Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 5 (2026)

A Self-Learning Module for Grade 7 Students: A Sustainable Enhancement Material for the Least Mastered Competencies in Basic Mathematical Concepts

Mary Grade A. Aledo | Kyla Mae T. Mayo | Emilio James M. Yao | Leroy A. Flores

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Mathematics is considered one of the most important subjects in the Philippine educational curriculum. However, the majority of students, especially those in junior high school, still struggle with its basic con- cepts. To address this problem, the researchers developed a self-learn- ing module (SLM) to enhance Grade 7 students' least mastered compe- tencies in basic mathematical concepts, using the ADDIE (Analyze, De- sign, Develop, Implement, Evaluate) model and a descriptive-develop- mental research approach. The least mastered competencies of stu- dents were analyzed during the needs assessment of researcher-exten- sionists at a state university in Zambales. The researchers designed and implemented the SLM to help students study independently and under- stand mathematics better, with features such as various types of activi- ties, practical examples, self-assessment tasks, and bilingual (English and Filipino) explanations, serving as an innovative means of indirect interaction. Results indicated that the SLM effectively addressed learn- ing gaps, as evidenced by improved student performance and favorable evaluation ratings of the module's design and instructional features. This study implied that the SLM is expected to contribute to the devel- opment of effective and accessible learning materials that can sustaina- bly enhance the mathematical proficiency of Grade 7 students, particu- larly in contexts where language and resource limitations persist.



References:

