Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 35 no. 1 (2025)

Exploring Grade 12 Students' Perceptions Towards Qualitative Research

Karen Gay Patria-dy | Aisah Paulo | Racmah Mackno-borngo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined Grade 12 students' perceptions of qualitative research to understand their engagement and challenges. Conducted at Mindanao State University - Maigo School of Arts and Trades (MSU-MSAT) during the School Year 2024-2025, the research utilized a mixed-method (quali-quanti) approach, integrating qualitative and quantitative methodologies to capture a comprehensive perspective. A validated survey questionnaire was employed, divided into two parts: a four-point Likert scale to measure familiarity and perceptions, and open-ended questions for qualitative insights. Twenty-five senior high school students participated, selected through purposive sampling to ensure accurate representation. Thematic analysis was used to interpret qualitative data effectively. Findings indicated that students, mostly female, viewed qualitative research as a tool to explore meanings and human experiences. They found it engaging but challenging due to difficulties in research skills such as time management, self-discipline, data collection, analysis, and sampling procedures. Other challenges included critical thinking, grammar, vocabulary, and participant cooperation. Students expressed the need for training in information gathering, experiential learning, and skill development. They recognized the value of qualitative research in problem-solving, critical thinking, and understanding real-world issues. The study concluded that while qualitative research is demanding, it remains a valuable academic and practical tool. It recommended implementing a comprehensive support program, including mentorship and professional development for teachers, to enhance students' research capabilities.



References:

  1. Alam, M. S., & Asmawi, A. (2024). Qualitative research: Defining features and guiding  principles. Forum for Education Studies, 2(2), 1262.    https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i2.1262.
  2. Almasan, M.C. and Viňas, J.V. (2023). understanding the challenges and adaptive strategies in teaching practical research subjects. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. https://cognizancejournal.com/vol3issue10/V3I1022.pdf.
  3. Bangalan, R.C. and Hipona, J.B. (2020). Senior high students’ attitude and barriers in conducting research: A platform to enhance scientific pedagogical learning. Cosmos An International Journal of Art &Higher Education: A Refereed Research Journal. https://cosmosjournals.com/wp- content/uploads/2021/05/CAHE-JD201.
  4. Bliss, L. (2020). Phenomenological research: Inquiry to understand the meanings of people’s experiences international journal of adult vocational education and technology. https://sageprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/.
  5. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77-101. ISSN1478-0887 Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11735.
  6. Budai, K.S. & Skipwith, S.B. (2021). Best practices in engaging online learners through active and experiential learning. (2nd ed,) https://www.routledge.com.
  7. Busetto, L., Wick, W., Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341672281.
  8. Creswell, J.W. & Poth, C. N. (2020). Qualitative inquiry and research design. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-inquiry-and-research- design/book266033.
  9. Delve, Ho, L., & Limpaecher, A. (2024). Understanding qualitative research in education. https://delvetool.com/blog/qualitative
  10. George, A.S., Baskar, D.T., Srikaanth, P.B. (2024). The erosion of cognitive skills in the technological age: How reliance on technology impacts critical thinking, problem- solving, and creativity. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381452876.
  11. Maestrini, V., Luzzini, D., Shani, A. B., & Canterino, F. (2020). The action research cycle reloaded: Conducting action research across buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management.
  12. McLymont, E.F.N. (2021). Qualitative research method:  A critical analysis. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3845254.
  13. Oranga, J. & Matere A. (2023). Qualitative research: Essence, types and advantages Scientific Research Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/..
  14. Rose, R. Narayan, J, & Malkani, R. (2024). The impact of short-term training in qualitative research methods delivered to emerging researchers in disability education in India. Asian Journal of Education and Training. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1437945.pdf.
  15. Saadat, S.A., Fallah, M.H., Yazdi, H,V, (2022). Developing and validating educational strategies for couples to enhance family bonds: A qualitative expert analysis. Thrita Journal of Neuron. brieflands.com.
  16. Sarkies, M.N., Bowles, K.A., Skinner, E.H., Haas, R., Lane, H., & Haines, T.P. (2020). The effectiveness of research implementation strategies for promoting evidenced-informed policy and management decisions in health care: A systematic review. https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-017-0662-0.
  17. Silverio, S. A., Sheen, K. S., Bramante, A., Knighting, K., Koops, T. U., Montgomery, E.,   November, L., Soulsby, L. K., Stevenson, J. H., Watkins, M. C., Easter, A., &   Sandall, J. (2022). Sensitive, challenging, and difficult topics: Experiences and practical considerations for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221124739.
  18. Tenny, S., Brannan, J.M., & Brannan, J.D. (2022). Qualitative study. National Library of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic