https://tinyurl.com/yvmxc9m9
- Walker, A., Smith, J., & Johnson, P. (2024). Exploring the relationship between motivation and academic performance among online and blended learners. Oregon State University. https://tinyurl.com/2zuefv9v
- Wang, C., Hsu, H.C., & Bonem, E.M. (2019). Need satisfaction and need dissatisfaction in online and face-to-face learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.005
- WIRED. (2021). The messy transition to remote learning—and what we can learn from it. https://tinyurl.com/3ue7pph2
- Zhang, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, Y. (2024). How peer relationships affect academic achievement among junior high school students. BMC Psychology, 12, Article 178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01780-z
- Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Full Text:
Note: Kindly Login or Register to gain access to this article.
ISSN 2984-8385 (Online)
ISSN 2984-8288 (Print)