  1. Abbas, S. G., Ayaz, N., Mahjabeen, A., & Khan, A. (2025). The impact of mathematics educa-tion on middle school students’ learning trajectories. Research Consortium Archive, 3(1)
  2. .Acharya, B. R. (2017). Factors affecting difficul-ties in learning mathematics by mathe-matics learners. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20170602.11">https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20170602.11">https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20170602.11
  3. Aisah, T. N., Muiz, D. A., & W Muharam, M. R. (2024). Analysis of difficulty in solving story problems based on Newman’s error analysis on flat building material in Grade IV elementary school. Scientica Education Journal, 1(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.62872/aw876f77">https://doi.org/10.62872/aw876f77">https://doi.org/10.62872/aw876f77
  4. Benito, S. M., Johhny S. Bantulo, & Haudar, F. S. (2022). Effectiveness of self learning mod-ules (SLM) in teaching mathematics 3. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZE-NODO.6497186">https://doi.org/10.5281/ZE-NODO.6497186">https://doi.org/10.5281/ZE-NODO.6497186
  5. Bouchrika, I. (2024). The ADDIE Model Ex-plained: Evolution, Steps, and Applications for 2024. https://research.com/educa-tion/the-addie-model">https://research.com/educa-tion/the-addie-model">https://research.com/educa-tion/the-addie-model
  6. Buan, A. T., Lucero, L. G., & Consolacion, R. A. (2024). Sustaining engagement in a blended learning modality. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13543.83360">https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13543.83360">https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13543.83360
  7. Carnine, D. (2017). Direct instruction reading(Sixth edition). Pearson.
  8. Castroverde, F., & Acala, M. (2021). Modular distance learning modality: Challenges of teachers in teaching amid the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Re-search Studies in Education, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2021.602">https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2021.602">https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2021.602
  9. Culpable, C. B., Labrador, M. F., Rullan, A., & De-los Santos, M. S. (2024). Project tabang: A remediation in mathematics for learners at risk of failing. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZE-NODO.14562520">https://doi.org/10.5281/ZE-NODO.14562520">https://doi.org/10.5281/ZE-NODO.14562520
  10. Francisco, J. G., Alova, C. A. R., Alova, I. M. C., & Apohen, S. L. (2022). Performance of Grade 8 Students in Mathematics Inter-vention Program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Ed-ucation Research, 3(9), 1742–1748. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.03.09.14">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.03.09.14">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.03.09.14
  11. Gafoor, K. A., & Kurukkan, A. (2015). Why High School Students Feel Mathematics Diffi-cult? An Exploration of Affective Beliefs. Pedagogy of Teacher Education: Trends and Challenges. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18880.12800">https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18880.12800">https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18880.12800
  12. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement(0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
  13. Jailani, N., Rosli, R., & Mahmud, M. S. (2025). Factors influencing mathematics teach-ers’ blended learning: A systematic re-view. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(1), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.1.20">https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.1.20">https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.1.20
  14. Linga, J. (2024). Factors affecting students’ mathematics academic performance in the IB MYP programme: Basis for the formula-tion of an action plan. The Korean Confer-ence on Education 2024 Official Confer-ence Proceedings. https://lnk.ink/IsF4O">https://lnk.ink/IsF4O">https://lnk.ink/IsF4O
  15. Lutching, C. D. (2024). Self-learning modules (SLM): Its effect on the academic perfor-mance in mathematics in the new normal. International Journal of Educational Re-search and Development. https://ti-nyurl.com/4td4mrej">https://ti-nyurl.com/4td4mrej">https://ti-nyurl.com/4td4mrej
  16. Mallillin, L. L. D., Canda, E. G., & Caday, Ma. A. T. (2024). Self-learning module assessment and feedback in mathematics. European Journal of Education Studies, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i9.5534">https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i9.5534">https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i9.5534
  17. Mandagdag, J., Golez, R., & Closa, B. G. (2024). The Impact of Remedial Classes on the Performance of Grade 7 Learners in Math-ematics Using the Project TAPPPIK. Edu-cational Challenges, 29(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2024.29.1.07">https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2024.29.1.07">https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2024.29.1.07
  18. Martin, S. N., Suryadi, D., & Juandi, D. (2019). Students’ difficulties in solving the mathe-matics word problems with the context of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). Journal of Physics: Conference Se-ries, 1157, 042051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042051">https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042051">https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042051
  19. Natividad, E. (2021). Perceived Effectiveness of Self Learning Modules in the Implementa-tion of Modular Distance Learning in the Elementary Level. SSRN Electronic Jour-nal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3889429">https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3889429">https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3889429
  20. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en">https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en">https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
  21. Perez, A. L., & Alieto, E. (2018). Change of “tongue” from english to a local language: A correlation of mother tongue profi-ciency and mathematics achievement. The Asian ESP Journal. https://ti-nyurl.com/yc57kw7z">https://ti-nyurl.com/yc57kw7z">https://ti-nyurl.com/yc57kw7z
  22. Radha, T., Vasuki, M., & Kumar, A. (2015). BRIDGING THEORY AND PRACTICE: EX-PLORING EFFECTIVE APPROACHES IN MATH EDUCATION. Journal of Engineer-ing, Scientific Research and Applications, 1(2).
  23. Rapada, S., & Servañez, B. (2024). Development and Validation of Onhan Supplementary Learning Module on Four Basic Opera-tions on Integers. Romblon State Univer-sity Research Journal, 6(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v6i1.170">https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v6i1.170">https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v6i1.170
  24. Reid, N. (2009). Working memory and science education: Conclusions and implications. Research in Science & Technological Edu-cation, 27(2), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140902853681">https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140902853681">https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140902853681
  25. Rico, J. A., & Mendoza, L. (2022). A Tool to As-sess the Quality of Self-learning Modules (SLMS) for the ‘New Normal’ in Education Using the Best-worst Method. ACE Official Conference Proceedings, 237–255. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2022.19">https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2022.19">https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2022.19
  26. Rogayan Jr., D. V., & Dollete, L. F. (2019). Devel-opment and Validation of Physical Science Workbook for Senior High School. Science Education International, 30(4), 84–290. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i4.5">https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i4.5">https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i4.5
  27. Roman, A. G. (2013). Development and Valida-tion of Statistics Module for Quality Educa-tional Research. 5(9).
  28. Sousa, D. A. (2017). How the brain learns(Fifth edition). Corwin, a Sage Publishing Com-pany.
  29. Uhuad, A. J. (2024). Development and Valida-tion of Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) in Grade 9 Physics. Psychology and Educa-tion: A Multidisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZE-NODO.12797350">https://doi.org/10.5281/ZE-NODO.12797350">https://doi.org/10.5281/ZE-NODO.12797350
  30. Unson, J. C. (2021). Vocabulary and Identifica-tion of Information: Difficulties and Chal-lenges in Word Problems Solving. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 9(08), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v9i08.02">https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v9i08.02">https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v9i08.02
  31. Velez, A. J., Dayaganon, D. G., Robigid, J., Demorito, J., Villegas, J., & Gomez, D. (2023). Difficulties and Coping Strategies in Understanding Mathematical Concepts in a Private Higher Education in Tagum City, Davao del Norte, Philippines. Davao Research Journal, 14(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v14i1.10">https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v14i1.10">https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v14i1.10
  32. Waswa, D. W., & Al-kassab, M. M. (2023). Math-ematics learning challenges and difficul-ties: A students’ perspective. In D. Zeidan, J. C. Cortés, A. Burqan, A. Qazza, J. Merker, & G. Gharib (Eds.), Mathematics and Com-putation(Vol. 418, pp. 311–323). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0447-1_27">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0447-1_27">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0447-1_27
  33. Ysseldyke, J., & Tardrew, S. (2007). Use of a Pro-gress Monitoring System to Enable Teach-ers to Differentiate Mathematics Instruc-tion. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1300/j370v24n01_01

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic