HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 6 no. 7 (2022)

The Effect of Computer-Aided Lesson on the Performance of High School Sophomore Students in Selected Topics Biology

Mar Ocampo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study determined the effect of computer-aided lesson on the performance of high school sophomore students in selected topics in biology at Baras National High School, Baras Rizal. The selected topic is based on the least scored correct response of the Division Achievement Test that given by the researcher. The identified topics are Cell, Reproduction, Life Energy and Organ. A pre-test was developed pilot tested to 50 third years high school students . The test questions were item analyzed and used as the pre test and post test of the study. The used CAI in Biology used in the study is issued by the Department of Education as one of the instructional supplies of the school. The respondents were selected through purposive sampling. It involved two sections of the second year. Each section consists of forty-five (45) students. The first group was the control group who were taught using the traditional method while the second group were taught using Computer-Aided Instruction. Since the used respondents are heterogeneous in nature, variables such as grades are no longer considered in the study. Other variables such as grades of the students is not included since the study focused on the effect of the Computer aided instructional material focusing on the result of the pretest and post- test. The questionnaire checklist used is adopted in the study of Robles. Pre-test was administered to the two groups which was prior to the use of the traditional method and computer aided instruction. After which posttest was administered. The data gathered were statistically analyzed and interpreted. The result of the study was used to develop the enhanced computer aided instructional activities in Biology. Those who were taught the traditional way have an average raw score of 9.04 with numerical value of 75 and coefficient of variation 36.28 of which is equivalent to poor performance. Those who were taught with computer aided lessons in biology got the average raw score of 8.67 with equivalent score of 75 and a coefficient of variat ion of 28.49 equivalents to poor performance. The students performed best in the topic life energy, followed by organ system then by cell structure and performed least on reproduction. Topic Organ System, the F value obtained is 17.971 with p-value of 0.000 which is less than the apha .05, therefore the null hypothesis is rejected. There is significant difference between the performance of the students exposed to computer aided lessons and those taught using the traditional method.



References:

  1. Alferez, Cristina C.,” The level of Acceptability of Constructed instructional Materials in Teaching Light Waves”,URSM,2004.
  2. Aparejo,Enrique L. “Development and Validation of Modules in Mathematics I For Freshman High School Students”, Unpublished Thesis, EARIST, Manila, 2000 .
  3. Balmaceda, Ande,” The Effectiveness of innovative Teaching Strategies on the Academic Performance of Grade Six Pupils In Science and Technology
  4. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Rizal System Morong, Rizal. February 2007
  5. Bautista,Rommel C.’The Computer Education Program in the Division of Rizal: An Evaluation, Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Rizal System Morong,Rizal. February 2006
  6. Binaluyo,Jose E. “development and Validation of TechnologyBased Modules in Trigonometry, Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Rizal System Morong,Rizal. February 2007
  7. Castillo,Cecilia Bundia.” Determinants of the Performance of the Students in Science and Technology in the Division of Laguna: An Input to Staff Development Program ,Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Rizal System Morong, Rizal. February 2006
  8. Celestra,Maria Rosa O.”The Effectiveness of Module in Science on the Academic Performance of Grade Three Pupils” Unpublished Masters Thesis, 2007
  9. David, Lyndel R. “Developed and Validated Enhancement Activities in Optics” URSM, 2009.
  10. Delialioglu, O. & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Design and development of a technology enhanced hybrid instruction based on MOLTA model: Its effectiveness in comparison to traditional instruction, Computers & Education
  11. Doblada, Vivencio M.” The Effect of Enrichment Activities on the Performance of Fourth Year Students in Trigonometry” Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Rizal System Morong,Rizal. 2007
  12. Espiritu, Mary Jane T. “Effectiveness of Exploratory Method in Teaching Information and Communication Technology for Grade IV Pupils” Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Rizal System Morong, Rizal. 2007
  13. Flores, Aurora DU. “ Development And Validation of Reading Materials in Filipino For Grade I Pupils”, Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Rizal System Morong, Rizal. February 2005
  14. Mateo, Lolita S. “Effects of Different Strategies in Teaching English and Math for Grade Four Pupils. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis, URSM 2008)
  15. Nepomuceno, Marites W. “Development and Evaluation of Computer Aided Module in Selected Topic Algebra.” Unpublished Thesis, URSM. 2005
  16. Odi,Aida.M.” Development and Validation of Modules in Biology” Unpublished Masters Thesis, Marikina Institute of Technology, February 2006
  17. Paat, Virgilio O., “ Development and Validation of Instructional Materials In teaching Selected Topics In Genetics” Masters Thesis, URSA, 2007.
  18. Petero, Noel, J. “ Development and Evaluation of Computer – Based Lectures On Problem Solving In Mathematics” Luzon Science Consortium, Vol. 3 No.2, 2008
  19. Plegaria, Suzette S. et. al., “Development of e – Learning Module As Instructional Material In Teaching Genetics” URSM, 2010
  20. Portillo, Rosa F.,” Computer – Aided Intervention Materials (CAIM) In Teaching Biology for Differently Abled Students”, URSM, 2009.
  21. Quintal, Alicia N. “Multiple Intelligence of College Students and Their Performance in Co-Curricular Activities” Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Rizal System Morong, Rizal. February 2005
  22. Robles, Andrewpov P. ”Development and Validation of Computer Aided Modules In Selected Topics in General Science” , Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Rizal System Morong, Rizal. February 2007
  23. San Antonio, Eleonor P. “ Development and Validation of Worktext in Physics 2 for College Students” University of Rizal System, Morong Campus, 2007.
  24. She, H-C. & Lee, C-Q. (2008). SCCR digital learning system for scientific conceptual change and scientific reasoning, Computers & Education
  25. So, Kirk F.,” Development Effectiveness and Acceptability of Module With Computer Aided instruction ( CAI) In Teaching Human Organ System.” , Masters Thesis URSM, 2009.
  26. Tunque, Rhea G.,” Validated Modules In Applied Chemistry For First year Bachelor of Technical Education”, Unpublished Masters Thesis, MIST, 2003.
  27. Vivencio, Lizaline c. “The Effectiveness of Proposed Module in Teaching Selected Topics in Biochemistry” Unpublished Masters Thesis, Centro Escolar University Graduate School, 2001.
  28. Yuen-kuang Cliff Liao Effects of computer-assisted instruction on students’ achievement in Taiwan: A meta-analysis References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article. Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Published Thesis. July 2004;
  29. Zotomayor, Ma. Alegria L. “ Construction and Validation of Learning Modules in cytology: An Alternative Approach”,Laguna Polytechnic College, Siniloan Laguna, 2001.