HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 12 no. 5 (2023)

Epistemological, Psychological, and Pedagogical Sources of Difficulties of Senior High School Students on Problem-Solving Tasks in General Mathematics: Basis for Teaching Guide Recommendations

Gerome Bautista | Analyn Guevara | Rowena Rivera

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

One of the major aims of mathematics education in the Philippines and abroad is to train students on how to solve problems inside the mathematics classroom and in the real world. However, learners encounter difficulties in problem-solving, and the sources of these difficulties are rarely studied. This study then aimed to surface the sources of difficulties of senior high school students of Saint Mary’s University on problem-solving tasks in General Mathematics by using a quantitative–qualitative approach in describing the sources of difficulties of senior high school students in completing mathematical tasks of problem solving, exploring epistemological, psychological and pedagogical causes that could affect their success in mathematics. It was found out that the Grade 11 students experience difficulty mainly because they perceive mathematics in general with too many calculations, there is a need for them to visualize problems using figures or equations, and there is little time given to solve a given problem. Overall, epistemological sources were found to have a significantly greater cause of difficulty than psychological and pedagogical sources. It was then recommended that the teaching guide for General Mathematics build on students’ self-confidence in the nature of the subject by providing problems with a gradual increase of difficulty for students’ sense of achievement.



References:

  1. Barbu, O. (2010). Effects of Linguistics Complexity and Math Difficulty on Word Problem Solving by English Learners. International Journal of Education, 2(2), 1 – 19.
  2. Bingolbali, E., Akkoç, H., Ozmantar, M. F., & Demir, S. (2011). Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers‟ Views of the Sources of Students‟ Mathematical Difficul-ties. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education6(1), 40-59.
  3. Dannawi, D. M. (2013). A Study on Effect of Problem solving on student's achievement (Doctoral dissertation, The British University in Dubai (BUiD)). Retrieved from https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/415
  4. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. In Elliott, S. N., Kurz, A., Beddow, P., & Frey, J. (2009, February). Cognitive load theory: Instruction-based research with applications for designing tests. In Proceedings of the National Association of School Psychologists' Annual Convention, Boston, MA, February (Vol. 24, pp. 1-22).
  5. Lester, F. K., & Kehle, P. E. (2003). From problem solving to modeling: The evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching, 501-518.
  6. Lising, L., & Elby, A. (2004). The impact of epistemology on learning: A case study from introductory physics. arXiv preprint physics/0411007.
  7. Newcombe, N. S., Ambady, N., Eccles, J., Gomez, L., Klahr, D., Linn, M., ... & Mix, K. (2009). Psychology’s role in mathematics and science education. American Psychologist64(6), 538.
  8. Novriani, M., & Surya, E. (2017). Analysis of Student Difficulties in Mathematics Problem Solving Ability at MTs SWASTA IRA Medan. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)(2017)33(3), 63-75.
  9. Phonapichat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An analysis of elementary school students’ difficulties in mathematical problem solving. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences116, 3169-3174.
  10. Rivas, S. A. (2016). Implementing Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Math Classes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston-Downtown). Retrieved from http://cms.uhd.edu/faculty/redlt/rivasseniorproject.pdf
  11. Southwell, B., White, A. L., Way, J., & Perry, B. (2006). Attitudes versus achievement in pre-service mathematics teaching. In Refereed Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference.
  12. Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences8, 142-151.
  13. Viholainen, A., Asikainen, M., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2014). Mathematics student teachers’ epistemological beliefs about the nature of mathematics and the goals of mathematics teaching and learning in the beginning of their studies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education10(2), 159-171.
  14. Whitney, E. L. (2017). Math handbook of formulas, processes and tricks. Retrieved from http://mathguy.us/Handbooks/PreAlgebraHandbook.pdf
  15. Yasin, S., & Enver, T. (2007). Students′ Difficulties with Application of Definite Integration. Educatia Matematica3(1-2), 15-27. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Enver_Tatar/publication/242685561_StudentsDifficulties_with_Application_of_Definite_Integration_1/links/54ed455f0cf2465f5330ec6d/StudentsDifficulties-with-Application-of-Definite-Integration-1.pdf
  16. Yeo, K. K. J. (2009). Secondary 2 Students' Difficulties in Solving Non-Routine Problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning.
  17. Young-Loveridge, J., Taylor, M., Sharma, S., & Hāwera, N. (2006). Students' perspectives on the nature of mathematics. In Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated. Conference (Grootenboer, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Chinnappan, M. (2005). Identities Cultures and Learning Spaces: Proceedings of the 29 Th Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne, 1-5 July, 2006. MERGA.b