HomeAugustinianvol. 22 no. 1 (2021)

Effectiveness of the Theology Curriculum of the University of San Agustin

Rodel D Magin

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the Theology curriculum of the University of San Agustin in terms of its objectives, relationship to the contemporary standards, appropriateness of topic presentation, pacing, and timeliness. It also studied how the current theology curriculum affects the students in terms of their Augustinian formation, spiritual enrichment, and test scores, and kinds of technology-based modalities and assessments are used in the current technology. However, it did not involve the effectiveness of the Theology teachers. The study was based on the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product) evaluation model, a program evaluation model developed by Daniel Stufflebeam and colleagues in the 1960s. A questionnaire checklist with a formulated scale was utilized to determine the effectiveness of the Theology curriculum among Augustinian students during the Academic Year 2020-2021 from different colleges/departments of the University of San Agustin. The respondents were the students, Theology faculty members, the alumni presently working at the University of San Agustin, and the administrators. The results showed that the current curriculum in Theology is very effective, and greatly affects the students in terms of their Augustinian formation, spiritual enrichment, and test scores. Furthermore, the technology-based modality used in the online classroom particularly the Neo-LMS, and the assessment tools used, are both effective. Finally, the result also showed that there is no significant difference in how the students, faculty, administration, and the alumni working at the University of San Agustin perceive the level of effectiveness of the current curriculum in Theology. Therefore, the respondents think of the same way in assessing the current Theology curriculum. However, certain measures should be developed to maintain and further improve the USA Theology curriculum, which should be anchored in the Order’s mandate to promote Augustine and his teachings.



References:

1. Alghafri A. S. and H. N. Ismail (2014). The Effects of Integrating Creative and Critical Thinking on Schools Students' Thinking. In International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 4, No. 6, November 2014. Retrieved on December 5, 2021. Retrieved from http://ijssh.org/papers/410-CH351.pdf

2. Almoslamani, Y. (2018). Effectiveness of Student Engagement Using Learning Management System in the Blended Learning Environment at Saudi Electronic University. Published Doctor of Philosophy dissertation, University of Northern Colorado.

3. Aslan,D. &Günay, R. (2016). “An Evaluation of High School Curricula Employing Using the Element-based Curriculum Development Model.” InJournal of Education and Training Studies.

4. Blumberg, B., Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2005). Business Research Methods. Berkshire: McGrawHill Education.

5. Carr J. C., & Harris, D. E. (2001). Succeeding with Standards: Linking Curriculum, Assessment, and Action Planning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

6. Chatterjee, D. & Corral, J (2017). The Journal of Education in Perioperative Medicine. How to Write Well-Defined Learning Objectives. Retrieved on December 5, 2021. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11125-020-09540-8

7. Doyle, W. (1992). “Curriculum and pedagogy.” In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research in curriculum (pp. 486-516). New York: Macmillan.

8. Fankhauser, J. (2012). Spiritual Expectations And Experiences Of Students at a Faith-Based Institution. Retrieved on December 5, 2021. Retrieved from https://pillars.taylor.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1076&context=mahe

9. Glatthorn, A. (1994). Developing quality curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved on December 5, 2021. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED378641

10. Glatthorn, A. (1995). Content of the Curriculum  (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.  Retrieved on December 5, 2021. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED378641

11. Glatthorn, A. A., (1998). Performance Assessment and Standards-Based Curricula: The Achievement Cycle.   Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.

12. Goldhaber, D. and Ozek, U. (2019). How Much Should We Rely on Student Test Achievement as a Measure of Success? Retrieved on December 5, 2021. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0013189X19874061

13. Haq, A., Shahzad, K., Ahmed, U., Hussain, S., & Sajid, A. (2018). Web technologies used for virtualclassroom. Retrieved on:December 5, 2021 Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348181704_A_Study_on_Effectiveness_of_Online_Learning_System_during_COVID-19_in_Sargodha

14. Heale, R. & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Retrieved on December 5, 2021. Retrieved from https://ebn.bmj.com/content/18/3/66

15. Hoadley, U. (2003) Journal Of Education, University of Capetown, South Africa. Retrieved on December 5, 2021 Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233290877_Time_to_learn_Pacing_and_the_external_framing_of_teachers'_work_1

https://pillars.taylor.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1076&context=mahe

16. Liu, J. (2013). E-learning in E-classroom: Investigating factors impacting on ESL college students’ acceptance and use of the Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment (Moodle). Unpublished Thesis: Iowa State University, Graduate College. Retrieved on:December 5, 2021 Retrieved from: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13256/

17. Noguez, J., Neri, L. (2019). “Research-based learning: a case study for engineering students.” In International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Vol. 13, pp. 1283–1295. Retrieved on December 9, 2021. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00570-x

18. Ornstein, A., &Hunkins, F. (2009). “Curriculum Design.”In Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

19. Paganao, R. (2011). Statistics for the Bahavioral Science. Belmont, CA: Graphic World Publishing Services

20. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 12). Retrieved on December 9, 2021. Retrieved from http://www.muthar-alomar.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/SPSS_Survival_Manual.pdf

21. Palma, J (2012). “400 Years of Catholic Education in the Philippines.” In CBCP Online. Retrieved on December 9, 2021. Retrieved from https://cbcponline.net/a-pastoral-letter-of-the-cbcp-on-the-occasion-of-the-400-years-of-catholic-education-in-the-philippines/

22. Paul VI (1965). “GravissimumEducationis.” In Vatican Archives. Retrieved on December 9, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_gravissimum-educationis_en.html.

23. Perez, R.& Eusebio, D. A (2019). “Perception on Augustinian Values among Senior High School Students of La Consolacion.” In Journal of Religion and Theology. Volume 3, Issue 3, 2019, pp. 9-18. Retrieved on December 9, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.sryahwapublications.com/journal-of-religion-and-theology/pdf/v3-i3/2.pdf

24. Prevost, R. (2008). Rule and Constitutions of the Order of St. Augustine. Text in Latin and English. Rome: Augustinian General Curia.

25. Singh, A. S. (2014). Conducting Case Study Research in Non-Profit Organisations. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 17, 77–84.

26. Stufflebeam, D. (2003). The CIPP model of evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D. Stufflebeam& L. Wingate (Eds.), Springer international handbooks of education: International handbook of educational evaluation.

27. Stufflebeam, D. and A. J. Shinkfield. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications. CA: Jossey-Bass.

28. Stufflebeam, D. and A. J. Shinkfield. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications. CA: Jossey-Bass.

29. Syaad, P. &Hidayat, W. N. The Effectiveness of Learning Management System (LMS) on Computer Assisted Learning Course for Informatics Engineering Education Students; Retrieved on December 9, 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/asp/asl/2018/00000024/00000004/art00111

30. Taylor, J. R. (1999). An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements. University Science Books.

31. Tsang, S.&Terkawi S. (2017). Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Retrieved on December 9, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5463570/

32. Turner, D (2015). Utilizing LMS tools to help with student assessment in an online course.Retrieved on: December 5, 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.netpublication/281806048_Utilizing_LMS_tools_to_help_with_student_assessment_in_an_online_course

33. Ullah, H. (2020). Covid-19 and education: Unequal learning loss. Pakistan Today.Retrieved on: December 5, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2020/05/07/covid-19-education-unequal-learning-loss/.

34. Zimu-Biyela, N. (2019). “Using the School Environmental Education Programme (SEEP) to Decolonise the Curriculum: Lessons from Ufasimba Primary School in South Africa.” In Journal of African Renaissance Studies. DOI: 10.1080/18186874.2019.1614468.