Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 9 (2026)

21St Century Student Teaching Practices: Inputs To Curriculum Enhancement

Jovita E. Villanueva | Eunice Custodio | Mayleen Dorcas B. Castro

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

The study focused on determining student teaching practices of the College of Education and its cooperating schools and cooperating teachers. It involved 265 student teachers enrolled in the student teaching program of college of education in the academic year 2024-2025. The student teachers were deployed in the different cooperating schools in the divisions of Bulacan and city of Malolos in the province of Bulacan, region III in the Philippines. The concern included deployment practices, supervisory practices, and mentoring practices. The study also included forty-eight (48) cooperating teachers which served as mentors among student teachers during their student teaching activity. Data gathered were taken using a questionnaire and unstructured interview. The questionnaire asked student respondents about the practices being observed pertaining to deployment, supervisory and mentoring. Similar concerns were asked among cooperating teachers. An unstructured interview was also conducted among student teachers’ cooperating teachers via open ended questions. The interview was done to check the congruency of their responses in both interview and questionnaires. The gathered data were treated using weighted mean and standard deviation. Responses in the interview were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results of this study revealed several strengths in the current student teaching model. First, the deployment of student teachers to diverse school contexts provided valuable exposure to real-world classroom dynamics. Student teachers reported gaining firsthand experience in lesson planning, classroom management, and student engagement. Second, many cooperating teachers were found to be highly supportive, providing constructive feedback and modeling professional behavior, which significantly contributed to the development of student teachers’ confidence and competence. Significant findings of the study will be used as inputs to student teaching curriculum enhancement.



References:

  1. Bakija-Haraçija, N., Ferizi-Shala, R., & Walker, T. L.  (2024).  Exploring the value of student teaching practice: Insights from preschool student    teachers    in    Kosovo. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2312217. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2312217
  2. Boyd, D.  J., Grossman, P.  L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S.,     &   Wyckoff, J.     (2009).     Teacher preparation   and   student   achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709345158
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.  (2006).  Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research   in   Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Canipe, M.    M.,    &    Gunckel, K.    L.    (2020). Imagination, brokers, and boundary objects: Interrupting the mentor–preservice teacher hierarchy when negotiating meanings. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118812322
  5. Cleaver, S., Detrich, R., States, J., & Keyworth, R. (2020). Overview of student teaching.  The Wing Institute. https://www.winginstitute.org/pre-service-student
  6. Colson, T., Sparks, K., Berridge, G., Frimming, R., & Willis, C.  (2017).  Pre-service teachers and   self-efficacy:   A   study   in   contrast. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2017-0016
  7. Darling-Hammond, L.   (2014).   Strengthening clinical   preparation:   The   holy   grail   of teacher   education. Peabody   Journal   of Education, 89(4), 547–561.https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2014.938989
  8. Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Defining teaching     quality     around     the     world. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080
  9. DeFeo, D. J., Dogbey-Gakpetor, J., Duffield, S., & Tran, T. C. (2024). The impact of disrupted in-person student teaching on preservice teachers’ perceptions of preparedness. Teaching   and   Teacher   Education, 142, Article 104523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104523
  10. Department   of   Education.   (2017). National adoption    and    implementation    of    the Philippine     Professional     Standards     for Teachers (DepEd Order No.  42, s.  2017). Republic of the Philippines.
  11. Department    of    Education.    (2019). Policy guidelines on the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No.  21, s.  2019). Republic of the Philippines.
  12. Fives, H., Hamman, D., & Olivarez, A.  (2007). Does     burnout     begin     with     student-teaching? Analyzing efficacy, burnout, and support     during     the     student-teaching semester. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 916–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.013
  13. Grisham, D. L., Laguardia, A., & Brink, B. (2000). Partners in professionalism:  Creating a quality   field   experience   for   preservice teachers. Action   in   Teacher   Education, 21(4), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2000.10462981
  14. Grossman, P.  (2010). Learning to practice:  The design   of   clinical   experience   in   teacher preparation (Policy     Brief).     American Association    of    Colleges    for    Teacher Education.
  15. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., &Williamson, P.  W.  (2009). Teaching   practice:   A   cross-professional perspective. Teachers    College    Record, 111(9), 2055–2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
  16. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M.  (2008).  Back to the   future:   Directions   for   research   in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312906
  17. Jessica, H. (2022).  The role of student teaching purposes and its objectives. Global Journal of Teacher Education, 10(2), 1–2.
  18. Nagro, S.  A., & deBettencourt, L.  U.  (2019). Reviewing the effects of video analysis on preservice teacher reflection and teaching execution. Journal   of   Special   Education Technology, 34(4), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419833005
  19. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.  (2006). Professional standards for accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education (2006 ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse.
  20. 240 Tutoring.  (n.d.). Student teaching:  What it is and what to expect.  Retrieved June 30, 2025, from https://www.240tutoring.com/resources/becoming-a-teacher/student-teaching
  21. Whitford, B. L., & Villaume, S. K. (2014). Clinical teacher    preparation:    A    retrospective. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2014.938972
  22. Zeichner, K., & Bier, M.  (2015).  Opportunities and pitfalls in the turn toward clinical experience in US teacher education.  In E. R. Hollins (Ed.), Rethinking field experiences in preservice teacher preparation (pp. 20–46). Routledge.