Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 15 no. 7 (2023)

Evaluating the Scientific Literacy Skills of Undergraduate Biology Students

Arantxa Loise Lu-ong

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Scientific literacy skills are one of the vital components needed by 21st-century workers, particularly in STEM-related careers. So, this descriptive-comparative study evaluated the level of scientific literacy skills of undergraduate biology students by utilizing the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) tool, a 28-item multiple choice exam. Based on the findings, students struggled to apply their knowledge of recognizing a sound scientific argument, comprehending the components of a research design, and how they affect scientific results and conclusions. Concurrently, the learners also had a moderate and high level of scientific literacy for the first and second TOSLS categories, respectively. And there was a significant difference in the TOSLS scores across areas of specialization. Therefore, teachers must implement learning activities that can fulfill the demands of 21st-century learning, such as student-centered learning, collaborative learning, and technology and computer-integrated learning, to increase students' critical thinking skills, a vital component of scientific literacy.



References:

  1. Adnan, Mulbar, U., Sugiarti, & Bahri, A. (2021). Scientific literacy skills of students: problem ofiology teaching in junior high school in south Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal ofInstruction, 14(3), 847-860. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14349a
  2. Ahmada, R.F., Suwono, H., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2021). Development scientific literacy through stemproject in biology classroom: a mixed method analysis. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043260
  3. Aina, J.K., Opeyemi, A.A., & Olu, A.M. (2020). Assessment of scientific literacy skills of college ofeducation students in Nigeria. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities,5(1), 207-220. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4361046
  4. Anggraeni, C., Permanasari, A., & Heliawati, L. (2022). Students' scientific literacy in chemistry learning through collaborative techniques as a pillar of 21st-century skills. Journal of Innovationin Educational and Cultural Research, 3(3), 457-462. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.162
  5. Ariska & Rosana, D. (2020). Analysis of junior high school scientific literacy skills: domain competenceon vibrations, waves and sound materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012094
  6. Arjunaidi, A.J., & Azid, N. (2022). The implementation of an inductive model on science students'critical thinking skills during online learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(9), 858-865. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.9.1694
  7. Ashbrook, P. (2020). Becoming Scientifically Literate. National Science Teaching Association. https://www.nsta.org/science-and-children/science-and-children-aprilmay-2020/becoming-scientifically-literate#
  8. Cajimat, R., & Tabaquero, A. (2015). Fundamental and derived scientific literacy of students in the k-12curriculum and revised basic education curriculum. Mentor's Research Digest, 1(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32150082
  9. Çil, E., & Kar, H. (2015). Pre-service science teachers' interpretations of graphs: a cross-sectional study.Science Educator, 24(1), 36-44. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1069988
  10. Čipková, E., Karolčík, S., & Scholzová, L. (2020). Are secondary school graduates prepared for thestudies of natural sciences? – evaluation and analysis of the result of scientific literacy levelsachieved by secondary school graduates. Research in Science and Technological Education,38(2), 146-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1599846
  11. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  12. Farcis, F., Suyatno, & Widodo, W. (2019). The effectiveness of MCTS learning model to improvecritical thinking skills and disposition. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v8n2.p1713-1721
  13. Glazer, N. (2011). Challenges with graph interpretation: a review of the literature. Studies in ScienceEducation, 47(2), 183-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.60530
  14. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS):
  15. Measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and arguments. Cell BiologyEducation, 11(4), 364-377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
  16. Hidayati, Y., & Sinaga, P. (2019). The profile of critical thinking skills students on sciencelearning.Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(4). https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/4/044075
  17. Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientificliteracy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
  18. Khairati, K., Artika, W., Sarong, M., Abdullah, A., & Hasanuddin, H. (2021). Implementation ofSTEM-based experiential learning to improve critical thinking skills on ecosystem materials.Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 752-757. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.850
  19. Mahardini, T., Khaerunisa, F., Wijayanti, I. W., & Salimi, M. (2018). Research-based learning (RBL) toimprove critical thinking skills. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs):Conference Series, 1(2), 466-473. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v1i2.26816
  20. Masadeh, T. S. (2021). The effectiveness of flipped classroom on the academic achievement ofuniversity undergraduates. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v5i2.57290
  21. Mercado, C. (2018). Measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and argumentsusing scientific literacy skills (SLS). Southeast Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 3(1),110-114. https://sajst.org/online/index.php/sajst/article/view/126
  22. Montebon, D. R. (2014). K12 science program in the Philippines: Student perception on itsimplementation. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280234350
  23. Mukti, W. R., Yuliskurniawati, I. D., Noviyanti, N. I., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019). A survey ofhigh school students' scientific literacy skills in different gender. Journal of Physics: ConferenceSeries, 1241. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012043
  24. Narmaditya, B. S., Wulandari, D., & Sakarji, S. R. B. (2018). Does problem-based learning improvecritical thinking skill?. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.21548
  25. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards: An overview. National Science Education Standards. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4962
  26. Novaristiana, R. N., Rinanto, Y., & Ramli, M. (2019). Scientific literacy profile in biological science ofhigh school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7080
  27. Nurhairani, Rozi, F., & Prawijaya, S. (2019). The development of problem-based learning model withscientific literacy approach in elementary school. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 208. https://doi.org/10.2991/icssis-18.2019.46
  28. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2014). PISA 2012 results: Whatstudents know and can do – Student performance in mathematics, reading and science.Programme for International Student Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en
  29. Palines, K. M. E., & Ortega-Dela Cruz, R. A. (2021). Facilitating factors of scientific literacy skillsdevelopment among junior high school students. LUMAT: International Journal on Math,Science, and Technology Education, 9(1), 546–569. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1520
  30. PISA 2018 National Report of the Philippines. (2019). In DepEd. Department of Education. RetrieveSeptember 19, 2022, from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA-2018-Philippine-National-Report.pdf
  31. Prastika, M. D., Wati, M., & Suyidno, S. (2019). The effectiveness of problem-based learning inimproving students' scientific literacy skills and scientific attitudes. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan
  32. Fisika, 7(3), 185-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v7i3.7027Prihadi, Murtono, & Setiadi, G. (2021). Effectiveness of blended learning to improve critical thinkingskills and student science learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1823. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012095
  33. Purwani, L. D., Sudargo, F., & Surakusumah, W. (2018). Analysis of students' scientific literacy skillsthrough socio-scientific issue's test on biodiversity topics. Journal of Physics: ConferenceSeries, 1013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012019
  34. Qutob, H. (2022). Effect of flipped classroom approach in the teaching of a hematology course. PLoSONE, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267096
  35. Razak, A. A., Mahjom, N., Ramdan, M. R., Mahjom, N., Zabit, M. N. M., Muhammad, F., Hussin, M. Y. M., & Abdullah, N. L. (2022). Improving critical thinking skills in teaching through problem-based learning for students: A scoping review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching andEducational Research, 21(2), 342-362. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.2.19
  36. Roohr, K. C., Graf, E. A., & Liu, O. L. (2014). Assessing quantitative literacy in higher education: Anoverview of existing research and assessments with recommendations for next-generationassessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12024
  37. Sezer, T. S., & Esenay, F. I. (2022). Impact of flipped classroom approach on undergraduate nursingstudent's critical thinking skills. Journal of Professional Nursing, 42, 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.002
  38. Shaffer, J., Ferguson, J., & Denaro, K. (2019). Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills reveals thatfundamental literacy is an important contributor to scientific literacy. CBE—Life SciencesEducation, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0238
  39. Sholahuddin, A., Susilowati, E., Prahani, B. K., & Erman, E. (2021). Using a cognitive style-basedlearning strategy to improve students' environmental knowledge and scientific literacy.International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 791-808. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14445a
  40. Sholikah, L., & Pertiwi, F. N. (2021). Analysis of science literacy ability of junior high school studentsbased on Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). INSECTA: IntegrativeScience Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 2(1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v2i1.2922
  41. Sunandar, A., Srihanaty, S., & Rahayu, H. M. (2022). Scientific literacy skills of state high schoolstudents in Singkawang city. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 767-772. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1350
  42. Sutiani, A., Situmorang, M., & Silalahi, A. (2021). Implementation of an inquiry learning model withscience literacy to improve student critical thinking skills. International Journal ofInstruction,14(2), 117-138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1428a
  43. Suwono, H., Adi, W. C., & Suarsini, E. (2019). Guided inquiry-blended learning (GI-BL) to enhancethe critical thinking skill of undergraduate biology students. AIP Conference Proceedings,2081(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5094017
  44. Tairab, H., & Khalaf Al-Naqbi, A. (2010). How do secondary school science studentsinterpret and construct scientific graphs?. Journal of Biological Education, 38(3), 127-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655920
  45. Wafa, Z., & Jatmiko, B. (2022). Learning physics with a free discovery model to improve criticalthinking skills of high school students. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran
  46. Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(3), 637-646. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5375Widayoko, A., Femilia, P. S., Lesmono, A. D., Sudjatmi, H., Prastiwi, V. D., & Munfarikha, N. (2019).
  47. Description of students' scientific literacy competencies on the scientific issue of flat earththeory. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.424a
  48. Wilkins, J. (2016). An assessment of the quantitative literacy of undergraduate students. TheJournal ofExperimental Education, 84(4), 639-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1111854
  49. Yanto, B. E., Subali, B., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Improving students' scientific reasoning skills throughthe three levels of inquiry. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4),689-704. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12444a.
  50. Zen, E. (2018). Science literacy and why it is important. Journal of Geological Education, 38(5), 463-464. https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-38.5.463

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic