HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 2 no. 10 (2024)

Exploring Ecological Consciousness: An Ecocritical Analysis of Marjorie Evasco's Poetry through Commoner’s Ecological Laws

Eileen Joy D. Sarita

Discipline: English studies

 

Abstract:

This study critically examined the textuality of select poems by Marjorie Evasco using ecocriticism theory based on Commoner's (1991) ecological principles: Everything Is Connected, Everything Must Go Somewhere, and Nature Knows Best. The research aimed to depict Evasco's writings' ecological messages and themes by line-by-line coding. Data were sourced from Evasco's book "Dreamweavers" and various theoretical texts. Findings revealed that Evasco’s poems reflect Commoner's (1991) ecological laws, portraying them figuratively and literally. The analysis highlights themes such as nature as a teacher, nature’s intrinsic value, hope in nature, conflicts with modernization, and human impacts on nature. The study recommends further analysis of Evasco’s work through ecofeminism and suggests including her poems in literature classes to serve as a platform for environmental awareness. Future research should explore other works of Evasco and similar authors.



References:

  1. Baxter, S., & Bruce, F. (2008). Steps to an ecology of product innovation. In DS 46: Proceedings of E&PDE 2008, the 10th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Barcelona, Spain, 353-358.
  2. Bricker, W. (2009). Ten commandments for the environment. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/g0mvno
  3. Button, J. (1989). How to be green.
  4. Commoner, B. (1991). Rapid population growth and environmental stress. International Journal of Health Services, 21(2), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.2190/B8RU-HA91-JJKW-PKUR
  5. Commoner, B. (2015). Poverty of power: Energy and the economic crisis. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
  6. Coupe, L. (2000). The Green Studies Reader: From Romanticism to Ecocriticism. Routledge & CRC Press.
  7. Frey, L., Botan, C., & Kreps, G. (1999). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  8. Foster, J. (2005). The vulnerable planet. Cornerstone Books.
  9. Gallo, K. (2014). Nature and humanity as source of life, living and everyday transformation.
  10. Johnson, A. (n.d.). A eulogy for Commoner (1991).
  11. Kao, W. F., Kuo, C. C., Hsu, T. F., Chang, H., Sung, Y. Y., Yen, D. H., Wu, J. K., & Lee, C. H. (2002). Acute mountain sickness in Jade Mountain climbers of Taiwan. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 73(4), 359–362.
  12. Lee, E. (n.d.). Human impact on ecosystems review (article). Retrieved from https://rb.gy/afbtg5
  13. Love, G. (2003). Practical Ecocriticism: Literature, Biology, and the Environment. University of Virginia Press.
  14. Markowitz, S. (2018). Barry Commoner and the current environmental crisis. American Journal of Public Health, 108(S2), S53. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304411
  15. Naess, A. (1984). A defence of the deep ecology movement. Environmental Ethics, 6(3), 265-270. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19846330
  16. Prowse, Y. (2015). Finding hope in earth. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/v1qk77
  17. Rueckert, W. (1996). Literature and ecology: An experiment in ecocriticism. Environment & Society Portal, 105-123.
  18. Stikker A. (2018b, April 14). Water, the blood of the earth. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/9ki3cs
  19. Watson, R. (1983). A critique of anti-anthropocentric biocentrism. Environmental Ethics, 5(3), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19835325