HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 3 no. 9 (2022)

The Academic Performance of Grade 10 Mathematics Learners Exposed to HybridLearning and Printed Modular Distance Learning in San Andres District, Schools Division of Quezon

Renante Camay

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to analyze the academic performance of the Grade 10 Mathematics learners exposed to Hybrid Learning and Printed Modular Distance Learning Modality in San Andres District, Schools Division of Quezon during the School Year 2021-2022. To determine which of the following modalities seem effective in increasing the academic performance of the learners in mathematics, this employed a comparative quantitative research design covering the participation of 72 learners exposed to hybrid learning and 176 learners exposed to printed modular distance learning. The result of the pretest and posttest and the second quarterly grades, and the learning gains of the Grade 10 Mathematics learners exposed to hybrid learning and printed modular distance learning were analyzed to determine if there is a significant difference in the academic performance before and after the implementation of the mentioned modalities. Data gathered were analyzed using percentage and mean to evaluate the frequency distributions of the academic performance and learning gains, as well as T-test for dependent and independent variables to find the significant difference of the academic performance, and learning gains of Grade 10 Mathematics learners exposed to hybrid learning and printed modular distance learning



References:

  1. Alba, C (2020), Education Program Supervisor In - Charge of Mathematics Division of Quezon, Google Meeting on the conduct of Numeracy Test 2021-2022_October 9, 2021: 1:30 pm
  2. Anzaldo G. (2021), Otto B, Kistner S. Is there a Matthew effect in self-regulated learning and mathematical strategy application? — Assessing the effects of a training program with standardized learning diaries. Learn Individ Differ. 2017; 55: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.005 retrieved 7.21.2021  
  3. Duffy, J. L., & McDonald, J. B. (2016). Teaching and learning with technology.  Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
  4. Farid, Ahmad, & Khattak, (2016). Adams, A., Randall, S., & Traustadóttir, T. (2013). A tale of two sections: An experiment to compare the effectiveness of a hybrid versus a traditional lecture format in introductory microbiology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(1), ar6-ar6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0118.retrieved: 9.17.2021
  5. Galapon O. (2017) Comparative Analysis on the Effectiveness of Using Quipper School in the Performance of Students in Science 7. Rizal Technological University Mandaluyong, Philippines.
  6. Garcia (2017) Factors associated with academic time use and academic performance of college students: a recursive approach. J Coll Stud Dev. 2017; 41: 544–556.
  7. Guspatni, M. (2018). Students’ activities in, perceptions of and expectations for e-learning: A case in Indonesia. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 10(1), 97–112.
  8. Isbell, D. et al. l. (2017). Narrative perspectives on self-directed foreign language learning in a computer-and mobile-assisted language learning context. Languages, 2(2): 4
  9. Karki (2017). Effects of collaborative m-learning and individual e-learning on the academic performance, attention benefit and consistency of learning. The Online Journal of Distance Education and Eā€Learning, 5(1), 35–46.
  10. Miller & Cuevas, 2017; Alioon & Delialioglu, (2015). Maksimenkova, O. V., & Neznanov, O. A (2012). Collaborative technologies in education: how to build effective support for hybrid learning. University management: Practice and analysis, 23(1-2), 101 – 110.
  11. Valk, Rashid, & Elder, (2016).  Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2010). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52-65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003.retrieved: 8.24.2021