Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 2 no. 3 (2024)

Persuasion in the Business Speeches of Chief Executive Officers of Selected International Companies

Su Yingying | Leonardo O Munalim

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the persuasive strategies employed in the business speeches of Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of selected international companies. Anchored in Speech Act Theory within the broader aspect of pragmatics, it analyzed 12 speeches, totalling 14,938 words, from a diverse range of international CEOs. These speeches, intended for both employees and shareholders, provided a rich corpus for examining the nuances of persuasion in a business context. The analysis focused on identifying various categories of persuasion, particularly distinguishing between direct and indirect speech acts. Utilizing a qualitative approach, 1,172 clauses were coded to elucidate the persuasive mechanisms at play. Findings revealed a predominant use of indirect persuasion by CEOs. Despite their intention to persuade, these business leaders predominantly opted for subtle, indirect speech acts, making their persuasive intent both non-obvious and inherent. Contrary to expectations, the study found a marked absence of direct rhetorical devices such as rhetorical questions, suppositions, and wonderings. This aligned with the pragmatic realities of business communication, which often eschews overtly unrealistic assertions. The analysis proposed a novel model for understanding the linguistic strategies of persuasive speech in business, highlighting both utilized and potential areas of persuasive speech acts. The implications of these findings extended beyond the specific speeches analyzed, suggesting avenues for further research. Recommendations included exploring persuasion directed at varied audiences, analyzing the perlocutionary effects post-delivery, and integrating paralinguistic and extralinguistic elements with verbal aspects of business speeches. This research not only mapped the current landscape of persuasive strategies in CEO speeches but also opened new possibilities for linguistic exploration in the realm of corporate communication.



References:

  1. AlAfnan, M.A., & Oshchepkova, T. (2022). A speech act analysis of the United Nations Secretary General's opening remarks to the General Assembly emergency special session on Ukraine. Studies in Media and Communication, 10(2), 91-98.
  2. Alkaraan, F., Albahloul, M., & Hussainey, K. (2023). Carillion's strategic choices and the boardroom's strategies of persuasive appeals: Ethos, logos, and pathos. Journal of Applied Accounting Research.
  3. Al-Hindawi, F., & Kamil, S. I. (2017). The pragmatic nature of manipulation. Kufa Journal of Arts, 1(33), 9–54.
  4. Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.
  5. Baron, M. (2003). Manipulativeness, proceeding, and addresses. American Philosophical Association, 77(2), 37-54.
  6. Baron, R. A., & Markman, G. D. (2000). Beyond social capital: How social skills can enhance entrepreneurs’ success. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 106–116.
  7. Blass, R. (2006). Manipulation in the speeches and writings of Hitler and the NSDAP from a relevance theoretic point of view. Cornel Sen.
  8. Burikova, S., Kuznetsova, M., & Ovchinnikova, E. (2020). Peculiarities of business presentation communicative means. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(5), 311-320.
  9. Craig, R., & Amernic, J. (2018). Are there language markers of hubris in CEO letters to shareholders? Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 973-986.
  10. Cyphert, D. (2010). The rhetorical analysis of business speech: Unresolved questions. Journal of Business Communication, 47(3), 346-368.
  11. Danler, P. (2005). Morpho-syntactic and textual realizations as deliberate pragmatic argumentative linguistic tools. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  12. Dhooge, L. J. (2014). The first amendment, compelled speech, and disclosure regulations. In R.C. Bird, D.R. Cahoy & J.D. Prenkert (Eds.), Law, Business, and Human Rights: Bridging the Gap (pp. 94-117). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  13. Diegoli, E. (2022). The speech act of apologizing in Japanese online communication. East Asian Pragmatics, 7, 123-141.
  14. Fadhilla, P. A. N., & Basari, A. (2022). Translation techniques of directive speech acts of the characters used in the Cruella movie. In UNCLLE (Undergraduate Conference on Language, Literature, and Culture, 2(1), 217-223).
  15. Fiqih, E.A., & Sudana, D. (2022). The speech acts of consumers' complaining and sellers' responses on the review page of the e-commerce platforms. AMCA Journal of Science and Technology, 2(1), 14-17.
  16. Goodin, R.E. (1980). Manipulatory Politics. Yale University Press.
  17. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J.I. Morgan (Eds.), Speech Acts. New York Academic Press.
  18. Grice, H.P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.
  19. Hakimova, Z. T. (2021). The analysis of metaphors and metonymies in political speeches. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, 10(12), 721-726.
  20. Hess. J.A, & Pearson, J.C. (1992). Basic public speaking principles: An examination of twelve popular texts. Basic Communication Course Annual, 4(6).
  21. Jacobs, S. (1996). Language and Interpersonal Communication. Harvard University Press.
  22. Jasim, R. M., & Mustafa, S.S. (2020). A semantic and rhetorical study of manipulation in two English and Arabic political speeches. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 426-444.
  23. Jibreen, M.& AL-Janabi, H. (2018). The relationship between persuasion and speech act theory. Journal of Al-Qadisiya in Arts and Educational Sciences, 18(3), 29-37.
  24. Kadri, H.K.B. (2022). Speech acts of written texts in fast food online advertisements. e-Jurnal Bahasa dan Linguistik (e-JBL), 4(1), 100-109.
  25. Keraf, G. (2007). Argumentasi dan Narasi Komposisi Lanjutan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  26. Kopus, T. L., & Kolimova, I.I. (2020). Reimagine pitch as a speech genre in business communication. Perm University Herald: Russian & Foreign Philology, 12(3), 31-40.
  27. Krishnan, I.A., Mello, G. D., Nalini Arumugam, P. C. S., Paramasivam, S., & Ibrahim, M.N.A. (2021). A comparative study of speech acts between Malaysia and Singapore on the first MCO announcements of Covid-19. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(8), 992-1008.
  28. Kupor, D., & Tormala, Z. (2018). When moderation fosters persuasion: The persuasive power of deviatory reviews. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 490-510.
  29. Kurniawan, I., Thahar, H. E., & Asri, Y. (2020). Events of persuasive speech in the interview of Sandiaga Uno. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education, 485, 73-77.
  30. Larson, C.U. (2013). Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility (13th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  31. Larson，C. E. (1963). A selected source file on speech communication in Business and Industry. University of Kansas.
  32. Lee, S. (2019). Integrating rhetorical criticism into business communication as an interdisciplinary approach. Business Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 5-12.
  33. Leon, M. (2023). Persuasive speeches. Public Speaking as Performance. https://opentext.ku.edu/publicspeakingperformance/chapter/persuasive-speeches/](https://opentext.ku.edu/publicspeakingperformance/chapter/persuasive-speeches/)
  34. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Lihua, L. (2022). Discourse and manipulation: Stories about China in the New York Times. In Communicating with the World (pp. 154-167). Routledge.
  36. Liu, C., Chen, S., & Shao, Q. (2019). Do CEO rhetorical strategies affect corporate social performance? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 11(18), 4907.
  37. Lucas, S. E. (2004). The Art of Public Speaking. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  38. Manca, S., Altoè, G., Schultz, P.W., & Fornara, F. (2020). The persuasive route to sustainable mobility: Elaboration likelihood model and emotions predict implicit attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 52(8), 830-860.
  39. Nasser, M.A. (2022). A corpus-based study of reviewers’ usage of speech acts. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1), 2125155.
  40. Novitasari, M. A., & Dewi, F.A.I. (2023). Directive speech act used by teacher at the seventh grade of MTS N 3 Sukoharjo year 2022/2023 (Doctoral dissertation, Uin Raden Mas Said).
  41. Oparinde, K., Rapeane-Mathonsi, M., & Mheta, G. (2021). Exploring manipulative rhetorical choices in Nigerian political speeches. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1864913.
  42. Osman, A. (1987). Pragmatic markers of persuasion. In Hawthorn, J. (Ed.), Propaganda, Persuasion and Polemic (pp. 91-106). Edward Arnold.
  43. Polyakova, L.S., Yuzhakova, Y.V., Zalavina, T.Y., & Dyorina, N.V. (2020). Linguistic manipulation means in English political discourse. Amazonia Investiga, 9(33), 27-36.
  44. Porter, J. A. (2022). The drama of speech acts: Shakespeare's Lancastrian tetralogy. University of California Press.
  45. Rahmawati, Y. R. (2022). Speech acts of teacher’s utterance in English classroom interactions. In International Conference on Islam, Law, And Society (Incoils), 2(1).
  46. Said, N.K.M. (2018). Investigating persuasive strategies in business English. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 1(22), 773–790.
  47. Searle J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
  48. Searle, J., Kiefer, R. & Bierwisch, M. (1980). Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics (Vol.10). Reidel Publication.
  49. Searle, J.R. (1997). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
  50. Searle, J.R., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press.
  51. Seda, G., & Rafayel, H. (2021). Manipulative speech: A theoretical overview. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 17(2 (24)), 11-26.
  52. Tarasov, E. (1990). Speech manipulation: Methodology and theory, optimization of speech influence. Moscow University Press.
  53. Thanh, N. T. T. (2022). Assertive speech acts of persuasion in English presidential election speeches. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 30, 666.
  54. Thro, A. B. (2009). CEOs’ hybrid speeches: Business communication staples. The Journal of Business Communication, 46(3), 335-361.
  55. Wang, X., & Liu, S-J. (2021). A study of linguistic features of business English speeches. China ESP Studies, 23, 60-67.
  56. Ware, A. (1981). The concept of manipulation: Its relation to democracy and power. Cambridge University Press.
  57. Wood, G. (2023). English Grammar: All-in-One. John Wiley and Sons.
  58. Yue, C. A., Thelen, P., Robinson, K., & Men, L. R. (2019). How do CEOs communicate on Twitter? A comparative study between Fortune 200 companies and top startup companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(3), 532-552.
  59. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics: Introduction to Language Study. Oxford University Press.
  60. Zimmerman, G.I., Owen, J., & Seibert, D.R. (1986). Speech Communication: A Contemporary Introduction. West Publications.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic