Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 48 no. 10 (2025)

The Filipino Version of Public Apology as a Component of the Complex Dynamics of Cancel Culture: A Multimodal Analysis

R Pulan | Phyll Jhann E. Gildore

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to analyze the Filipino version of public apology within the complex dynamics of cancel culture, focusing on how these apologies are constructed, perceived, and responded to in Philippine digital spaces. Employing a qualitative research design, the study utilized both multimodal analysis and sentiment analysis. Twenty-five public apology videos from Filipino public figures across various social media platforms were collected and rigorously examined for linguistic and non-verbal cues, alongside audience comments. The analysis revealed that Filipino public apologies predominantly employ connected framing and eye-level vertical angles, fostering a sense of equality and directness. While these strategies were consistent, they were not always sufficient to mitigate hostile reception. A range of apology strategies, including acknowledging responsibility, promising forbearance, offering compensation, making amends, and expressing remorse, was also identified. Sentiment analysis revealed a varied yet often polarized audience reception, with negative sentiment being most prevalent, suggesting public skepticism despite strategic multimodal efforts. The findings highlight the crucial role of multimodal elements in shaping the authenticity and effectiveness of public apologies within the context of cancel culture. This research contributes to understanding crisis communication in digital environments, highlights cultural nuances in Filipino apologies, and emphasizes the need for enhanced media literacy and ethical digital citizenship.



References:

  1. Abbas, A., & Janjua, F. (2022). An Ecosophical Exploration of War and Violence in Graphic Novel Vanni: A Representational Visual Meta-Function            Analysis. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 6(I), 144-159. https://doi.org/10.33195/6cp26h58
  2. Abudin, B., & Sundari, H. (2021). Exploring apology strategy by Indonesian public figures: A Pragmatic study in social media. DEIKSIS, 13(2),        122.      https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v13i2.7627
  3. Adeyemi, V. (2025). The Psychological Impact of Cancel Culture: Anxiety, Social Isolation, and Self-Censorship. Premier Journal of Psychology, 2, 100005.      DOI: https://doi.org/10.70389/PJP.100005
  4. Adrian, D., & Faiza, E. (2022). Women’s empowerment in Nike Advertisements: A multimodal analysis. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(3), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i3.22081
  5. Aggarwal, R., & Brenner, A. M. (2020). # MeToo: The role and power of bystanders (aka us). Academic Psychiatry, 44(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-019-01173-0
  6. Agustian, A. F., Syamsiah, N., Zahira, Z., & Afriansyah, R. P. (2023). Visual representation of TV commercials. LingPoet Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32734/lingpoet.v4i1.10781
  7. Anam, I., Tehseem, T., & Jabeen, I. (2022). An analysis of linguistic strategies in personal public apologies of Pakistani media figures. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(2), http://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2022(6-II)23
  8. Anikin, D. A., & Ivanova, D. D. (2024). “So the Last Will Be First”: Cancel Culture as an Instrument of Symbolic Policy. Changing Societies & Personalities. 2024. Vol. 8. Iss. 4, 8(4), 847-860. 10.15826/csp.2024.8.4.302
  9. Arendt, C., LaFleche, M., & Limperopulos, M. A. (2017). A qualitative meta      analysis of apologia, image repair, and crisis communication: Implications for theory and practice. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 517-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.005
  10. Aydin, M. (2013). Cross cultural pragmatics: A study of apology speech acts by Turkish speakers. Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/269/
  11. Banff, A., Compeau, D., & Meister, D. INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCEON INDIVIDUAL ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF AN IT INNOVATION1. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/3223860/INFORMATIONAL_SOCIAL_INFLUNCE_ON_INDIVIDUAL_ACCEPTANCE_AND_USE_OF_AN_IT_INNOVATION_1
  12. Banikalef, A., & Marlyna, M. (2013). Apology Strategies of Jordanian EFL Postgraduate Students. Bangi: UKM. DOI: 10.17576/gema-2015-1502-06
  13. Barchas-Lichtenstein, J., & D’Arcy, A. (2020). Hedge Words. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0150
  14. Bargiela-Chiappini, F., & Haugh, M. (2009). Face communication and social interaction. In University of Toronto Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781845537258    
  15. Belgrimet, S., & Rabab’ah, G. (2021). A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of English Posters in Violence Awareness Campaigns against Women. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1102.12
  16. Benoit, W. L. (1995). Sears’ repair of its auto service image: Image restorationdiscourse in the corporate sector. Communication Studies, 46(1-2), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979509368441
  17. Benoit, W. L. (2006). Image repair in President Bush’s April 2004 news conference. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.02.025
  18. Benoit, W. L. (2014). President Barack Obama’s image repair on HealthCare. gov. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 733-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.003
  19. Bishop, J. (2014). Representations of ‘trolls’ in mass media communication: a      review of media-texts and moral panics relating to ‘internet trolling’. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 10(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2014.058384
  20. Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied linguistics, 5(3), 196-213. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.187
  21. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). The CCSARP coding manual. In S. Blum- Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics:  Requests and apologies (pp. 273-294). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  22. Boran, S. (n.d.). Public Apologies How Television Influences their Effectiveness. Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11595383.pdf
  23. Brooks, C. I., Church, M. A., & Fraser, L. (1986). Effects of the duration of eye contact on judgments of personality characteristics. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1986.9713572
  24. Bruhl, R., Basel, J. S., & Kury, M. F. (2018). € Communication after an integrity-based trust violation: How organizational account giving affects trust. European      Management Journal, 36(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.08.001
  25. Bryson, A., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2021). Accounting for the past: the role of public apologies in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 37(4), 571 595. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2021.2020255
  26. Bünzli, F., Eppler, M. J., Stanoevska-Slabeva, K., & Hofer, A. (2024). Expressing demands or offers: How to promote volunteering using visual and verbal appeals. International Journal of Business Communication, 61(3), 502-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884221104799
  27. Burnkrant, R. E., & Cousineau, A. (1975). Informational and normative social      influence in buyer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3),  206. https://doi.org/10.1086/208633
  28. Carroll, N. (1993). Toward a theory of point-of-view editing: Communication,      emotion, and the movies. Poetics Today, 14, 123. https://doi.org/10.2307/1773144
  29. Carvell, M., & Nordgren, A. (2023). The cancel culture conundrum: Exploring the risks for influencer marketing (Master’s thesis, Department of Business      Administration, Lund University). LUP Student Papers.
  30. Cerulo, K. A., & Ruane, J. M. (2014). Apologies of the Rich and Famous. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(2), 123 149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514530412 
  31. Chung, S., & Lee, S. (2021). Crisis management and corporate apology: The effects of   causal attribution and apology type on publics’ cognitive and affective responses. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(1), 125-144. DOI: 10.1177/2329488417735646
  32. Ciftci, O. F. (2017). Shot sizes in main title design and analysis of ‘The Pacific’      series main title design shot sizes. [Online]. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences. [Online]. 4(11), 42-52. Available from: www.prosoc.eu
  33. Clark, M. D. (2020). DRAG THEM: A brief etymology of so-called “cancel culture.” Communication and the Public, 5(3–4), 88 92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320961562
  34. Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21, 22-36. doi:10.1177/0143034300211002
  35. Cugueró-Escofet, N., Fortin, M. & Canela, MA. Righting the Wrong for Third Parties: How Monetary Compensation, Procedure Changes and Apologies Can Restore Justice for Observers of Injustice. J Bus Ethics 122, 253–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1762-7
  36. Dela, R. J. P. O., & B, C. L. (2016). Is it too Late Now to Say Sorry? – The Language of Public Apologies in the Contexts of American and Philippine Television. I, the manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 6(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.6.2.5979  
  37. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social      Psychology, 51(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
  38. Duguid, A. (2015). Public apologies and media evaluations. Discourse in and through the media: Recontextualizing and reconceptualizing expert discourse, 146-170. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/AlisonDuguid/publication/301888972_Public_apologies_and_media_evaluation/links/572b1cb608aef5d48d325e8f/Public-apologies-and-mediaevaluations.pdf
  39. Dynel, M. (2016). “Trolling is not stupid”: Internet trolling as the art of deception serving entertainment. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(3), 353–381.https://doi.org/10.1515/ip2016-0015
  40. Elsanhoury, M., Seddek, A. M. R. M., Sarwat, N. M., & Debian, R. E. A. (2020). A multimodal discourse analysis of political speeches: the case of Donald Trump’s 2016 election speeches. Journal of Language and Literature, 20(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v20i2.2390
  41. Enworo, O. C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln’s parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems. Qualitative research journal, 23(4), 372-384. doi/10.1108/qrj-082022-0116
  42. Eryılmaz, Ö. (2022). Are dissertations trustworthy enough? The case of Turkish ph. d. dissertations on social studies education. Participatory Educational  Research, 9(3), 344-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.22.70.9.3
  43. Ferguson, D. P., Wallace, J. D., & Chandler, R. C. (2018). Hierarchical consistency of strategies in image repair theory: PR practitioners’ perceptions of effective and preferred crisis communication strategies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(5–6), 251 272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2018.1545129
  44. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An      Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  45. Forero, R., Nahidi, S., De Costa, J. et al. Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine. BMC Health       Serv Res 18, 120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2915-2
  46. Geenen, J., Norris, S., & Makboon, B. (2015). Multimodal discourse analysis. The  International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1:17. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi095
  47. George, A. M. (2020). Sorry is not enough: Apology as a crisis management tactic. Proceedings of the International Crisis and Risk Communication Conference, Volume 3 (pp. 10-16). Orlando FL: Nicholson School of Communication and Media. https://www.doi.org/10.30658/icrcc.2020.3
  48. Gibney, M., Howard-Hassmann, R., Coicaud, J.-M., Steiner, N., et al. (2008). The Age of Apology: Facing up to the Past, Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Retrieved from: https://www.pennpress.org/9780812220872/the-age-of-apology/
  49. Goffman, E. (1963). Embarrassment and Social Organization. In N. J. Smelser & W. T. Smelser (Eds.), Personality and social systems (pp. 541–548). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1037/11302-050
  50. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
  51. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books
  52. Gudankwar, A., Mendhe P. M., Oghari L. N., Yemde A. R., SENTIMENTS OF PUBLIC OPINION International Research Journal of Modernization in   Engineering Technology and Science. https://doi.org/10.56726/irjmets50838
  53. Hall, T. E. (1970). The hidden dimension. Applied Ergonomics, 1(3), 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(70)90049-9
  54. Hamed Ahmed, N. (2018). A multimodal study of the visual features in David      Cameron’s apology for Bloody Sunday. Annals of the Faculty of Arts, Ain Shams University, 46(16), 269-290. doi: 10.21608/aafu.2018.208121
  55. Hanania, R. (2019). Does apologizing work? An empirical test of the conventional wisdom. Behavioural Public Policy, 6(4), 516 529. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2019.35
  56. Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of politeness research, 6(2),215-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2010.011
  57. Hassan, F. A. (2014). Apology strategies in Central Kurdish with reference to English : an empirical study in socio pragmatics. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.665594
  58. Hemsley, G. D., & Doob, A. N. (1978). The effect of looking behavior on perceptions of a Communicator’s credibility 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8(2), 136-142.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15591816.1978.tb00772.x
  59. Hodeib, C. (2019). Apology Strategies in Syrian Arabic. https://dea.lib.unideb.hu/dea/handle/2437/322331
  60. Hodgins, H. S., & Liebeskind, E. (2003). Apology versus defense: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 297–316. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00024-6
  61. Hodgins, H. S., & Liebeskind, E. (2003). Apology versus defense: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of experimental social psychology, 39(4), 297-316. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00024-6
  62. Ikhlef, A., & Awad, Z. M. (2023). Gender in Fashion Advertising on Social Media: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis approach. Theory and Practice in         Language Studies, 13(7), 1801 1809. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1307.25
  63. Irawan, S. M., & Hardjanto, T. D. (2021). A gender-based study of apology strategies employed by Indonesian students. Lexicon, 8(1), 12 23.  https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v8i1.65770
  64. Ismail, W. N. F. W., Zaidi, N. N. A., Rani, M. S. A., Kamaruzaman, S., & Abdullah, N. H. (2022). Malaysian public figures’ apology strategies. International      Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i12/15493
  65. Janssens, J., & Spreeuwenberg, L. (2022). The moral implications of cancel culture. Ethical perspectives, 29(1), 89-114. doi: 10.2143/EP.29.1.3290737
  66. Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, Literacy, Learning: A Multimodal Approach (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964101 
  67. Johannessen, I. (2023). Does Cancel Culture pose a threat to Democracy? An exploration of the impact of cancel culture on democracy [Undergraduate essay, Institute of Philosophy and First Semester Studies, Spring 2023]. ResearchGate.
  68. Jones, R. H. (2012). Multimodal discourse analysis. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0813   
  69. Jyoti Yadav. (2023). Sentiment Analysis on Social Media. Qeios.  doi:10.32388/YF9X04.
  70. Kakar, Z. U. H., Rasheed, R., Rashid, A., & Akhter, S. (2023). CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING AND ENSURING THE TRUSTWORTHINESS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. International Journal of Business Reflections, 4(2), 150–173. https://doi.org/10.56249/ijbr.03.01.44
  71. Kalkhoff, W. (2005). Collective validation in multi-actor task groups: the effects of status differentiation. Soc. Psychol. Q. 68, 57–74. doi: 10.1177/019027250506800105
  72. Kim, H., Kim, H., Kim, J., & Jang, J. W. (2022). When does it become harassment? An investigation of online criticism and calling out in Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555575
  73. Kim, H., Park, J., Cha, M., & Jeong, J. (2015b). The effect of bad news and CEO apology of corporate on user responses in social media. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0126358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126358   
  74. Knoche, H., McCarthy, J., & Sasse, M. A. (2006). A close-up on Mobile TV: The effect of low resolutions on shot types. In Proceedings of EuroITV (Vol. 6). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/147978275.pdf
  75. Koskinen, E., Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2021). The Recognition and Interactional Management of Face Threats: Comparing Neurotypical Participants and Participants with Asperger’s Syndrome. Social Psychology Quarterly, 84(2), 132-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725211003023
  76. Kress, Gunter, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. In London. New York: Edward  Arnold/ Nottinghamshire; Oxford University Press.
  77. Kress, Gunter, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of      visual design (2nd edition). London & New York: Routledge (1st edition        1996)
  78. Kreysa, H., Kessler, L., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2016). Direct speaker gaze      promotes trust in truth-ambiguous statements. PloS one, 11(9), e0162291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162291
  79. Kriyantono, R. (2019). Apologia: strategies and ethical aspects of government public relations in a crisis situation. Jurnal Representamen Vol, 5(02). DOI: 10.30996/representamen.v5i02.2937
  80. Kurniawan, T., Ngawan, R., Alno, Y., & Herianto, A. (2022). CANCEL CULTURE AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM: A Perspective from Democratic-Deliberative    Education Philosophy. WASKITA Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai Dan      Pembangunan Karakter, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.waskita.2022
  81. Kuusilehto, V. (2018). “I’m very sorry to say that I’ve behaved badly”: image repair, public apologies and non-apologies during the Weinstein scandal (Bachelor’s thesis, V. Kuusilehto). https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu201805041585
  82. Lamsijärvi, E. (2024). “Please forgive me”: image repair strategies in social media apologies on Twitter and YouTube (Master’s thesis, E. Lamsijärvi). Retrieved from: https://oulurepo.oulu.fi/handle/10024/49816
  83. Lazare, A. (2004). On Apology. Oxford University Press, USA. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=P9iADDrEI_AC&printsec=frontcoer&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
  84. Lewicki, R. J., Polin, B., & Lount Jr, R. B. (2016). An exploration of the structure of effective apologies. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 9(2), 177-196.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12073
  85. Liamputtong, P. (2019), “Qualitative inquiry”, in Liamputtong, P. (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, Springer Nature Pte Ltd, Singapore, pp. 9-26.
  86. Lim, F. V. (2018). Developing a systemic functional approach to teach multimodal literacy. Functional Linguistics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-0180066-8   
  87. Lim, F.V., & Tan-Chia, L. (2022). Designing Learning for Multimodal Literacy: Teaching Viewing and Representing (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003258513
  88. Lim, K. (2020, July 19). Cancel culture: How Asia’s ‘woke brigade’ became a political force. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from:  https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/lifestyleculture/article/3093736/cancelculture-how-asias-woke-brigade-became-political
  89. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, 289-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  90. Linh, N. T. T. (2021). A multimodal discourse analysis of romantic comedy movie posters. VNU Journal of Foreign   Studies, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4647
  91. Liu, B. (2017). Many facets of sentiment analysis. In Socio-affective computing (pp. 11–39). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55394-8_2  
  92. Liu, J., & Su, Z. (2023). Cancel culture: An Interdisciplinary Analysis from Mindsets to Social Practices. Advances in Education, Humanities, and Social Science Research, 6(1), 324. https://doi.org/10.56028/aehssr.6.1.324.2023
  93. Liu, S., & Li, X. (2021). A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of Corporate Apologies by Starbucks CEO from the Perspective of Crisis      Management. Scientific and Social Research, 3(2), 114 123. https://doi.org/10.36922/ssr.v3i2.1115
  94. Macken-Horarik, M. (2004). Interacting with the multimodal text: Reflections on image and verbiage in art express. Visual communication, 3(1), 5-26. Ewing, L., Rhodes, G., & Pellicano, E. (2010). Have you got the look? Gaze direction affects judgements of facial attractiveness. Visual Cognition, 18(3), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280902965599
  95. Manning, R., Levine, M., & Collins, A. (2007). The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: The parable of the 38 witnesses. American Psychologist, 62, 555–562. doi:10.1037/0003- 066X.62.6.555
  96. Mashiur, S.M., Rahman, Mohammad, S., & Mashiur Rahman, L. (2024). Sociolinguistic Implications of Cancel Culture: The Prose of Language, Power and Social Dynamics in Digital Spaces. British Journal of Arts and Humanities. DOI:10.34104/bjah.02403170324
  97. Mazzarella, D., Reinecke, R., Noveck, I., Mercier, H. (2018). Saying, presupposing and implicating: how pragmatics modulates commitment. Journal of     Pragmatics, 133, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.009
  98. Miao, J., Liu, G., & Luo, T. (2023). The Sentiment Analysis of Small and Medium      sized Investors on the Interactive Communication Platforms Based on Deep      Learning. 856–861. https://doi.org/10.1145/3659211.3659359    
  99. Miller, N., & Maruyama, G. (1979). Normative Influence in Desegregated Classrooms. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED181101.pdf
  100. Minkkinen, L. (2024). “Girl, you’re still cancelled”: analysis of public ‘cancel culture’apologies and responses. Retrieved from: https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/95151/URN%3ANBN%3Afi3Ajyu-202405243916.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  101. Moerdisuroso, I. (2017). Social Semiotics and Visual Grammar: A Contemporary Approach to Visual Text research. Deleted Journal, 1(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.24821/ijcas.v1i1.1574
  102. Morse JM. Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Health Research. 2015;25(9):1212-1222.      doi:10.1177/1049732315588501
  103. Musyayyab, I., & Arimi, S. (2022). A conceptual metaphor on the expression of apology: A case study of the Indonesian Lawyers Club Discussion (A   Cognitive Linguistic Study). LingPoet Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research, 3(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.32734/lingpoet.v3i2.8890
  104. Navarro-Carrillo, G., Torres-Marín, J., & Carretero-Dios, H. (2021). Do trolls just want to have fun? Assessing the role of humor-related traits in online trolling behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106551  
  105. Navera, J. a. S., & Gustilo, L. (2021). Knowledge types and   presuppositions. Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 32(2), 27 298. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20043.nav
  106. Norris, P. (2020). Closed minds? Is a ‘Cancel culture’ stifling academic freedom and intellectual debate in political science? SSRN Electronic     Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.367102
  107. Ocampo, D. M. (2022). Disempowering the powerful: A critical pragmatic analysis     of political discourse using Brown and Levinson’s Face Theory. Rajasthali  Journal, 2(1), 55-62. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-824X  
  108. Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. (1983). Apology: A speech act set. Sociolinguistics and language acquisition, 18, 35.
  109. Oranga, J., & Matere, A. (2023). Qualitative Research: Essence, Types, and Advantages. OALib, 10(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001
  110. Owen, M. (1983). Apologies and Remedial Interchanges: A Study of Language      Use in Social Interaction. Mouton.
  111. P. Bell, M. Milic. Goffman’s Gender Advertisements Revisited: Combining Content Analysis With Semiotic Analysis. Visual Communication, 2002, 1(2): 203      222. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100205
  112. Pace, K. M., Fediuk, T. A., & Botero, I. C. (2010). The acceptance of responsibility and expressions of regret in organizational apologies after a transgression. Corporate Communications, 15, 410–427. doi.org/10.1108/13563281011085510
  113. Palomares, M. A., Dumlao, R., Cabacungan, L. J., Acera, A., Ancheta, W. M.,  Gelacio, R., ... & Balmaceda, D. (2022). Cancel Culture: A Case Study on the Experiences of Called-out Person in Social Media. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 3(1), 121-142.  Retrieved from https://ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/101
  114. Pandey, S. C., & Patnaik, S. (2014). Establishing reliability and validity in      qualitative inquiry: A critical examination. Jharkhand Journal of Development and Management Studies, 12(1), 5743-5753. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371731575_Establishing_Reliablity_and_Validity_in_Qualitative_Inquiry_A_Critical_Examination
  115. Pant, K. R. (2023). Eight moments in the history of qualitative research. AMC Journal (Dhangadhi), 4(1), 38 44. https://doi.org/10.3126/amcjd.v4i1.58830  
  116. Park, J., Kim, H., Cha, M., & Jeong, J. (2011). CEO’s Apology in Twitter: A Case Study of the Fake Beef Labeling Incident by E-Mart. In Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 300–303). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-247040_34
  117. Park, S., & Choi, J. A. (2023). Comparing public responses to apologies: examining crisis communication strategies using network analysis and topic modeling. Quality & Quantity, 57(4), 3603-3620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01488-5
  118. Ping, K. (2018). A visual grammar analysis of Lesaffre’s website. Advances in language and literary studies, 9(6), 38-41. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.6p.38
  119. Plieger, F. I. (2021). Discourse in the Age of Cancel Culture: An Analysis of Twitter’s Polarising Conversations (Bachelor’s thesis).
  120. Qi, J., & Hemchua, S. (2022). Analyzing the English comic version of the Analects of Confucius based on visual grammar. Language Related Research, 13(5), 391–419. https://doi.org/10.52547/lrr.13.5.15
  121. Redmond, M. V. (2015). Face and politeness theories. Iowa State University Digital Repository. Retrieved from: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/976d221e-a6d3-4b0aafec-d9b8b035724c/content 
  122. Romano, A. (2019). December 30. Vox: Why we can’t stop fighting about cancel culture. https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/12/30/20879720/what-is-cancelcultureexplained-history-debate
  123. Rooney, B., & Bálint, K. E. (2018). Watching more closely: shot scale affects film viewers’ theory of mind tendency but not ability. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02349
  124. Rozak, M. N. A., Habsari, S. K., & Farhah, E. (2025). Persecution of Non-Monogamous Offenders in the Cancel Culture Phenomenon on Social Media. The Journal of Society and Media, 9(1), 97-120. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v9n1.p97-120
  125. Saint-Louis, H. (2021). Understanding cancel culture: Normative and unequal sanctioning. Firstmonday, 26(7). http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5210/fm.v26i7.10891
  126. Sandlin, J. K., & Gracyalny, M. L. (2018). Seeking sincerity, finding forgiveness: YouTube apologies as image repair. Public Relations Review, 44(3), 393 406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.04.007
  127. Sanfilippo, M. R., Fichman, P., & Yang, S. (2018). Multidimensionality of online trolling behaviors. The Information Society, 34(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1391911
  128. Schlenker, B. R., & Darby, B. W. (1981). The use of apologies in social predicaments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(3), 271. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033840 
  129. Schubert, K. (2023). Democratization through “Cancel Culture”—Three levels of Artistic Freedom. In Politologische Aufklärung – konstruktivistische    Perspektiven (pp. 29–40). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40513-7_2
  130. Schumann, K., & Dragotta, A. (2020). Is moral redemption possible? The effectiveness of public apologies for sexual misconduct. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, 104002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104002
  131. Schweitzer, M. E., Hershey, J. C., & Bradlow, E. T. (2006). Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 101(1), 1 19. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.005
  132. Sest, N., & March, E. (2017). Constructing the cyber-troll: Psychopathy, sadism, and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.038  
  133. Sevenants, A., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2006). Does it Matter to be Pictured from Below?. Psychologica Belgica, 46(3), 199-210. DOI: 10.5334/pb-46-3-199
  134. Sienes, M. J. V., & Catan, J. E. C. (2021). The Speech Act of Apology by Filipino Call center agents. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(1), 117128. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22218
  135. Sifianou, M. (2012). Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of pragmatics, 44(12),1554-1564.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009
  136. Singh, A. (2021). Significant Study of Qualitative Research In Health Care. Available at SSRN 3788090. https://sciforum.net/paper/view/conference/9234
  137. Siregar, M. A. L., & Sinar, T. S. (2021). Visual Metafunction In Cigarette A Mild Advertisements: A Multimodal Analysis. LingPoet: Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research, 2(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.32734/lingpoet.v2i1.5256
  138. Song, S. C., Eslami, Z. R., & Galindo, K. B. (2018). Public apologies and intercultural communication: Perceptions of Chinese and American students. Intercultural Communication Education, 1(1), 27-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.29140/ice.v1n1.41
  139. Song, Y. (2024). I am Sorry and Sincere: A Case Study of Influencer Apology. English Language and Literature Studies, 14(4), 45. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v14n4p45
  140. Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 
  141. Moore, J. (2017). Performative face theory: A critical perspective on interpersonal identity work. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 258–276.      https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1315891 
  142. Taboada, M. (2015). Sentiment Analysis: An Overview from Linguistics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2(1), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevlinguistics-011415-040518
  143. Timothy Coombs, W., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). Amazon. com’s Orwellian nightmare: exploring apology in an online environment. Journal of Communication Management, 16(3), 280-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541211245758
  144. Tomlinson, E., Dineen, B., & Lewicki, R. J. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise.      Journal of Management, 30, 165–187. doi: doi:10.1016/ j.jm.2003.01.003
  145. Ulmer, R. R., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2006). Effective crisis communication: moving from crisis to  opportunity. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB16785264
  146. Uoti, K. (2022). Apology as a Speech Act Set: Apology strategies of social media influencers in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic (Doctoral dissertation,      Master’s Thesis, University of Turku]. UTUPub. https://urn.fi/ URN: NBN: fife2022042530307).
  147. Utz, S., Matzat, U., & Snijders, C. (2009). On-line peputation systems: The effects of feedback comments and reactions on building and rebuilding trust in on-line auctions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(3), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415130304
  148. Valentini, C., Romenti, S., Murtarelli, G., & Pizzetti, M. (2018). Digital visual engagement: influencing purchase intentions on Instagram. Journal of      communication management, 22(4), 362-381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-01-2018-0005
  149. Velasco, J. C. (2020). You are Cancelled: Virtual Collective Consciousness and      the Emergence of Cancel Culture as Ideological Purging. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in  Humanities, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s21n2
  150. Wahid, A. (2021) ‘You’re Cancelled!’, Kompas. Available at: https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2021/03/21/youre-canceled/  
  151. Wankhade, M., Rao, A. C. S., & Kulkarni, C. (2022). A survey on sentiment analysis methods, applications, and challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(7), 5731–5780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10144-1 Amankwaa, L. (2016). CREATING PROTOCOLS FOR TRUSTWORTHINESS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. PubMed, 23(3), 121 127. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29694754
  152. Ware, B. L., & Linkugel, W. A. (1973). They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of speech, 59(3), 273 283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383176
  153. White, K. M., Smith, J. R., Terry, D. J., Greenslade, J. H., & McKimmie, B. M.      (2008). Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in‐group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608x295207
  154. Wilson, A., Wilkes, S., Teramoto, Y., & Hale, S. (2023). Multimodal analysis of disinformation and misinformation. Royal Society Open             Science,      10(12). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230964
  155. Xu, S. (2017, October). Apology Strategies Employed by the Public Figures in the Open Letters of Chinese and English. In 7th International Conference on Management, Education, Information and Control (MEICI 2017) (pp. 189 193). Atlantis Press. doi:10.2991/meici-17.2017.41
  156. Xu, Z., & Yan, A. (2020). A Pragmatic Study of Image Restoration via Corporate Apology in Chinese Internet Corporations. English Language Teaching, 13(6), 76-88. doi: 10.5539/elt.v13n6p76
  157. Yadav, T. (2024). NAVIGATING CANCEL CULTURE: PR AND MARKETING TACTICS FOR BRAND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT. International Journal of Advanced Research, 12(10), 1104 1131. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/19732
  158. Yang, D., & Zhou, M. (2023). A Social Semiotic analysis of gender representations in Biology textbooks for upper secondary schools in China. Education as Change, 27. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/12791
  159. Yap, K., Kien, G., Chang, A., & Bell, K. (2022). A QUALITATIVE CASE STUDY OF CANCEL CULTURE AMONG PUBLIC FIGURES AND PRIVATE FIGURES (Doctoral dissertation, Master dissertation, California State University]. Scholar Works. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/concern/theses/pg15bm457  
  160. Yu, Z. (2023). Shot size narration in the mobile media era: characteristics and evolution. Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 2(11), 17-23. doi:10.56397/JRSSH.2023.11.04
  161. Yu, Z. (2023). Shot size narration in the mobile media era: characteristics and evolution. Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 2(11), 17-23.      doi:10.56397/JRSSH.2023.11.04
  162. Yuan, Y., & Guoyuan, T. (2022). An empirical study on imagery and emotional response in Chinese poetry translation—The visual grammar perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 872497. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872497
  163. Yuan, Y., & Guoyuan, T. (2022). An empirical study on imagery and emotional response in Chinese poetry translation—The visual grammar perspective. Frontiers in   Psychology, 13, 872497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872497
  164. Zhang, P. (2023). Visual Grammar in multimodal Discourse: A case study of Nezha’s poster images. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2019). https://doi.org/10.55060/s.atssh.230322.010
  165. Zhanghong, X., & Yanan, L. (2020). A pragmatic study of apologies posted on      Weibo by Chinese celebrities. International Journal of Literature and          Arts, 8(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20200802.14

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic