Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 35 no. 1 (2025)

Exploring the Understanding of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices in Machine Shop Operations by Analysing the Technical Skills and Safety Awareness of Marine Engineering Students

Rosie Mendoza | Emmanuel Dumloan | Eugenio Baloro Jr | Jose Eleo Capaps | Prospero Carbonilla | Robert Maluya

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Machine shop operations are essential in marine engineering education, equipping students with vital technical skills necessary for both shipboard industrial maintenance. However, noticeable gaps exist in students' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to machine shop operations, which could potentially impact their competency and safety in maritime careers. This study aims to evaluate the KAP levels of marine engineering students concerning machine shop operations, specifically focusing on their tool usage, adherence to safety protocols, and problem-solving capabilities. To collect data, the researchers employed a descriptive research design that included structured surveys and direct observations to assess the KAP levels of students currently enrolled in or recently completed with machine shop training. The findings indicate that students generally possess a solid understanding of tool functions and safety protocols. While their attitudes reflect a strong belief in the importance of practical skills, their confidence levels appear to vary. In terms of practices, students demonstrate a commendable commitment to safety measures, though they tend to seek feedback from instructors less frequently. These insights highlight the need for enhanced practical training, improved feedback systems, and curriculum enhancements to strengthen students' problem-solving abilities and confidence, ultimately better preparing them for the demands of the maritime industry.



References:

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Billett, S. (2016). Apprenticeship as a mode of learning and model of education Education + Training, 58(6), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2016-0001
  3. Chi, M. T. H., Kang, S., & Yaghmourian, D. (2018). Why students learn more from dialogic versus didactic instruction: A meta-analytic review.        Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1456389
  4. Grollmann, P. (2018). Professional competence as a benchmark for vocational education and training. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 70(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2017.1358928
  5. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.           https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
  6. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning            and development. Prentice-Hall.
  7. Kolmos, A., Hadgraft, R. G., & Holgaard, J. E. (2016). Response strategies for curriculum change in engineering. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3), 391-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-    015-9309-7
  8. Kumar, S., Tan, J., & Li, P. (2019). Attitude and learning outcomes: The role of engagement in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 9(2), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v9i2.10134
  9. Lingard, H., Cooke, T., & Blismas, N. (2014). Do site safety climate and safety behavior really matter in the construction industry? Safety Science, 62, 353-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.008
  10. Nielsen, K. (2019). Apprenticeship learning and vocational education. Education + Training, 61(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2018-0112
  11. Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2017). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661
  12. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social-emotional learning: Theory, research, and practice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101830
  13. Singh, R., Patel, A., & Sharma, D. (2020). The role of practical training in marine engineering education: A safety and efficiency perspective. Journal of       Maritime Education and Training, 25(3), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14701488.2020.1830345
  14. Tuan, H., Chin, C., & Shieh, S. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654.       https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737
  15. Turner, N., Stride, C., Carter, A., McCaughey, D., & Carroll, A. (2015). Job demands-control-support model and employee safety performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 82, 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.028
  16. Wang, Y., & Lu, X. (2020). Safety knowledge and operational practices in technical training: Insights from engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 23(3), 34-45.
  17. World Health Organization. (2008). A guide to developing KAP surveys. WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/a-guide-to-developing-kap-surveys
  18. Wang, Y., & Lu, X. (2020). Safety knowledge and operational practices in technical training: Insights from engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 23(3), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1109/JEER.2020.2930746

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic