Home⇛Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development⇛vol. 12 no. 2 Part 5 (2024)

Internationalization Strategies, Quality, and Student Satisfaction in Chinese Universities

Wang Hao

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the relationship between internationalization strategies and student satisfaction in Chinese universities, focusing on both local and international students. The study used a descriptive research design and used 426 students from three schools in Shanghai, China. The research highlighted the importance of quality in planning, assurance, and control as essential elements that impact strategy formulation, implementation, evaluation, and modification. With globalization shaping educational practices, the findings suggested that tailored strategies based on demographic factors such as gender and nationality can enhance student satisfaction. The study also underscored the necessity of continuous improvement in internationalization processes to meet evolving student needs and maintain educational standards. Significant correlations were found between the quality of internalization efforts and satisfaction levels, indicating that robust strategic frameworks are crucial for fostering student engagement and achieving institutional success. There were significant differences in satisfaction between sex, age, and nationality, and a significant relationship between internationalization strategy, quality, and student satisfaction. Based on the results of the study, an enhanced internationalization plan was proposed.



References:

  1. Liu, H., & Metcalfe, A. S. (2016). Internationalizing Chinese higher education: A glonacal analysis of local layers and conditions. Higher Education. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-015-9912-8
  2. Appiah, E.  K., Gabrielsson, P., & Criado, A. R. (2024). The role of digitalization in early internationalization Research: A systematic literature review and future research directions, Journal of Business Research,Volume 186, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115043
  3. Li, J., & Xue, E. (2022). Exploring high-quality institutional internationalization for higher education sustainability in China: Evidence from stakeholders. Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7572
  4. Yuan, R., Li, S., & Yu, B. (2019). Neither “local” nor “global”: Chinese university students’ identity paradoxes in the internationalization of higher education. Higher Education. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-018-0313-7
  5. Cash, P., Isaksson, O., Maier, A. & Summers, J. (2022). Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations. Design Studies, Volume 78, ISSN 0142-694X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101077  
  6. Beine, M., Noël, R., & Ragot, L. (2014). Determinants of the international mobility of students. Economics of Education Review, 41, 40-54.
  7. Lim, W. M. (2024). What Is Quantitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264622
  8. El Refae, G. A.,  Kaba, A., & Eletter, S. (2021). The Impact of Demographic Characteristics on Academic Performance: Face-to-Face Learning Versus Distance Learning Implemented to Prevent the Spread of COVID19. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Volume 22, Number 1. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1289894.pdf
  9. Foskett, N. (2010). Global markets, national challenges, local strategies: The strategic challenge of internationalization. Globalization and internationalization in higher education: Theoretical, strategic and management perspectives, 35-50.
  10. Ma, W., & Yue, Y. (2015). Internationalization for quality in Chinese research universities: Student perspectives. Higher Education, 70, 217-234. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-015-9899-1 
  11. Ding, X. (2016). Exploring the experiences of international students in China. Journal of Studies in International Education. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1028315316647164
  12. Chu, H. N. R., Lee, W. S., & OBrien, P. W. (2018). Student satisfaction in an undergraduate international business EMI program: A case in southern Taiwan. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(3), 198-209. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1028315317748525
  13. van Teijlingen, E. & Hundley, V. (2022). The Importance of Pilot Studies. Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987). 16. 33-6. 10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214.
  14. Adeniran AO (2019). Scale’s Type and Cronbach’s Alpha Analysis in an Airport Perception Study. Sch J Appl Sci Res Vol: 2, Issu: 4 (01-05).
  15. Wright, E., & Yu, B. (2017). Academic adaptation amid internationalisation: The challenges for local, mainland Chinese, and international students at Hong Kong’s universities. Tertiary Education and Management. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1080/13583882.2017.1356365
  16. Gehlbach, H. & Brinkworth, (2011). Measure Twice, Cut Down Error: A Process for Enhancing the Validity of Survey Scales. Review of General Psychology. 15. 380. 10.1037/a0025704.
  17. Perez, M. (2020). The Impact of Demographic Factors on the Persistence, Study Habits, and Motivation of African American and Latino Male Community College Students. https://digitalscholarship.tsu.edu/dissertations/22
  18. Eagly, Alice. (2024). The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions Versus Social Roles. American Psychologist. 54. 408-423. 10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408.
  19. Arnett, J. J. (2020). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.
  20. Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2002). Push-pull factors influencing international student destination choice. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2), 82-90.
  21. Knight, J. (2024). The evolution of contemporary education hubs: Fad, brand or innovation? International Journal of Educational Development, 104, 102972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102972
  22. Bhandari, R., & Blumenthal, P. (2018). International students: A global perspective.
  23. Deardorff, D. K. (2023). Implementing intercultural competence assessment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(4), 387-400.
  24. Green, D. (2024). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34.
  25. Harvey, L., (2024). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34.
  26. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Center for Advanced Educational Services.
  27. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). *The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business Review Press.
  28. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Prentice Hall.
  29. Scriven, M. (1991). *Evaluation thesaurus. Sage Publications.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic