Home⇛International Journal of Academic and Practical Research⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2024)

Responsive Planning, Responsive Engagement, and Responsive Implementation: Principles as an Approach to Strategic Planning in Education

Rosette C. Pamolino | June Patrick V. Pedrezuela | Salve F. Romero | Rolan B. Sablahon | Almighty C. Tabuena | Judy V. Tejano

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Strategic planning in education is guided by three key principles: Responsive Planning, Responsive Engagement, and Responsive Implementation. Responsive Planning emphasizes proactive and adaptive processes to address dynamic needs. Responsive Engagement actively involves stakeholders to gather diverse perspectives and foster ownership of the plan. Responsive Implementation focuses on agile execution, allowing for flexibility based on ongoing evaluation. The planning process begins with a thorough assessment of the institution's current state, followed by vision and mission development, goal setting, and environmental analysis. Stakeholder engagement is crucial throughout, ensuring diverse perspectives are considered. Transparent communication fosters collaboration and trust. Recommendations for effective planning include regular reviews, transparent communication channels, and a dedicated task force for monitoring changes. Stakeholder engagement is paramount, as it fosters participation and support. Responsive implementation ensures goals are achieved effectively, with a focus on agile execution, resource allocation, and risk management. Integrating these principles fosters positive change for students, educators, and the community.



References:

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (2010). Planning for uncertainty: Living in the real world. World Scientific Publishing.
  2. Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement (5th ed.). Wiley.
  3. Education Elements (2024). The Ultimate Guide for Responsive Strategic Planning. Education Elements. https://www.edelements.com/responsive-strategic-planning?fbclid=IwAR3iJy8yOr789pU1yCz2jzQXhU3r01TRLO4E_lYn79pEpP5Bi0_V-h9tdXM
  4. Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  5. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2005). The office of strategy management. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 72-80.
  6. Kotter, J. P., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2008). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 86(7-8), 130-139.
  7. Langley, G. J., Moen, R. D., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (2009). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  8. National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). Strategic planning in education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2020475
  9. National School Public Relations Association (NSPRA). (2018). Community engagement in school turnaround: The role of the district office. https://cdn-files.nspra.org/docs/default-source/advocacy-downloads/community-engagement-in-school-turnaround.pdf?sfvrsn=2
  10. Pearce, J. A., & Robinson, R. B. (2019). Strategic management: Planning for domestic & global competition (15th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  11. Reed, J. (2009). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431.
  12. Schoemaker, P. J. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25-40.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic