Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 4 (2026)

Language, Culture, and Gender: The Role of Traditional Stories in the Acceptance of Transgender Individuals

Anthony M. Mon | Elmer C. Diocares | Shellamarie I. Diocares

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

This qualitative study investigates the intersection of traditional story- telling, cultural heritage, and the societal acceptance of transgender indi- viduals within the Philippine context. While historical narratives often dictate rigid gender binaries, this research explores how such stories can simultaneously act as barriers to and instruments for gender inclusivity. Through semi-structured interviews with eight transgender participants from Sta. Cruz, Zambales, the study identifies core thematic challenges, including religious discrimination, deep-seated superstitions regarding "bad luck," and the pervasive influence of gendered role performance. The findings suggest that while traditional narratives currently reinforce stereotyping and misinformation, they possess the latent power to re- shape social values. By promoting inclusive storytelling and leveraging family support systems, society can transition from exclusionary tradi- tions toward a framework of empathy, self-love, and genuine transgender integration.



References:

  1. Argyriou, P., Benamar, K., & Nikolajeva, M. (2022). What to blend? Exploring the rela-tionship between student engagement and academic achievement via a blended learning approach. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 21(2), 126-137.
  2. Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2010). Defining stu-dent engagement. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 43(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2011.533096">https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2011.533096">https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2011.533096
  3. Balwant, P. T. (2018). The meaning of student engagement and disengagement in the classroom context: Lessons from organi-sational behaviour. Journal of further and higher education, 42(3), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1281887">https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1281887">https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1281887
  4. Burch, G. F., Heller, N. A., Burch, J. J., Freed, R., & Steed, S. A. (2015). Student engagement: Developing a conceptual framework and survey instrument. Journal of Education for Business, 90(4), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821">https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821">https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821
  5. Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and gen-eral campus-based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Educa-tion, 32(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878\">https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878/">https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878\
  6. Fletcher, A. (2015). Defining student engage-ment: A literature review. Sound out: Pro-moting Meaningful Student Involvement, Student Voice and Student Engagement.https://soundout.org/2015/03/29/de-fining-student-engagement-a-literature-review/
  7. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unob-servable variables and measurement er-ror. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104">https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104">https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  8. Groccia, J. E. (2018). What is student engage-ment? New directions for teaching and learning, 2018(154), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20287">https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20287">https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20287
  9. Gudoniene, D., Staneviciene, E., Huet, I., Dickel, J., Dieng, D., Degroote, J., ... & Casanova, D. (2025). Hybrid teaching and learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 17(2), 756.
  10. Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of stu-dent engagement: Conceptual and empiri-cal foundations. New directions for institu-tional research, 141, 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283">https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283">https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
  11. Lin, L. C., Hung, I. C., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2019). The impact of student engage-ment on learning outcomes in a cyber-flipped course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1573-1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09698-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09698-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09698-9
  12. Luo, Qin, Lunchao Chen, Dongfang Yu, and Ke Zhang. "The Mediating Role of Learning Engagement Between Self-Efficacy and Academic Achievement Among Chinese College Students." Psychology Research and Behavior Management (2023): 1533-1543. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S401145">https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S401145">https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S401145
  13. Raes, A. (2022). Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environ-ments: does presence matter?. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 138-159.
  14. Slavich, G. M., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Trans-formational teaching: Theoretical under-pinnings, basic principles, and core meth-ods. Educational psychology review, 24, 569-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6
  15. Teoh, S. H., Boon Zik Hong, J., Md Shamsudin, N., Singh, P., & Hartono, R. (2025). Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a com-parison between face-to-face and virtual environments. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2451497.
  16. Vergara, R.A.G. (2022). Delivering A Transfor-mational Learning Experience Online. In-ternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(12), 2726-2737. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.03.12.24">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.03.12.24">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.03.12.24
  17. Vergara, R.A.G. (2023a). Transformative learn-ing in the online classroom: A marketing educator’s autoethnographic account. In-ternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(7), 2444-2451. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.07.24">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.07.24">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.07.24
  18. Vergara, R.A.G. (2023b). The value of experien-tial lessons in event marketing education. Philippine Academy of Management E-Journal, 6(2), 66-75.
  19. Vergara, K. C., Santos, J. E., Blasa-Cheng, A., Balatbat, M., & Vergara, R. A. (2023). En-gagement and learning success: Evidence from three years of transformational teaching strategies in online event mar-keting education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Ed-ucation Research, 4(11), 4101-4112. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.11.27">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.11.27">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.11.27
  20. Vergara, R.A.G., & Vergara, K.C.S (2023a). Learning Co-Creation and Self-Determina-tion: Lessons from Teaching Event Mar-keting. International Journal of Multidisci-plinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(7), 2566-2573. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.07.33">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.07.33">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.07.33
  21. Vergara, R.A.G., & Vergara, K.C.S. (2023b). Sto-rytelling in the Classroom: Why it Matters in Event Marketing Education. Interna-tional Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(8), 2847-2852. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.08.22">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.08.22">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.08.22

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic