Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 4 no. 7 (2022)

Industrial Revolution Technology Adopted and Its Influence on the Operational Performance of Hospitality Industry in Guiuan Eastern Samar

Renalyn Buntalilio | Conrado Lombrio

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The technology innovation transformed the way hotels do business, allowing them to save time, manpower, and workload. When looking for various hotel information, it is definitely available on the internet and can be accessed at any time and from any location via Facebook, Instagram, or other social media platforms. The main focus of this study was to assess the status of 4.0 Industrial Revolution Technology adopted by hotels in Guiuan, Eastern Samar. This study used a descriptivecorrelational method of research. This is descriptive research since it describes the existing conditions on the profile of hotel industry in terms of the use of social platforms, online engagement, online application, opportunities and challenges facing of hotels technology adoption. It is also a correlational study since it determined the relationship between the profile of hotel industry adoption and utilization and the operation performance of the hotels under study. In the profile of hotel industry in terms of social platforms the Facebook was the commendable social platforms used by hotels in Guiuan Eastern Samar. The study revealed that the respondent has less commendable used of online engagement and online application relative to Industrial Revolution 4.0. As for the challenges, the respondents were undecided on the positive influence of the 4.0 technology to their operational performance. However, the profile of the respondent was significantly related to the operational performance with index of correlation of 0.547 and p-value of .041 which was found to be significant at .05 level. Hence, the null hypothesis which stated that there was no significant relationship between the profile of hotel industry and the operational performance of the hotels was rejected. Thus, it is recommended that hospitality industry in Guiuan Eastern Samar should be responsive of the significance of the 4.0 Industrial revolution in all areas of hotel operation. Hence, the competition now a days focuses on modernization of hotel establishment. They need to educate their workforce about the value of the Industry 4.0 for the future and the initial steps that the organization needs to take toward the implementation. Moreover, adaptation of 4.0 Industrial Revolution increases hotel revenue and sales.



References:

  1. Alber, S. R., & Nelson, J.S. (2002). Putting Research in the Collaborative Hands of Teachers and Researchers: An Alternative to Traditional Staff Development.
  2. Borg, S. (2014). Teacher research for professional development. In Pickering, G and Gunashekar, P (Eds.), Innovation in English Language Teacher Education. (pp.23-28). Selected papers from the Fourth International Teacher Educator Conference Hyderabad, India
  3. Boykin, L. (1972). Why Research in Education? Retrieved D e c e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 1 7 f r o m http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_197204_boykin.pdf
  4. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: a guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge Cain, T. and Milovic, S. (2010). Action research as a tool of professional development of advisers and teachers in Croatia. European Journal o f T e a c h e r E d u c a t io n , 3 3 ( 1 ) , 1 9 - 3 0 .
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760903457768
  5. Caingcoy, M. (2020, July). Research Capability of Teachers: Its Correlates, determinants and Implication for Continuing Professional Development. Bukidnon, Philippines.
  6. Calderon, J. F. & Gonzales, E.C. (1993). Methods of Research and Thesis Writing. Manila: National Book Store
  7. Ciocon, J. L. (2018). Research Capability of Grade 12 Students. International Journal of Thesis Projects and Dissertations (IJTPD) (Vol. 6, Issue 3, pp: (23-30), Month: July – September 2018, Available at: https://www.researchpublish.com/
  8. CJ Cocal, 2017. Educational research productivity road map: Conclusions from the identified research barriers and variables. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1274112.pdf
  9. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative and quantitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  10. Darling-Hammond, L. (1992). Teaching and knowledge: Policy issues posed by alternative certification for teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 67, 3, 123-154
  11. Deen & Lucas, 2006. Learning About Research: Exploring the Learning and Teaching/Research Relationship Amongst Educational P r a c t i t i o n e r s S t u d y i n g i n H i g h e r Education.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248966459
  12. Department of Education Memo Order Nos.: 4, s. 2016 and 43 and 13, s. 2015. Adoption of the Basic Education Research Agenda. http://www.deped.gov.ph/orders/do-39-s-2016
  13. DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017.” The DepEd Research Management Guidelines (RMG).”
  14. DepEd Order No. 39, s. 2016. Adoption of the Basic Education Research Agenda. http://www.deped.gov.ph/orders/do-39-s-2016 16
  15. DepEd Order No. 43, s. 2015 Revised Guidelines for the Basic Education Research Fund (BERF)
  16. D e p E d O r d e r N o . 2 4 s. ( 2 0 1 0 ) . http://www.deped.gov.ph/orders/do-39-s-2016.14.
  17. Egbert, Robert L., Ed., and Kluender, Mary M. Ed. (2015) Using Research to Improve Teacher Education: The Nebraska Consortium. Teacher education Monograph No.1. (SP 024 8888), p9- 21.
  18. Elmore, & Lewis, 1991. The Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics S c a l e : A C o n s t r u c t V a l i d i t y S t u d y . https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013164404272488
  19. Fuentes, H.C. (2017). Research Competency of Teacher Education Students in Eastern Samar State University Main Campus. Cebu International Conference on Studies in Business, Management, Education, and Law. January 26.
  20. Hairon, S. (2017. Teacher Leadership in Singapore: The Next Wave of Effective Leadership. Research in educational Administration and Leadership, 2(2), 170- 194.DOI:10.30828/real/2017.2.3
  21. H a w k i n s , ( 1 9 9 9 ) . T h e A r t o f B u i l d i n g Windmills.https://www.vitae.ac.uk/doing-research/doing-a-doctorate /starting-a-doctorate/overcoming-challenges-common-to-doctoral researchers
  22. Hien, T.T.T. (2009). Why is action research suitable for education? VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages 25, 97-106. http://tapchi.vnu.edu.vn/nn_2_09/b4.pdf
  23. Hine, G.S.C. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2): Special Issue. http://www.iier.org.au/iier23/hine.pdf
  24. Hong, C.E. & Lawrence S.A. (2011). Action Research in teacher education: Classroom inquiry, reflection, and data driven decision making. I Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 4(2). https://www.wpunj.edu/dotAsset/330733.pdf
  25. HW Marsh, 2002. Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering
  26. Joosten, T., Harness, L., and Cusatis, R. (May, 2016). https://uwm.edu/deta/top-5-challenges-in-conducting-deta-research
  27. Kuhn, T. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Fourth Edition 2012) University of Chicago Press 1962.
  28. Lew, M. M. (2014, February). How do Pre-service Teachers Develop Understanding of Student Learning through Action Research Project. Western Michigan University.
  29. Lucernas, D. &. (2019). Research Competencies of master Teachers in the Province of Masbate: Basis for Training Development. Masbate, Masbate, Philippines.
  30. Mahani, S. (2012). Enhancing the quality of teaching and learning through action research. Journal of College Teaching & Learning – T h i r d Q u a r t e r . 9 ( 3 ) . http://search.proquest.com/docview/1418715762?pq-origsite=gscholar
  31. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v9i3.7086 McNiff, J. (2010) Action research for professionaldevelopment: Concise advice for new and experienced action researchers. Dorset: September Books.
  32. Maher, Timmerman, Hurst, & Gilmore, 2009. Faculty Mentors’, Graduate Students’, and Performance-Based Assessments of S t u d e n t s ’ R e s e a r c h S k i l l D e v e l o p m e n t .https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0002831214549449
  33. Meerah, S. M. (2013). What is "Action" in Action Research: A Malaysian Exposure. Malaysia. DOI:10.5539/ass. v9n16p148
  34. Middaugh, M. (2001). Perceptions and attitudes toward research. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 47: 222-228
  35. Morales, M.P.E. (2016). Participatory Action Research (PAR) cum Action Research (AR) in teacher professional development: A literature review. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(1), 156-156.
  36. NA Alhija, 2017. Predictors of Teacher Educators' Research Productivity. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1161174.pdf
  37. O’Connor, K. A., Greene, H. C., & Anderson, P. J. (2006). Action research: A tool for improving teacher quality and classroom practice. Ontario Action Research, 9(1).
  38. Postholm, M. B. (2018, September). “Teacher’s Professional Development in School: A Review Study.
  39. Presidential Decree 1788. Republic Act 7722. Higher Education Act of 1994.
  40. West, C. (2011). Action research as a professional development activity. Arts Education Policy Review, 112:89–94.
  41. Young, M. R., Rapp, E., & Murphy, J. W. (2010). Action research: Enhancing classroom practice and fulfilling educational responsibilities. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3(1)

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic