HomeScience and Technology Journalvol. 4 no. 1 (2014)

Production, Characterization, Testing, and Evaluation of the MMSU Hydous Bio-Ethanol Potentials as a Village-Scale Enterprise

Shirley C. Agrupis | Roque A. Ulep | Maria Concepcion B. Birginiaa | Fiorello B. Abenes

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This inquiry produced cost efficient protocols of 95% fuel-grade hydrous bioethanol sweet sorghum syrup and evaluated the physicochemical properties and mechanical performance of biofuels from various hydrous gasohol blends. Consequently, it improved the efficiency of previous processes, including that of reducing the yeast activation period from 4-6hr to 1hr and improved the sugar conversion efficiency of ethanol from 70-76% to as high as high as 85%. Specifically, fuel grade hydrous azeotrope ethanol was produced from various feedstock sources such as sugar cane jaggery and sweet sorghum syrup using Saccharomyces cerevisiae for fermentation and reflux distillation system to purify the ethanol. The formulated hydrous gasohol blend, which is the MMSU hBE-20 (consisting of 20% azeotrophic bioethanol and 80% anhydrous E-10 gasoline) was tested to run a stationary 4-stroke engine. At loads of 4, 6, and 8kg, MMSU hBE-20 was as efficient as the commercial XCS E-10. Gasohol blends containing hydrous ethanol up to 40% generally showed comparable performance with MMSU hBE-20 and XCS E10 in terms of physical, chemical, and mechanical properties. Higher blends (50-90% hydrous ethanol) can still run the stationary 4-stroke test engine without discernible mechanical problems but with slightly reduced performance and efficiency. Expanded mixtures of the gasohol blends that were as high as 90% hydrous ethanol; 20% XCS E-10 showed no phase separation at room temperature. As such, producing MMSU 95-hBE at the village level can be highly profitable whether marketed for fuel or for bioethanol-based consumer products.



References:

  1. Agrupis, S.C. et. al., 2013. Hydrous Biofuel Research at MMSU. Proceedings Philippine American Academy of Science and Engineering. Plaza del Norte Convention Center, Laoag City. Philippines. Jan 30-Feb 3, 2013.
  2. Alexandre, H., I. Rousseaux, and C. Charpentier. 1994. Ethanol adaptation mechanisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 20:173-183. [PubMed]
  3. Banat I.M., P. Nigam, D. Singh, P. Marchant, and A.P. McHale. Ethanol production at elevated temperatures and alcohol concentrations. Part I: Yeasts in general. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 1998;14:809e21.
  4. D’Amore T., I. Russell, and G.G. Stewart. “Sugar utilization by yeast during fermentation.” Journal of industrial microbiology 4.4 (1989): 315-323.
  5. Karpov, S. “Ethanol as a High-Octane, Environmentally Clean Component of Automotive Fuels.” Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils 43.5 (2007): 355-61.
  6. Korotney, D. (1995). Water Phase Separation in Oxygenated Gasoline. Www. Epa.gov/OMS/regs/fuels/rfg/waterphs.pdf
  7. Kister, H. (1992). Distillation Design (1st Edition ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  8. Lin Y., S. Tanaka. Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006;69:627e42.
  9. Miller, G.L., Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar, Anal. Chem., 31, 426, 1959.
  10. Nam Sun Wang. Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering. Dinitro salicylic Colorimetric Method. University of Maryland. College Park, MD 20742. 2111,ENCH485
  11. Lin Y., W. Zhang, C. Li, K. Sakakibara, S. Tanka, and H. Kong. 2012. Factors affecting ethanol fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4742. Elsevier. Biomass and Energy XXX. Pp