HomeInternational Journal of Academic and Practical Researchvol. 3 no. 1 (2024)

Exploring the Lived Experiences of Seminarians: A Descriptive Exploratory Study on the Quintessential College Student Life

Mark Theo P. Binghay | Jose Andrei B. Sibal | Evan Taja-on

Discipline: humanities (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

Seminary life offers dedicated opportunities for study, meditation, and spiritual growth for individuals pursuing ministry. New seminary students develop in four areas: human, spiritual, academic, and pastoral. The study focuses on the human and academic formation of seminarians. The typical student life at seminary follows the usual routine of attending classes and completing coursework over a semester. The study addressed a knowledge gap, as few studies have covered seminarians' perceptions of college life. The study surveyed all thirty-one (31) college seminarians using total population sampling. A descriptive phenomenological research design was employed, utilizing a validated researcher-made questionnaire to gather relevant information about the perceptions and experiences of the seminarians regarding typical student life. Data were sorted into categories and summarized using thematic analysis. The study revealed that external pressures, community expectations, and seminary traditions shape seminarians' views on school activities. Seminarians viewed other students' academic experiences differently because they chose a rigorous program. Moreover, their strict schedules and spiritual practices leave seminarians with less time to socialize. However, seminarians felt they had a similar social life to other students because they could still socialize and interact with peers. Additionally, seminarians managed their time for academic success and seminary life balance by prioritizing vital activities, setting limitations, and practicing self-care. By identifying and adopting these strategies, seminarians can make informed decisions and develop time management skills, resulting in a more fulfilling and productive seminary experience.



References:

  1. Allen, K., Kern, M.L., Vella-Brodrick, D. et al. (2018). What Schools Need to Know About Fostering School Belonging: A Meta-analysis. Educ Psychol Rev, 30, 1–34.
  2. Aligan, R.E. (2015). Priestly Formation in the Asian Contexts: Application of the Church’s Teachings to the Philippine Church Society. Catholic Theology and Thought, 75: 173-209
  3. Basi, K. (1991) “The Quintessential College Student” The Angle: Vol. 1991: Iss. 1, Article 33.
  4. Best, J. & Kahn, J. (1998). Research in Education. The University of Michigan. Allyn and Bacon.
  5. Burns, R. (2016). Balancing Academic Work and Spiritual Life in Seminary. https://www.logos.com/grow/balancing-academic-work-and-spiritual-life-in-seminary/
  6. Cannata, S. (2018). A peek inside the life of a seminarian. Newman University News. https://news.newmanu.edu/seminarian-life/
  7. Carroll, M.C. (2022). Kevin’s Story: Integrating Seminary Formation. Reflective Practice: Formation and Supervision in Ministry, 42: 209-216.
  8. Chiroma, N. (2017). Mentoring and the Ministerial Formation of Seminary Students. Stellenbosch Theological Journal, 3(1):51-68.
  9. Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  10. Dontre, A. (2020). The Influence of Technology on Academic Distraction: A Review.  Human Behavior & Emergent Technology, 3:379-390.
  11. Garcia, R., Flakner, K., and Vivian, R. (2020). Systematic Literature Review: Self-Regulated Learning Strategies using E-Learning Tools for Computer Science. Computers & Education, 123:150-163.
  12. Gegajo, G. (2021). The Psychosocial Development of the Seminarians and the Positive affirmation Skills Intervention (PASI). Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 2(3): 1-17.
  13. Gubrium, J., Holstein, J., Marvasti, A., & McKinney, K. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. United States of America.
  14. Kaushar, M. (2013). Study of Impact of Time Management on Academic Performance of College Students. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 9(6): 59-60.
  15. Kiger, M.E. and Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8): 846-854.
  16. Lavrakas, P. (2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (1st Ed.). SAGE Publications. Laerd Dissertation, Lund Research Ltd. Total Population Sampling. http://dissertation.laerd.com/total-population-sampling.php
  17. May, K.E., Elder, A.D. (2018) Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 15, 13.
  18. McKoon, K. (2023). Inside an Average Day in the Life of a College Student. CollegeXpress. https://www.collegexpress.com/articles-and-advice/student-life/articles/living-campus/day-life-college-student/
  19. Oakley, D. (2017). Seminary Education and Formation: The Challenges and Some Ideas About Future Developments. International Studies in Catholic Education, 9(2): 223-235.
  20. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., and McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning (MSLQ). The University of Michigan.
  21. Ramli, N., Muljono, P., and Afendi, F. M. (2018). External Factors, Internal Factors and Self-Directed Learning Readiness. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 5(1), 37-42.
  22. Torregosa, M., Ynalvez, M.A., & Morin, K. (2016). Perception Matter: Faculty Caring, Campus Racial Climate, and Academic Performance. Journal of Advances Nursing, 72(4):864-877.
  23. Yin, R. (2014), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed., SAGE Publications.
  24. Zaccone, M.C. and Pedrini, M. (2019). The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on students learning effectiveness. Exploring the moderating role of gender. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(6):1381-1394