Interactive Reading-Aloud Strategy (IRAS) in Enhancing Reading Literacy: An Intervention Plan
Catherine Requilme
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This research employed a pretest-posttest control group research design to evaluate the efficacy of the Interactive Reading-Aloud Strategy (IRAS) as a reading intervention in enhancing reading literacy skills among Junior High School students. The study focused on comparing pretest and posttest results of the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) administered to students whose reading/english teacher implemented the IRAS.The research involved 150 Junior High School students from a public high school, and the primary findings indicated a significant positive impact of the IRAS on students' reading literacy skills. Specifically, the results revealed that students who underwent the IRAS intervention exhibited higher performance levels in the posttest compared to the pretest Phil-IRI results. Statistical analysis further confirmed a significant difference in scores between the pretest and posttest results of students who received the IRAS intervention. Moreover, the study highlighted a noteworthy improvement in the score gains of students who underwent the IRAS intervention, emphasizing the effectiveness of this strategy in fostering reading literacy skills. Students reported enjoying the reading process facilitated by the IRAS, with no encountered difficulties, and expressed anticipation for continued use of the strategy as a reading intervention. The research concludes with a proposal to integrate the Interactive Reading-Aloud Strategy into reading literacy programs for Junior High School students, emphasizing its potential to enhance their overall reading skills. Recommendations include providing students with adequate time for self-paced learning with the aid of the IRAS, encouraging teachers to develop strategic intervention materials for mastering prerequisite skills, and advocating for training workshops/webinars on crafting and implementing the IRAS. Additionally, parents are encouraged to support teachers in conducting interventions for their children's reading literacy achievement. The study suggests that future research should explore the utilization of the IRAS in other subject areas to address learning poverty on reading.
References:
- Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. Guilford Press.
- Boundless Education. (2016). Effective teaching strategies. Retrieved from https://www.boundless.com/education/ textbooks/boundless-education textbook/working with-students-4/teaching-strategies-21/effective teachingstrategies-64 1299
- Brown, A. L. (2001). Interactive read-aloud: Is there a common set of implementation practices? The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 300-308.
- Calderón, M., & Minaya-Rowe, L. (2003). Reading aloud to middle school students: A study of effective classroom practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(6), 458-465.
- Clarke, P. J., Truelove, E., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2013). Developing reading comprehension. John Wiley & Sons.
- Cole, M. W., Dunston, P. J., & Butler, T. (2017). Engaging English language learners through interactive read-alouds: a literature review. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 16(1), 97–109. doi:10.1108/etpc-11-2015-0101
- Dela Cruz, A. (2018). Interactive Read-Aloud in the Philippines: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, 14(2), 59-69.
- Ding, Y., & Reilly, L. (2011). Investigating the impact of read-aloud accommodation on the reading comprehension performance of high school students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(4), 304-311.
- Fisher, D., Flood, J., Lapp, D., & Frey, N. (2004). Interactive Read-Alouds: Is There a Common Set of Implementation Practices? The Reading Teacher, 58(1), 8–17. doi:10.1598/rt.58.1.1
- Hall, L. A., Sabey, B. L., & McClellan, S. R. (2005). Interactive read-aloud with content area literature in the middle school classroom: A collaborative action research project. Reading Improvement, 42(2), 71-80.
- Hiebert, E. H., & Fisher, C. W. (2005). Interactive read-aloud: Teachers and researchers share stories of success. The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 742-753.
- Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Hindman, A. H., Wasik, B. A., & Erbeli, F. (2014). Classroom predictors of the early language and literacy development of disadvantaged preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 411-421.
- Johnson, A. P. (2017). A study of the effects of teacher-led interactive read-aloud on reading comprehension in middle school. Reading Improvement, 54(4), 157-166.
- Justice, L. M., McGinty, A. S., & Kaderavek, J.N. (2010). The effects of a supplementary preschool small-group vocabulary intervention on word learning and conceptualdevelopment: A randomized field trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(2), 382-394.
- Justice, L. M., Meier, J., & Walpole, S. (2005). Learning new words from storybooks: An efficacy study with at-risk kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(1), 17-32.
- Kamil, M. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacReading for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
- Kim, J. S., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Wei, S., & Murray, C. S. (2016). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(4), 436–452.
- Kletzien, S. B., & Dreher, M. J. (2004). Literacy instruction for adolescents: Researchbased practice. Guilford Press.
- LaRocque, M., Klecker, B., & Herrmann-Abell, C. F. (2018). The effects of interactive read-aloud on the comprehension of narrative and informational text: A metaanalysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 761-781.
- Lennox, S. (2013). Interactive Read-Alouds—An Avenue for Enhancing Children’s
- Language for Thinking and Understanding: A Review of Recent Research. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(5), 381–389. doi:10.1007/s10643-013-0578-5
- Lewis, J. (2009). Reading aloud to adolescents: How much is too much? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 125-134.
- Mazzoni, S. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2006). Reading aloud to middle school students: Issues that affect comprehension. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(4), 266-273.
- McTigue, E. M. (2009). Teaching through text: Reading and writing in the content areas.
- Pearson. Nation, K., & Norbury, C. F. (2015). Why reading comprehension fails: Insights from developmental disorders. Topics in Language Disorders, 35(1), 7–20.
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
- Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
- Reyes, E. M. (2016). Improving Reading Comprehension Through Interactive Read-Aloud. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(12), 95-108.
- Roble, S. (2020). The effectiveness of interactive read-aloud in improving the reading comprehension of grade 8 students in a public secondary school in Cebu Province. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(4), 115-121. doi 10.5539/jel.v 9n4p115
- Savage, R. S., & Ward, M. B. (2010). The impact of interactive read-aloud on the reading comprehension of high school students. Reading Improvement, 47(3), 119-128.
- Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Center on Instruction.
- Senechal, M., & LeFevre, J. A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children's reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445-460.
- Shanahan, T. (2006). Does interactive read-aloud instruction work in middle schools? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(4), 308-315.
- Swanson, E., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Heckert, J., Cavanaugh, C., …Tackett, K. (2011). A Synthesis of Read-Aloud Interventions on Early Reading Outcomes Among Preschool Through Third Graders at Risk for Reading Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3), 258–275. doi:10.1177/0022219410378444
- Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in a social context. Cambridge University Press.
- Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. A. (2005). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum. Pearson.
- Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271296.
- Villas, D. D., & Garcia, J. S. (2018). Effects of interactive read-aloud on comprehension of literary elements of grade 8 students in a public school in Cebu City. Philippine Journal of Science,147(2), 77-90.
- Westerveld, M. F., & Moran, C. (2011). Interactive read-aloud: Teacher and student voices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(2), 98-107.
- Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., & Hampston, J. M. (1998). Literacy instruction in nine first grade classrooms: Teacher characteristics and student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 99(2), 101-128.
- Wiederholt, J. L., & Jones, C. D. (2004). Read aloud accommodation: Effects of oral reading rates on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 723-730.
- Williams, C. E. (2011). A critique of the interactive read-aloud and its use with adolescents. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(4), 329-337.
- Wiseman, A. (2011). Interactive read-alouds: Teachers and students constructing knowledge and literacy together. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 431-438.
- Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.