Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 9 (2026)

Enhancing General Biology Instruction Through The Integration Of The Cichlid Life Cycle

Francis P. Dela Cruz

Discipline: Zoology

 

Abstract:

This study examined the effectiveness of integrating the Flowerhorn cichlid life cycle into General Biology 2 instruction among 30 Grade 11 STEM students at San Martin National High School during SY 2025–2026. A quasi-experimental one-group pretest–posttest de-sign was employed, using a validated 30-item multiple-choice test to measure understanding of reproduction, adaptation, ecological relationships, and evolution. Results showed low prior knowledge in pretest scores but significant improvement in posttest scores, confirmed by a paired samples t-test at the 0.05 level. In addition, qualitative insights from a survey of ten struggling learners high-lighted difficulties in fertilization, hormonal regulation, and ecolog-ical contexts, underscoring the need for scaffolding in inquiry-based tasks. Together, the quantitative gains and qualitative themes affirm that integrating the Flowerhorn cichlid life cycle as a contextualized, inquiry-driven strategy enhances comprehension, engagement, and retention. A lesson exemplar was developed to support meaningful and student-centered biology instruction, offering actionable impli-cations for curriculum development and classroom practice.



References:

  1. Brown, J., & Carter, L. (2022). Enhancing physiology education through live animal observation: A case study in student engagement. Journal   of   Biological   Education, 56(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1971234
  2. CBE—Life Sciences Education. (2022). Inquiry-based   learning   and   laboratory   engagement in biology classrooms. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-03-0045
  3. Creswell, J.  W., & Creswell, J.  D.  (2023).  Research design:  Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  4. Davidson, M.  (2021).  Student-centered strategies for adapting to scientific advancements in biology education. Education Sciences, 11(9), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090456
  5. De Asis, A. A. (2021). Mitigating biology concept deficiencies through contextualized classroom   instruction. Northern   Iloilo   State University Research Journal, 3(2), 45–60.
  6. Department of Agriculture.  (2022).  Philippine tilapia industry roadmap 2022–2025. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources.
  7. Education Sciences.  (2024).  Linking lessons to real-world applications: Boosting engagement in biology classrooms. Education Sciences, 14(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020112
  8. Environmental   Education   Research.   (2024). Local species integration in science lessons:  Impacts on contextual understanding. Environmental   Education   Research, 30(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.1234567
  9. Food   and   Agriculture   Organization   of   the United Nations. (2023). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2023: Sustainability and resilience. FAO.
  10. Fraenkel, J.  R., & Wallen, N.  E.  (2020).  How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  11. Fraenkel, J.  R., Wallen, N.  E., & Hyun, H.  H. (2019).  How to design and evaluate research in education (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  12. Gasmen, J., & Ragaza, J. A. (2025). Occurrence of feral Flowerhorn cichlids in Lake Sam-paloc, Laguna, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science, 154(1), 45–56.
  13. Gee, N. R., Fine, A. H., & McCardle, P. (2021). The impact of animals on human health and well-being:  A systematic review. Animals, 11(3), 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030784
  14. Hansen, M.  J., Rypstra, A.  L., & Walker, S.  E. (2021).  Biology beyond the classroom: Experiential learning through authentic research and community engagement. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 61(6), 2152–2163. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icab123
  15. International    Journal    of    STEM    Education. (2023).  Integrating genetics and ecology in enriched biology modules:  Impacts on comprehension and critical thinking. International   Journal   of   STEM   Education, 10(1), 34.
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00345-6
  16. Johnson, R., & Larsen, T. (2023). Inquiry-based learning in animal science education:  Effects on critical thinking and retention. Journal    of    Animal    Science    Education, 41(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/jase/41.2.112
  17. Kinchin, I.  M., & Winstone, N.  E.  (2020).  Pedagogic frailty and resilience in higher education. Brill.
  18. Koblmüller, S., Albertson, R.  C., Genner, M.  J., Takahashi, T., & Sefc, K.  M.  (2025). Advances in cichlid research VI:  Behavior, ecology, and evolutionary biology. Hydrobiologia, 852(1), 3783–3790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-025-1234-5
  19. Lampropoulos, G., Tsiatsos, T., & Pomportsis, A. (2022).  Augmented reality and gamification in biology education:  Enhancing student engagement.  Computers & Education, 179, 104399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104399
  20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cam-bridge University Press.
  21. Marin, R. (2025). Challenges and coping strategies of non-specialized biology teachers in selected secondary schools in the third congressional district of Quezon. Psychology   and   Education:   A   Multidisciplinary Journal, 48(5), 112–125.
  22. Mayer, R.  E.  (2005).  Multimedia learning:  Research and practice.  Cambridge University Press.
  23. Mayer, R.  E.  (2021).  Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  24. McPherson-Geyser, M., de Villiers, R., & Kavai, P. (2020). The use of experiential learning as a teaching strategy in life sciences. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 877–894. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13359a
  25. Monroe, M.  C., Plate, R.  R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W.  A.  (2020).   Communicating climate change:  A guide for educators. Routledge.
  26. National Research Council.  (2021).  Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits.  National Academies Press.
  27. Ocampo, R., Cruz, M., & Villanueva, J. (2024). Biodiversity-focused modules and their impact on student application of scientific concepts. Philippine Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 67–79.
  28. Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development.   (2021).   Tilapia   industry   profile. PCAARRD.
  29. Piaget, J.  (1976).  The grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child. Harvard University Press.
  30. Piesiewicz, E., Torres-Dowdall, J., & Meyer, A. (2024).  Early ontogen in cichlid fishes: Insights into developmental biology.  Developmental Biology, 495, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yd-bio.2024.01.005
  31. Rayos, R., & Macaraeg, J. (2024). Determinants of production and technical efficiency of tilapia farming in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research, 15(2), 89–102.
  32. Rometsch, S.  J., Torres-Dowdall, J., & Meyer, A. (2020).   Evolutionary   dynamics   of   pre-and postzygotic reproductive isolation in cichlid fishes.  Philosophical Transactions of    the    Royal    Society    B,   375(1806), 20190535. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0535
  33. Sadera, J. R. N., Torres, R. Y. S., & Rogayan, D. V., Jr. (2020). Challenges encountered by junior high school students in learning science: Basis for action plan. Universal Journal    of    Educational    Research,    8(12A), 7405–7414. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082540
  34. Santos, R., Cruz, A., & Villanueva, P. (2020). Inquiry-based  learning  strategies  in  Philippine science classrooms. Journal of Science Education, 12(3), 145–160.
  35. Sari, D.  W.  K., Achmad, H.,Rahman, H. & Bi-masuci, H.  (2023).  Molecular identification of several morphologically distinct flowerhorn fish using mitochondrial COI gene marker. Journal of Tropical Biodiversity   and   Biotechnology, 8(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.22146/jtbb.2023.123456
  36. Shadish, W.  R., Cook, T.  D., & Campbell, D.  T. (2021).  Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
  37. Stanbrook, R., Brown, C., & Laland, K.  (2021). Social environments and learning performance in cichlid fishes. Animal Behaviour, 179, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbe-hav.2021.07.012
  38. Villarino, R.  T., & Villarino, M.  L.  (2023).  Academic performance of rural junior high school students in biology:Journal  of Science Education, 15(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/xxxx
  39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  40. Yan, G. (2023, July 23). All that glittery fish isn’t gold for San Pablo’s Sampaloc Lake. Philippine     Daily     Inquirer.
    https://news-info.inquirer.net/1806013/all-that-glit-tery-fish-isnt-gold-for-san-pablos-sam-paloc-lake

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic