Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 11 no. 9 (2023)

Mediating Effects of Teacher’s Assessment Competencies on the Relationship Between the Use of the Zipgrade Application and Student’s Achievement

Mikko John Rodillas | Edna Briones | Edilberto Andal

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study was conducted to determine the interactions between and among teacher’s assessment competence, zipgrade application and junior high school student’s achievement in ICT.The researcher selected the one hundred twenty five (125) Grade 9 students from different sections in the Junior High School namely: Grade 9 Wisdom, Grade 9 Integrity and Grade 9 Perseverance of Luis Palad Integrated High School. The researcher used random sampling technique to fill up the required number of samples.The researcher used descriptive research design and utilized a survey questionnaire as the main tool in gathering the pertinent data needed to solve the problems of the study.The significant findings of this study revealed that the features of zipgrade application were perceived by the respondents very efficient, highly functional, very accurate, very easy to use and used by them to a very great extent.On the account of teachers’ assessment competencies the respondents rate themselves very competent in all measures of assessment competencies included in the study. On the other hand student’s achievement both in unit and summative test fell under advanced level.On the relationship between zipgrade application and teacher’s assessment competencies, findings show significant relationship. Moreover, there is no significant relationship between teacher’s assessment competencies and student’s achievement, while zipgrade application features do not significantly relates with students’ achievement except ease of use which relates significantly with the students’ summative test. Since, the findings revealed significant and non – significant relationship among variables, it is concluded that for those variables with significant relationship, the null hypothesis stated in the study is not sustained while those without significant relationship the hypothesis posited is sustained.



References:

  1. Abdul Majeed., and Al-Tayib Umar. (2018). The impact of Assessment for learning on Students’ Achievement in English for Specific Purposes. English Language Teaching, Volume 11, No. 2. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1166124.pdf
  2. Abdullahi Mahadalle & Dr. Burcin Kaplan. (2017). Entreprenuerial Characteristics and Competencies as Determinants of corporate performance: a study on small entreprises in Mogadishu,    Somalia. International    Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, A knowledge Repository.  https://granthaalayah.com/Articles/Vol5Iss5/24_IJRG17_A05_312.pdf
  3. Andrea Haberman. (2021). Student Examination Performance Predictors: The Cramming Study Strategy and Examination Format. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1078&context=etds
  4. Ayranci., Bilige Bagci and Baskan Ahmet. (2021). Competence Areas a new notion instead of teacher competencies. Education Quarterly Reviews, Volume 4. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Teacher+competence+on+planning+teaching+related+literature+and+studies&id=EJ1300603
  5. Alexander Tittel & Orestis Terzidis. (2020). Entreprenuerial competences revised: developing a consolidated and categorized list of entrepreneurial competences. Entrepreneurship Education. Volume 3, pages 1-35. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41959-019-00021-4
  6. Anasi Nadia (2020). An analysis of teacher competence on teaching learning process of English at smait IQRA KOTA BENGKULU. http://repository.iainbengkulu.ac.id/4916/1/skripsi%20annisa%20pdf.pdf
  7. Arlen                R.        Gullickson.      (2013). Accuracy        of         Standards. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-student-evaluation- standards/d13.xml
  8. Asbjorn Folstad. (2017). Users’ design feedback in usability evaluation: a literature review. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences. Volume 7, Article number 19. https://hcis-journal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13673-017-0100-y
  9. Bella Ross., Anne Marie Chase., Diane Robbie., Grainne Oates and Yvette Absalom. (2018). Adaptive quizzes to increase motivation, engagement and learning outcomes in a first year accounting unit. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, Volume 15, Articlle no. 30. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s4 1239-018-0113-2
  10. Carolina M. Barcellos., Leonardo C. Dos Santos., Lais C. Da Silva., Jose A. Bachur., Jorge L. Da Silva., Danilo Bulgo & Lilian Cristina G. Do Nascimento. (2020) The quality and lifestyle of universitaries: an integrative literature review. International Journal of Development Research. Volume 10, Article 18956, 11 pages. https://www.journalijdr.com/quality-and-lifestyle-universitaries-integrative-literature-review
  11. Cherner, T., Lee, C-Y., Fegely, A., & Santaniello, L. (2016). Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice. A Detailed Rubric for Assessing the Quality of Teacher Resource Apps. Volume 15, 117-143. https://jite.org/documents/Vol15/JITEv15IIPp117-143Cherner2544.pdf
  12. Chin Huan., Chew Cheng Meng., Lim Hooi Lian and Thien Lei Mee. (2022). Development and Validation of a Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment with Ordered Multiple-Choice Items for Addition of Time. International Journal of Science          and Mathematic Education, Volume 20, n4, p817-837. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Teacher+competence+on+developing+valid+pupil+grading&ff1=dtySince_2013&id=EJ1328679
  13. Chris Patlingrao (2020). Utilization of Zipgrade Application to Lessen the Burden of Teachers in Libi Integrated School. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341029693_UTILIZATION_OF_ZIPGRADE_APPLICATION_TO_LESSEN_THE_BURDEN_OF_TEACHERS_IN_LIBI_INTEGRATED_SCHOOL
  14. Cynthia J. Brame and Rachel Biel. (2015). Test-enhanced learning: the potential for testing to promote greater learning in undergraduate science courses. Journal of Education, Volume1 4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477741/
  15. Dasrieny Pratiwi., Herawati Susilo and Fatchur Rohman. (2020). Teacher Competency and Perception in Lesson Planning using a software prototype. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, Volume         13, Issue 3. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol_13/Iss_3/133101_Pratiwi_2020_E_R.pdf
  16. Desak Made Ari., and Nyoman Adi Jaya. (2022). Developing Online Formative Assessment Using Quizizz for Assessing Reading Competency of the Tenth Grade Students in Buleleng Regency. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, Volume 4, No. 1. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JIPP/article/view/24169
  17. Dina Ocampo., Kathrina Lorraine M. Lusacan. Key Issues in Curriculum, Assessment and ICT in Basic Education. (2019) https://cids.up.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Key-Issues-in-Curriculum-Assessment-and-ICT-in-Basic-Education-2019.pdf
  18. Do Tra Huong and Nguyen Thi Dieu Linh. (2021). A competence Model to assess and develop designing competence assessment tool. Volume 20, No. 2. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2984
  19. Drs. Sudirman. (2017). Efforts to Improve Teacher Competence in Developing a Lesson Plan through Sustainable Guidance in SMKN 1 Mamuju. Journal of Education    and    Practice,    Volume    8,    No.    5. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1133109.pdf
  20. Elenita Natalio Que (2021). Sustaining Successful ICT Integration in Remote Rural Schools. Pertanik. Journals. http://119.40.116.186/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JSSH%20Vol.%2029%20(3)%20Sep.%202021/02%20JSSH-5276-2019.pdf
  21. Francesca Caena. (2011) Education and Training 2020 Thematic Working Group Professional            Development  of         Teachers’. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344906332_Literature_review_Teachers'_core_competences_requirements_and_development
  22. Francis Ofori., Elizaphan Maina., Rhoda Gitonga. Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Students Performance and Improve Learning Outcome: A Literature Based Review.         Volume            4          No.      1          (2020) https://stratfordjournals.org/journals/index.php/Journal-of-Information-and- Techn/article/view/480
  23. Gavin T.L. Brown., Heidi Andrade and Fei Chen. (2015). Accuracy in student self- assessment: direction and cautions for research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271270642_Accuracy_in_student_self-assessment_Directions_and_cautions_for_research
  24. Ghataura         Deep   (2018). Validity of         Formative        Assessment. https://dghataura.wordpress.com/2018/01/29/validity-of-formative-assessment/
  25. Gikandi, J.W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N.E., (2011). Computer and Education. Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature Volume 57, Issue 4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131511001333
  26. Horta, M. J., Mendonca, f., & Nascimento, R., (2012). Information and Communication   and   Technologies   7th and 8th grades. https://www.seguranet.pt/sites/default/files/ict-_curricular_goals.pdf
  27. Jamie Burniston MPT., Faezeh Eftekhari MPT., Sarah Hrabi MPT., Rachel Worsley MPT & Elizabeth Dean PhD. (2012) Health behavior change and lifestyle-related condition prevalence: comparison of two epochs based on systematic review of the physical therapy literature. Hong Kong Physiotherapy   Journal.   Volume   30,   Issue   2,   pages   44-56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702512000267
  28. Jil Johnes., Maria Portela & Emmanuel Thanassoulis (2017). Efficiency in Education. Journal of the Operational Research Society Volume 68, pages 331-338.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41274-016-0109-zJon K. Price, Ph D., Elizabeth Pierson and Daniel Light, Ph D. (2011). Using Classroom Assessment to Promote 21st century learning in Emerging Market Countries. https://cct.edc.org/sites/cct.edc.org/files/publications/Using%20Classroom%20Assessment.pdf
  29. Kalykbayeya Almagul., Autayeya Akbota., Orazayeya Gulzhan., Kassymzhanova Gulnar., Zhigibekoya Bakyt and Bekmuratova Gulzhanar. (2022). The Attitude of Teachers toward students’ self-assessment of educational achievement in inclusive education lessons. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, Volume 17 n2 p643-651. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=efficiency+in+assessment+tool+related+literature+and+studies&ft=on&ff1=dtySince_2013&id=EJ1331883
  30. Karadag Nedjet., Ozgur and Aydin Ziya. (2020). Assessment and Evaluation in Mega Universities. Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology- TOJET, Volume 19 n14 p35-49. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=functionality+in+assessment+tool+related+literature+and+studies&ft=on&ff1=dtySince_2013&id=EJ1272847
  31. K. R. Pillai., Pallavi Upadhyaya., Asnish Viswanath Prakash., Badrinarayan Srirangam Ramaprasad., H. V. Mukesh & Yogesh Pai. (2021). End-user satisfaction of technology-enabled assessment in higher education: a coping theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies. Volume 26, pages 35677-3698. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-020-10401-2
  32. Kaitlyn E. May & Anastasia D. Elder (2018). Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A Literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Volume 15, Article number 13.
  33. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-018-0096-z
  34. Keller Tamas. (2016). Sticky Assessments-The impact of teachers’ grading standard on pupils school performance. Educational Studies, Volume 42, n5, p493-518.  https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Teacher+competence+on+developing+valid+pupil+grading&ff1=dtySince_2013&pg=3&id=EJ1116050
  35. Kerryn Butler-Henderson & Joseph Crawford. (2020). A systematic review of online examinations. A pedagogical innovation for scalable authentication and integrity. Volume 16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508171/
  36. Kevin Seifert and Rosemary Sutton. (2013). Teacher made assessment strategies. https://granite.pressbooks.pub/teachingdiverselearners/chapter/teacher- made-assessment-strategies-2/
  37. K.M. Turekhanova., and Zh. Ye. Akimkhanova. (2022). Application of Innovative Educational Technologies in Teaching of Physics for Engineering Specialties. http://vernadsky2019.tstu.ru/trud/pdf/tomIV.pdf#page=195http://vernadsky2019.tstu.ru/trud/pdf/tomIV.pdf#page=195
  38. Kristine DiCarlo., and Lori Cooper. (2014). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Literature Review. Journal of        Instructional Research. Volume 10. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1127645.pdf
  39. Lee Yong Tay., Shanthi Suraj Nair., and Cher Ping Lim (2018). Old Wine in New Bottle? How Technologies are Being Used in an Elementary School in Singapore. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-7155- 3_10
  40. Looney, J, (2019) European Commission. Digital Formative Assessment: A Review of the Literature. http://www.eun.org/documents/411753/817341/Assess%40Learning+Literature+Review/be02d527-8c2f-45e3-9f75-2c5cd596261d
  41. Lia Amalia and Tressy Saraswati. (2018). The Impact of Competencies Toward Teacher’s Performance Moderated by the Certification in Indonesia. https://knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/view/3363/7083
  42. Lyn Besa., Jazel C. Erquiza and Richard Parcon. (2019). K to 12 Assessment: The Periodic Way. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333013509_K_to_12_Assessment_The_Periodic_Way
  43. Mark Anthony Llego. (2019). Deped Guidelines on Classroom Assessment. https://www.teacherph.com/classroom-assessment/
  44. Marie Barnard. (2020). development of a competency model and tailored assessment method for high school science teachers utilizing a flipped learning   approached. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962910/
  45. Michael R. Fisher Jr. (2021). Student Assessment in Teaching and Learning. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/student-assessment-in-teaching-and-learning/
  46. Mu-hsuan Chou. (2013). Teacher Interpretation of Test Scores and Feedback to student in EFL Classrooms: A comparison of Two Rating methods. Higher Education Studies, Volume 3, No.     2. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1080198.pdf
  47. Najma Abdulla. (2019). Effectiveness of Assessment for Learning: Teachers Perception. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336408812_Effectiveness_of_Assessment_for_Learning_Teachers_Perception
  48. Osmani, Mohamad., Weerakkody., Vishanth Hindi, Nitham M., Al-Esmail., Eldabi Tillal., Kappoor Kawaljeet & Irani Zahir. (2015). Indentifying the trends and impact of graduate attributes on employability: a literature review. Tertiary Education  and  Management.  Volume  21,  n4  pages  367-379. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=attributes+literature&id=EJ1085234
  49. Osmani Mohammad., Weerakkody Vishanth Hindi & Eldabi Tillai. (2019). Graduates Employability Skills: A Review of literature against market demand. Journal of Education for Business. Volume 94, n7 pages 423-432. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=attributes+characteristics+literature&id=EJ1230872
  50. Patrick Rodrigue Belibe Enama. (2021). Student Teachers’ Competence in Lesson Planning During Microteaching. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, Volume 10, No. 3. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1918599
  51. Poyraz, Cengiz. (2013). Investigating Distance Education Students’ Study Skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. Volume 14, n4 pages 69-82. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=FUNCTIONALITY+IN+EXAM+LITERATURE&ft=on&ff1=dtySince_2013&ff2=eduSecondary+Education&pg=2&id=EJ1042571
  52. Raaheim, A., Mathiassen, K., Moen, V., Lona, I., Gynnid., & Bunaes, BR., (2018). European Journal of Higher Education. Digital Assessment-How does it Challenge Local Practices and National Law? A Norwegian Case Study Volume 9, Issue 2. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21568235.2018.1541420
  53. Rachel Harrison., Derek Flood., & David Duce. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal  of  Interaction  Science.  Volume 1, Article Number 1. https://journalofinteractionscience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2194-0827-1-1
  54. Reva A. Cury., and Naydeen T. Gonzalez-De Jesus. (2010). A Literature Review of Assessment: What New Sonographic Faculty Should Know. Volume 26, Issue 2. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/8756479310361374
  55. Richard J., Shavelson., Robert L. Linn., Eva L. Baker., Helen F.Ladd., Linda Darling-Hammond., Lorrie A. Shepard., Paul E. Barton., Edward Haertel, Diane Ravitch and Richard Rothstein. (2010). Problems with the use of student test score to evaluate teachers. https://www.epi.org/publication/bp278/
  56. Rotas, E E., & Cahapay, M B., (2020). Asian Journal of Distance Education. Difficulties in Remote Learning: Voices of Philippines University Students in the Wake of COVID-19 Crisis Volume 15, Issue 2. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1285295.pdf
  57. Sasan Baleghizadeh and Zahra Zarghami. (2014). Student-generated tests and their impact on EFL students’ learning of grammar. Journal of theory and Practice in Education. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/63412
  58. Simendinger Earl., El-Kassar., Abdul-Nasser., Gonzalez-Perez., Maria Alejandra., Crawford John., Thomason Stephanie., Reynet Philippe., Kjellander Bjorn., & Edwards Judson. (2017). Teaching Effectiveness Attributes in Business Schools. International Journal of Education Management. Volume 31, pages 780-800. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=attributes+characteristics+literature&id=EJ1151535
  59. Sulaiman Tajularipin., Rahim Suzieieez., Syrene Abdul., Wong Kaiyan., Jaafar Wan and Marzuki Wan. (2021). The use of “scratch and challenge board” as an alternative assessment tool to enhance university students skills. Asian  Journal  of  University  Education,  Volume  17  n3  p85-98. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Accuracy+in+assessment+tool+related+literature+and+studies&ft=on&pg=3&id=EJ1309462
  60. Susilo Dwi Rahayu, Sukoco (2020). Improving Teachers’ Competence in Information Technology. Proceeding of the International Conference on Educational Psychology and Pedagogy-“Diversity in Education. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icepp-19/125933675
  61. Stankiewicz Katarzyna., Tomaczak, Michal T., Ziemanianski, Pawel & Krawczyk- Brylka Beata. (2020). The structure of entpreneurial team members’ competencies: between effectuation and causation. Education Sciences. Volume 10, Article 337. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=entrepreneurial+competency+characteristics+literature&ft=on&id=EJ1277054
  62. Stephen M. Paton (2018). JALT Journal, The Language Teacher. Zipgrade: Scan Response Forms with your Phone Issue 42:6. https://jalt-publications.org/articles/24969-zipgrade-scan-response-forms-your-phone
  63. Suhendar (2020). International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. The effectiveness of the Zipgrade-Assisted Learning Outcomes Assessment Analysis in Promoting Indonesian Vocational Teachers’ Competence. Volume        11, Issue 5. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol11iss5/11543_Suhendar_2020_E_R.pdf
  64. Siti Salwa Sawari. (2013). Teacher Competency Assessment in the Classroom: Current Issues.
  65. Toom, Auli., Pyhalto, Kirsi., Pietarinen, Janne & Soini Tiina. (2021). Professional Agency for learning as a key for developing teachers’ competencies? Education Sciences. Volume 11, Article 324. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=entrepreneurial+competency+characteristics+literature&ft=on&id=EJ1304120
  66. Tzu-Yu Lin., Pei-Ju Liao., Ming-Kuo Ting & Kuang-Hung Hsu. (2018). Lifestyle characteristics as moderators of the effectiveness of weight control interventions among semiconductor workers. Biomedical Journal. Volume 41, Issue 6, pages 376-384. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2319417018302701
  67. Wiyasa Putu Irmayati., Laksana., I Ketut Darma., Indrawati and Ni Luh Ketut. (2019). Evaluating Quality of Teacher-Developed English Test in Vocational High School: Content Validity and Item Analysis. Journal of Education in Education Quarterly Reviews, Volume 2, No. 2. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1282306.pdf
  68. Vercellott, Marylou. (2021). Beyond the rubric: classroom assessment tools and assessment            practice. TESL-EJ, Volume 25 n3. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Accuracy+in+assessment+tool+related+literature+and+studies&ft=on&pg=3&id=EJ1332208
  69. Veronica Basilotta Gomez Pablos., Maria Matarranz., Luis Alberto Casado Aranda and Anna Otto. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology  in  Higher  Education  Volume  19,  Article  Number 8. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
  70. Zorluoglu., Seraceddin Levent., Bagriyanik., Kubra Elif and Sahinturuk Ayse. (2019). Analyze of the Science and Technology Course TEOG Questions Based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy and Their Relation between the Learning Outcomes of the Curriculum. International Journal of Progressive Education, Volume 15 n2, p104-117. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Unit+Test+Learning+Outcomes+Related+Literature&ft=on&pg=4&id=EJ1219296.
  71. Zhumash Zhanara., Xhumabaeva Aziya., Nurgallyeva Saniya., Saduakas Gulbanu., Lebedeva., Larissa Anatilevna., Zhoraeva and Saule Bazarbaevna. (2021). Professional Teaching Competence in Preservice Primary School Teachers: Structure, Criteria and Levels. World Journal on Educational Technology, Current Issues, Volume 13, n2, p261- 271. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Teacher+competence+on+planning+teaching+related+literature+and+studies&id=EJ1299493

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic