Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2025)

Influence of English on Local Languages: Perspectives fromKey Stakeholders

Mahadev Devkota | Nabaraj Neupane

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explores stakeholders' perceptions of the influence of English on indigenous/local languages. A phenomenological research design was employed to achieve this objective, involving the purposive selection of twelve participants, including teachers, students, and parents. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather in-depth information from the participants about their lived experiences with the English language. Further, direct observation was employed to collect information about the English language's status, prestige, and dignity. The findings indicate that the prevalence of English contributes to the decline of indigenous languages due to parental indifference, inadequate policy implementation, youth disinterest, and insufficient intergenerational language transmission. The failure to integrate regional languages with financial and technical domains further deteriorates linguistic erosion. This study underscores the need to sensitize stakeholders to actively support multilingual policies and community initiatives actively, ensuring that diverse languages thrive harmoniously.



References:

  1. Babaii, E., & Sheikhi, M. (2017). Traces of neoliberalism in English teaching materials: A critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1398671
  2. Banda, F. (2000). The dilemma of the mother tongue: Prospects of bilingual education in South Africa. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666589
  3. Guo, Y. & Beckett, G.H. (2007). The hegemony of English as a global language: Reclaiming local knowledge and culture in China. Convergence, 40(1), 117-132.
  4. Bekus, N. (2014). Hybrid linguistic identity of Post-Soviet Belarus. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 13, 26-51. http:/www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE:/2014/Bekus.pdf
  5. Central Bureau of Statics. (2021). National Population and Housing Census 2021. Author.
  6. Cho, J. (2014). Understanding the importance of English education in South Korea and exploring the reasons why South Korean students come to a University in the Midwest. (M.A), University of Nebraska, Digital Commons @ University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
  7. Cohen, Manion, & Morrison. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
  8. Cohen, Manion, & Morrison. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
  9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). (2018). The sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
  10. Eriksen, T. H. (1992). linguistic hegemony and minority resistance. Journal of Peace Research, 29(3), 313332.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343392029003007
  11. Erikson, (1970). Autobiographic notes on the identity crisis. 730-759.
  12. Gill, S. K. (2005). Language policy in Malaysia: Reversing direction. 4(3), 241-260.
  13. Gyanwali, G. (2022). Language Endangerment: A Critical Destiny of Indigenous Mother Tongues Decline in Nepal. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljssh.v2i2.72.
  14. Hanemann, U., & Scarpino, C. (2016). Literacy in multilingual and multicultural contexts: Effective approaches to adult learning and education. ERIC.
  15. Holborow, M. (2007). Language, ideology and neoliberalism. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.1.05hol
  16. Hossain, M. A., Nessa, M., & Kafi, M. A. (2015). Challenges of teaching English language at the primary level schools in Bangladesh. 15(1).
  17. Isern, N., & Fort, J. (2014). Language extinction and linguistic fronts. J R Soc Interface, 11(94), 20140028. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0028
  18. Ives, P. (2013). Global English, hegemony and education: Lessons from Gramsci. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(6), 661-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00498.x
  19. Kam, H. W. (2002). English language teaching in East Asia today: An overview. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(2), 1-
  20. 22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220203
  21. Kothari, C. R., & Creswell, J. W. (2004). Research Methodology: Research & Methods. Jaipur: New Age International.
  22. Kramer-Dahl, A. (2003). Reading the "Singlish debate": Construction of a crisis of language standards and language teaching in Singapore. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 2(3), 159-190. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0203_2
  23. Leitner, G. (2013). Australian English-The national language (Vol. 90). Walter de Gruyter.
  24. Llurda, E. (2004). Non-native-speaker teachers and English as an International Language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3).  http://doi.org/10.1111/J.1473-4192.2004.00068.x
  25. Maizatulliza, M., & Kiely, R. (2017). Students' evaluation of their English language learning experience. Dinamika Ilmu, 17(2).
  26. Ministry of Education. (1971). The National Education System Plan for 1971-76. Government of Nepal
  27. Ministry of Education Science and Technology. (2019). National Education Policy 2076. Author.
  28. Obiegbu, I. (2016). Language and culture: Nigerian perspective. African Research Review, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v10i4.5
  29. Ojha, L. P. (2018). Shifting the medium of instruction to English in community schools: Policies, practices and challenges in Nepal: Research, reflection and practice.
  30. Pagente, R. (2019). Reflections of students on their English language learning experiences.
  31. Phillipson, R. (2008). The linguistic imperialism of neoliberal empire. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 5(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427580701696886
  32. Phyak. (2013). Language ideologies and local languages as the medium-of-instruction policy: a critical ethnography of a multilingual school in Nepal. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 127-143.
  33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.775557
  34. Phyak, & Bui. (2014). Youth engaging language policy and planning: Ideologies and transformations from within. Language Policy, 13(2), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9303-x
  35. Piller, I., & Cho, J. (2013). Neoliberalism as language policy. Language in Society, 42(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404512000887
  36. Pun, M., & Gurung, K. (2020). Languages in Danger: How Can Linguistic Diversity Be Preserved and Promoted in Nepal? The Journal of Social Sciences Research. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.65.503.511
  37. Rana, K. (2018). Retention of English language tension in multilingual communities of Nepal: A review of teachers' narratives. Journal of NELTA, 23(1-2), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta. v23i1-2.23347
  38. Sah, P. K. (2020). Reproduction of nationalist and neoliberal ideologies in Nepal’s language and literacy policies. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1751063
  39. Sayer, P. (2015). “More & Earlier”: Neoliberalism and Primary English Education in Mexican Public Schools. L2 Journal, 7(3), 40-56.
  40. Schneider, E. W. (2003). The dynamics of new Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language, 79(2), 233281. doi:10.1353/lan.2003.0136
  41. Shamim, F. (2008). Trends, issues and challenges in English language education in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790802267324
  42. Talafhah, R., & Al-Jarrah, T. M. (2018). ESL teacher, student, and parent perceptions about barriers and criteria for using educational mobile applications to develop the language skills of ESL elementary school students. International Journal of English Research, 5(1), 20-32.
  43. The Constitution of Nepal, Constitutional Assembly Secretariate Singha Durbar Kathmandu (2015). The Interim Constitution of Nepal, 10 (Government of Nepal 2007).
  44. Turin, M. (2005). Language endangerment and linguistic rights in the Himalayas: A case study from Nepal. Mountain Research and Development, 25(1), 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2005)025  [0004: Lealri]2.0.
  45. Turin, M. (2007). Linguistic diversity and the preservation of endangered languages: A case study from Nepal: ICIMOD. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03083332v1
  46. Webber, J. R. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. In (vol. 59): JSTOR.
  47. Zavala, V. (2019). Tactics of intersubjectivity and boundary construction in language policy: An Andean case. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 19(2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2019.1649982
  48. Zhao, N. (2007). A study of high school students’ English learning anxiety. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 9(3), 22-33.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic