Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 9 (2026)

The Role Of Apology Proclivity And Perceived Apology Sincerity In Predicting Romantic Relationship Satisfaction Among Filipino Young Adults

Eunice Lumibao | Beatriz B. Gopez

Discipline: Applied Psychology

 

Abstract:

Despite the importance of apologies in repairing interpersonal con-flict and restoring relational harmony, limited empirical research has examined whether apology proclivity and perceived apology sincerity predict romantic relationship satisfaction among Filipino young adults. This study investigated the predictive roles of apology procliv-ity and perceived apology sincerity in predicting romantic relation-ship satisfaction among 418 Filipino young adults aged 21–35 years who were in committed romantic relationships. A quantitative, corre-lational-predictive research design was employed using the Proclivity to Apologize Measure (PAM), the Perceived Apologizer Sincerity measure, and the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-16). Data were ana-lyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman’s rho, and multiple linear regression with heteroskedasticity-consistent (HC3) robust standard errors. The respondents obtained a mean score of 65.70 (SD = 12.90) in relationship satisfaction, a mean score of 5.89 (SD = 1.08) in apol-ogy proclivity, and a mean score of 74 (SD = 11.60) in perceived apol-ogy sincerity. Relationship satisfaction was positively correlated with apology proclivity (p = .47, p < .001) and perceived apology sincerity (p = .62, p < .001), while apology proclivity was also positively corre-lated with perceived apology sincerity (p = .44, p < .001). A multiple linear regression analysis revealed that apology proclivity (B = .12, p = .031) and perceived apology sincerity (B = .70, p < .001) significantly predicted relationship satisfaction, with the model explaining 57.0% of the variance (R2 = .570). Perceived apology sincerity emerged as the stronger predictor of relationship satisfaction. These findings sug-gested that the extent to which apologies were perceived as authentic played a more substantial role in relationship satisfaction than the tendency to apologize itself. The findings contributed to the limited literature on apology processes in Filipino romantic relationships and provided evidence to inform culturally responsive relationship coun-seling, psychoeducational programs, and interventions that promote healthy conflict resolution among young adults.



References:

  1. Abreu-Afonso, J., Ramos, M. M., Queiroz-Garcia, I., & Leal, I. (2021). How couple’s relationship lasts over time?  A model for marital satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 125(3), 1601–1627. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211000651
  2. Akmad, A., & Abatayo, A.  V.  L.  (2024).  Couples under one roof: A quantitative analysis on cohabitation and relationship dynamics. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science., 1(3), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v1i3.162
  3. Alampay, L.  P.  (2024).  Cultural values, parenting and child adjustment in  the  Philippines. International Journal of Psychology, 59(4). 568-777. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13117
  4. Ali, F. (2023). The relationship between culture and conflict: A multidimensional analysis. (2023). Liberal Journal of Language & Literature Review, 1(1). https://llrjournal.com/index.php/11/ar-ticle/view/22
  5. Allen, J.  A., Eden, E., Castro, K.  C., Smith, M., & Mroz, J. E. (2023). “So, why were you late again?”: Social account’s influence on the behavioral transgression of being late to a meeting. Merits, 3(3), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3030027
  6. Armentano, L.  A.  (2021).  How do words and body language diverge? Perceptions, antecedents, and consequences of verbal and nonverbal emotional expressions in close relationships.   In   Yale   University, Yale Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Dissertations. https://elischolar.li-brary.yale.edu/gsas_dissertations/9
  7. Audita, B.N. & Zulkaida, A. (2020). Conflict resolution style and romantic relationship satisfaction among young adults who are dating. International Journal of Research, 07(09), 1-3. https://journals.eduindex.org/in-dex.php/ijr
  8. Barry, C. M., Madsen, S. D., Nelson, L. J., Carroll, J.  S., & Badger, S.  (2009).  Friendship and romantic relationship qualities in emerging   adulthood:   Differential   associations with identity development and achieved adulthood criteria. Journal of Adult Development, 16(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-009-9067-x
  9. Beesley, S. M. (2010). Effect of apology focus on perceptions    of    sincerity, apology    acceptance   and   forgiveness.   Edith   Cowan University. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/1326
  10. Bishop, C. L. (2013). Psychosocial stages of development. The Encyclopedia of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339893.wbeccp441
  11. Bolden, G.  B., Hepburn, A., Potter, J., Zhan, K., Wei, W., Park, S.  H., Shirokov, A., Chun, H. C., Kurlenkova, A., Licciardello, D., Cald-well, M., Mandelbaum, J., & Mikesell, L. (2022).     Over-exposed     self-correction: Practices for managing competence and morality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 55(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2022.2067426
  12. Bühler, J. L., Krauss, S., & Orth, U. (2021). Development of relationship satisfaction across the life span:  A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(10), 1012–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000342
  13. Brown, J.  G.  (2004).  Apology:  The  role  of  apology in negotiation. Marquette Law Review, 665. https://scholarship.law.mar-quette.edu/mulr/vol87/iss4/5
  14. Cohen, T. R., Wolf, S. T., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A.  (2011).  Introducing the GASP scale:  A new measure of  guilt  and shame  proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022641
  15. Chrdileli M., & Kasser,T.  (2018).  Guilt, shame, and apologizing behavior:  A laboratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 135(304-306). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.035
  16. Deniega, C.  F.  D., Revillo, T.  C.  A., & Villanueva, C.  M.  (2024).  Defining the undefined:  Exploring    the    concept    of    situationship among Filipino adolescents.  Sinaya, (3)2, 58–82. https://doi.org/10.59588/3027-9283.1155
  17. Du   Rocher   Schudlich, T.   D.,   Stettler, N.   M., Stouder, K.  A., & Harrington, C.  (2013). Adult   romantic   attachment   and   couple conflict behaviors: Intimacy as a multi-dimensional mediator. Interpersona an International Journal on Personal  Relationships, 7(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v7i1.107
  18. Dunlop, P.  D., Lee, K., Ashton, M.  C., Butcher, S. B., & Dykstra, A. (2015). Please accept my sincere and humble apologies:  The HEX-ACO model of personality and the proclivity to apologize. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.004
  19. Hubbard, A.  S. E., Hendrickson, B., Fehrenbach, K. S., & Sur, J. (2013). Effects of timing and sincerity of an apology on satisfaction and changes in negative feelings during conflicts. Western Journal of Communication, 77(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2013.770160
  20. Feeney, B.C. & Collin, N.L. (2015). A new look at social support:  A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544222
  21. Feist, G.  J., Roberts, T.-A., & Feist, J., & (2021). Theories of personality (Tenth).  McGraw-Hill Education.
  22. Forster, D.   E.,   Billingsley, J.,   Burnette,  J.  L., Lieberman, D., Ohtsubo, Y., & McCullough, M.  E.  (2021).  Experimental evidence that apologies promote forgiveness by communicating relationship value. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92373-y
  23. Folmer, C. P. R., Wildschut, T., Haesevoets, T., De Keersmaecker, J., Van Assche, J., & Van Lange, P. a. M. (2021). Repairing trust between individuals and groups:  the effectiveness of apologies in interpersonal and intergroup  contexts. International Review of Social Psychology, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.479
  24. Funk.  J.  L.  & Rogge, R.  D.  (2007).  Testing the ruler   item response   theory:   Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couple Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572-583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
  25. Gaertner, D. (2011). “The Climax of Reconciliation”: transgression, apology, forgiveness and the body in conflict resolution. Journal of    Bioethical    Inquiry, 8(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-011-9317-z
  26. Gao, S., & Yan, J. (2022). Verbal or written? The impact of apology on the repair of trust: based on competence-vs.  integrity-based trust violation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884867
  27. George, M., Guilfoyle,J.  R., Struthers, C.  W., & Steele, J.  R.  (2025).  An investigation of how gender shapes the appearance and judgment of apologetic faces. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302251322754
  28. Goffman, E.  (1971). Relations in  public:  Microstudies of the public order.  New York: Basic Books, Inc.
  29. Gómez-López, M., Viejo, C., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2019). Well-being and romantic relation-ships: A systematic review in adolescence and   emerging   adulthood. International Journal   of   Environmental   Research   and Public Health, 16(13), 2415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132415
  30. Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/an-nurev.psych.49.1.169
  31. Gottman, J. M. & Levenson, R.W. (2004). A two-factor model for predicting when a couple will divorce:  Exploratory analyses using 14-Year longitudinal data. Family Process, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.40102000083.x
  32. Govender, R. (2022).‘Bouncing back’ from conflict: The role of relationship resilience and hope for reconciliation in romantic couples following     interpersonal     transgressions. [Doctoral  Dissertation,  Flinders  University].
    https://flex.flinders.edu.au/file/0db541c53bf847878e464f6fdc973f80/1/Govender%20Thesis%202022_MasterCopy.pdf
  33. Graziano, F., Mastrokoukou, S., Cattelino, E., Rollè, L., & Calandri, E.  (2024).  Conflict and intimacy in emerging adults’ romantic relationships and depressive symptoms: the mediating role of identity and couple satisfaction. Behavioral Sciences, 14(11), 977. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14110977
  34. Grunenberg, M., Esch, C., Toussaint, L. L., Maes, J., & Kals, E. (2025). Sincerity of apologies: do it right or don’t do it at all. International Journal of Conflict Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-03-2025-0078
  35. Guilfoyle, J.R., Struthers, C.W., Monsjou, E.V., & Shoikhedbrod.  (2019).  Sorry is the hardest word to say: The role of self-control in apologizing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14(1), 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2018.1553715
  36. Hatcher, I.  (2010). “Evaluations of apologies: The effects of apology sincerity and acceptance motivation”.  [Doctoral Dissertation, Marshall University]. https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/628/
  37. Hazan, C.,  &  Shaver, P.  (1987).  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
  38. Hernandez, N.  M., Tampus-Siena, M., & Rung-duin, T.  T.  (2024).  Decoding love signs: The role of perceived relational red flags in mate selection criteria among Filipino young adults. International Review of Social   Sciences   Research, 4(3).    123-146. https://doi.org/10.53378/irssr.353103
  39. Howell, A.  J., Dopko, R.  L., Turowski, J.  B., & Buro, K.  (2011).  Proclivity to apologize measure [Dataset].  In PsycTESTS  Dataset https://doi.org/10.1037/t09886-000
  40. Hopkins, L.  (2013). Revenge or Reconciliation? A Rejection-Based Model of Firm-Induced Relationship Termination.  [Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects, Kennesaw State University]. Paper 581.
    https://digitalcommons.kenne-saw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?arti-cle=1583&context=etd
  41. Javier, J.  R., Galura, K., Aliganga, F.  a.  P., Supan, J., & Palinkas, L.  A.  (2017).  Voices of  the Filipino   community   describing   the   importance of family in understanding  adolescent behavioral health needs. Family & Community Health, 41(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/fch.0000000000000173
  42. Johnson, M. D., Lavner, J. A., Mund, M., Zemp, M., Stanley, S.  M., Neyer, F.  J.,  Impett, E.  A., Rhoades, G. K., Bodenmann, G., Weidmann, R., Bühler, J.  L., Burriss, R.  P., Wünsche, J., & Grob, A.  (2021).  Within-Couple associations between communication   and relationship   satisfaction   over time. Personality   and   Social   Psychology Bulletin, 48(4), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211016920
  43. Józefacka, N.   M.,   Szpakiewicz, E.,   Lech, D., Guzowski, K., & Kania, G.  (2023).  What Matters   in   a   Relationship—Age, sexual satisfaction, relationship length, and interpersonal closeness as predictors of relationship satisfaction in young adults. International Journal of Environmental  Research   and   Public   Health, 20(5),   4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054103
  44. Kelley, D. L., & Waldron, V. R. (2005). An investigation of forgiveness-seeking communication and relational outcomes. Communication Quarterly, 53(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370500101097
  45. Landolt, S. A., Weitkamp, K., Roth, M., Sisson, N. M., & Bodenmann, G.  (2023).  Dyadic coping and mental health in couples:  A systematic   review. Clinical   Psychology   Review, 106, 102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102344
  46. Lahiri, A., & Padmakumari, P.  (2025).  Beyond apologies:   A   systematic   review   of   for-giveness   in   different   relationship   con-texts. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08246-4
  47. Leonard, D. J., Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2011).   Emotional   responses   to   inter-group apology mediate intergroup forgiveness and retribution. Journal of Experimental Social  Psychology, 47(6),  1198–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.002
  48. Lewicki, R. J., Polin, B., & Lount, R. B. (2016). An exploration of the structure of effective apologies. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 9(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12073
  49. Lewis, J.  T., Parra, G.  R., & Cohen, R.  (2015). Apologies in close relationships: A review of theory and research. Journal of  Family Theory & Review, 7(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12060
  50. Lin, Y., Caluori, N., Öztürk, E. B., & Gelfand, M. J. (2022).  From virility to virtue:  the psychology of apology in honor cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of  Sciences, 119(41). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210324119
  51. Ma, F., Wylie, B.  E., Luo, X., He, Z., Jiang, R., Zhang, Y., Xu, F., & Evans, A.  D.  (2019). Apologies repair trust via perceived trust-worthiness and negative  emotions. Fron-tiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00758
  52. Maddux, W. W., Kim, P. H., Okumura, T., & Brett, J.  M.  (2011).  Cultural differences in the function and meaning of apologies. International    Negotiation, 16(3),   405–425. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180611x592932
  53. Medina, B. T. G. (2020). The Filipino family (4th ed.). University of the Philippines Press.
  54. Meltzer, A., Muir, K., & Craig, L.  (2016).  Being trusted:    The    perspectives    of    trusted adults about engaging with young people. Children and Youth Services Review, 63, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.02.010
  55. Mohajan, H.  (2020).  Quantitative research:  A successful investigation in natural and social science. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 9(4), 52-79.  [Retrieved  from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/105149/
  56. Ohtsubo, Y., & Watanabe, E. (2008). Do sincere apologies need to be costly? Test of  a costly signaling model of apology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbe-hav.2008.09.004
  57. Ohtsubo, Y., Yamaura, K., & Yagi, A.  Development of Japanese measures of reconciliatory tendencies: The Japanese trait forgivingness scale and  the  Japanese proclivity to apologize measure. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2). 135-142.  https://doi.org/10.14966/jssp.31.2_135
  58. Painter-Morland,  M.   (2006).   Redefining   accountability as relational responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9046-0
  59. Patalita, C. F., & San Jose, D. B. S. (2025). Couple satisfaction and relationship duration in the Philippines: A quantitative inquiry. International Journal of Innovative Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3).  29-30.
    https://doi.org/10.71123/3067-7319.010304
  60. Rauer, A.  J., Pettit, G.  S., Lansford, J.  E., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K.  A.  (2013).  Romantic relationship patterns in young adulthood and their developmental antecedents. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2159–2171. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031845
  61. Reis, H.T. & Shaver, P.R. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process.  In S.  Duck (Ed.) Handbook of personal relationships:  Theory, research and  interventions (pp.  367-389).  John Wiley & Sons.  Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publica-tion/347687013_Intimacy_as_an_inter-personal_process
  62. Rilveria, J.  R.  C.  (2024).  Towards a culturally sensitive model of therapeutic alliance: Exploring the role of Filipino values and shared realities. Philippine Social Science Journal, 6(4), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v6i4.875
  63. Robles, A.  A., Bote, E.D., & Flores, E.R.  (2020). An investigation of apology strategies employed by Filipino business management learners. DLS Research Congress 2020. Retrieved from https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-con-tent/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2020/LLI-11.pdf
  64. Rumbaut, R.  G.  (2004).  Young adults in the United States:  A profile. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1887827
  65. Rungduin, D.  C., Rungduin, T. T., & Acopio, J.  R. B. (2020). Role of shared identity (kapwa) in forgiving others:   A collectivistic approach in understanding forgiveness. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 35(4), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.33824/pjpr.2020.35.4.3
  66. Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social  Psychology, 45(1), 101–117.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101
  67. Salmela, M. (2005). What is emotional authenticity? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2005.00273.x
  68. Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L.  A.  (2018). Correlation coefficients:  Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002864
  69. Schumann, K., & Ross, M.  (2010).  Why women apologize more than men. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1649–1655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384150
  70. Schumann, K.  (2012).  Does love mean never having to say you’re sorry? Associations between   relationship   satisfaction, perceived apology sincerity, and forgiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(7), 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512448277
  71. Schumann, K., & Orehek, E.  (2017).  Avoidant and defensive: Adult attachment and quality of apologies. Journal of Social and Personal     Relationships, 36(3),    809–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517746517
  72. Schumann, K.  (2019).  Apologies as signals for change?  Implicit theories of personality and   reactions   to   apologies   during   the #MeToo movement. PLoS   ONE, 14(12), e0226047. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour-nal.pone.0226047
  73. Schumann, K., Ritchie, E. G., & Forest, A. (2021). The social consequences of frequent versus   infrequent   apologizing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(3), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211065286
  74. Stanley, S.  M., Rhoades, G.  K., & Whitton, S.  W. (2010b).    Commitment:    functions,   formation, and the securing of romantic attachment. Journal of Family Theory &  Review, 2(4), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00060.x
  75. ten Brinke, L.  T., & Adams, G.  S.  (2015).  Saving face? When emotion displays during public apologies mitigate damage to organizational   performance. Organizational   Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 1–12.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ob-hdp.2015.05.003
  76. Takahashi, R., & Mifune, N.  (2022).  Sincerity is better than forgiveness:  What the  transgressor  expects  in  an  apology. Letters on Evolutionary   Behavioral   Science, 13(2), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.5178/lebs.2022.97
  77. Valipour, M., Golfam, M., Soheili, F., Lanz, M., Amani, A., & Hosseinian, S. (2025). Apologies in couple relationships:  A thematic analysis. Contemporary Family Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-025-09734-2
  78. Vazhappilly, J.  J., & Reyes, M.  E.  S.  (2016).  Couple’s communications as predictor of marital  satisfaction  among  selected  Filipino couples. Psychological Studies, 61(4), 301-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0375-5
  79. Vazhappilly, J. J., & Reyes, M. E.  S. (2016). Non-violent communication and marital relationship:  Efficacy of ‘emotion-focused couples’ communication program among filipino    couples. Psychological    Studies, 62(6).
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-017-0420-z
  80. Wood, D., Crapnell, T., Lau, L., Bennett, A., Lot-stein, D., Ferris, M., & Kuo, A.  (2018). Emerging adulthood as a critical stage in the life course.  Handbook of life course health development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_7
  81. Wubante, M.  (2020).  Review on correlational research. International Journal of  English Literature    and    Culture,   8(4),    99-106. https://doi.org/10.14662/IJELC2020.085
  82. Xia, M., Fosco, G. M., Lippold, M. A., & Feinberg, M. E. (2018). A developmental perspective on young adult romantic relationships: Examining family and individual factors in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(7), 1499–1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0815-8
  83. Yao, S. (2024). Your apology violates my expectation, so i will (not) forgive you.”—An investigation   of   apology   and   forgiveness communication in intercultural romantic relationships. [Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas].
    https://reposito-ries.lib.utexas.edu/server/api/core/bit-streams/800745ca-0bcd-40ae-82e1-41d8009f18e1/content
  84. Yamamoto, K., Kimura, M., & Osaka, M. (2021). Sorry, not sorry: Effects of different types of apologies and self-monitoring on non-verbal behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689615.
  85. Zimmer-Gembeck, M.   J., Madsen, S.   D.,   & Hanisch, M.  (2011).  Connecting the intrapersonal to the interpersonal:  Autonomy, voice, parents, and romantic relationships in emerging adulthood. Euro-pean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(5), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.567061

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic