Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 25 no. 1 (2024)

The Mediating Effect of Stakeholders’ Involvement on the Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Learners’ Motivation

Estorina Tugade | Lyndon Quines | Geraldine Rodriguez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine the mediating effect of stakeholders involvement on the relationship between self-efficacy and learners motivation among the 228 Grade 5 learners and 120 stakeholders in 8 different school in Maitum East District namely: Kipalkuda Elementary School, Linao Elementary School, Maitum Elementary School, Malalag Central Elementary School SPED Center, Pangi Elementary School, Sison Elementary School, Virginia Tañedo Garcia Elementary School and Wali Integrated School for the school year 2022-2023. Slovin's formula was used to calculate the learners respondents and total enumeration for the stakeholders. Additionally, a non-experimental quantitative design utilizing the descriptive correlation technique was applied in this study. Based on the results of the study, the level of learners' self-efficacy was high in terms of student's engagement, classroom management, and instructional strategies. The level of learner's motivation was high in terms of self-motivation, intrinsic value, and cognitive strategy. The level of stakeholders' involvement was high in terms of school and budgeting, learners' participation, and implementation of school programs and reforms. Additionally, there was a significant relationship between self-efficacy and learner's motivation, self-efficacy and stakeholder's engagement, ad stakeholders engagement and learners' motivation. On the other hand, the data revealed a partial effect of self-efficacy and learners motivation self-efficacy and stakeholders involvement, and stakeholders involvement and learners motivation.



References:

  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., & Thomas, L. D. (2021). Circular economy ecosystems: A typology, definitions, and implications. Research Handbook of Sustainability Agency, 260-276. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906035.00024
  2. Abate, S. G., & Adamu, A. Y. (2022). Stakeholders’ participation in adult education programme development in Ethiopia. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2022.2052990
  3. Aboramadan, M., Dahleez, K., & Hamad, M. (2020). Servant leadership and academics’ engagement in higher education: Mediation analysis. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(6), 617-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1774036
  4. Adams, N., Little, T. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory. Development of self-determination through the life-course, 47-54. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_4
  5. Adams, D., Young, K., & Keen, D. (2019). Anxiety in children with autism at school: A systematic review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 6, 274-288. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40489-019-00172-z
  6. Adegoke, B. O., Alumona, C. J., Adeyemo, A. A., & Adeyinka, A. O. (2021). Flatfoot and balance performance among junior secondary school students in Ibadan, Nigeria. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.15619/NZJP/49.2.04
  7. Adhikari, G. P. (2021). Calculating the sample size in quantitative studies. Scholars' Journal, 14-29. http://surl.li/ictkhj
  8. Afzal, F., & Crawford, L. (2022). Student's perception of engagement in online project management education and its impact on performance: The mediating role of self-motivation. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100057
  9. Aggarwal, I., Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., & Malone, T. W. (2019). The impact of cognitive style diversity on implicit learning in teams. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00112
  10. Alam, A. (2021). Need-based perspective study of teachers’ work motivation as examined from self-determination theoretical framework: An empirical investigation. Available at SSRN 3771341. https://archives.palarch.nl /index.php/jae/article/view/2213
  11. Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. (2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018
  12. Aliyyah, R. R., Rasmitadila, R., Humaira, M. A., Mujahidin, E., Suryadi, S., Widyasari, W., & Rachmadtullah, R. (2020). Are the assessment criteria and the role of educational stakeholders able to make outstanding teacher. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. https://www.sc iencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S074756321930305X
  13. Anderman, E. M. (2020). Achievement motivation theory: Balancing precision and utility. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101864
  14. Ansley, B. M., Houchins, D., & Varjas, K. (2019). Cultivating positive work contexts that promote teacher job satisfaction and retention in high-need schools. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 32(1), 3-16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1274904
  15. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://www.tandfonline.com/ doi/abs/10.1080/01944366908977225
  16. Ashaye, O. R., & Irani, Z. (2019). The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.016
  17. Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., & Scheiter, K. (2020). Professional knowledge or motivation? Investigating the role of teachers’ expertise on the quality of technology-enhanced lesson plans. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300
  18. Baik, C., Larcombe, W., & Brooker, A. (2019). How universities can enhance student mental wellbeing: The student perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 674-687. https://www.tandfon line.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07294360.2019.1576596
  19. Barney, D. C., & Leavitt, T. (2019). A qualitative investigation of PE teachers perceptions of introductory/warm-up activities in k-12 PE. The Physical Educator, 76(1). https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2019-V76-I1-8445
  20. Barni, D., Danioni, F., & Benevene, P. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy: The role of personal values and motivations for teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01645
  21. Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Mouratidis, A., Katartzi, E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., & Vlachopoulos, S. (2018). Beware of your teaching style: A school-year long investigation of controlling teaching and student motivational experiences. Learning and Instruction, 53, 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.006
  22. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2022). Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 812-831. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs /10.1177/1741143220945706
  23. Black, J., Hashimzade, N., & Myles, G. (2012). A dictionary of economics. Oxford University Press, USA. https://www.amazon.com/Dictionary-Economics-Oxford-Quick-Reference/dp/0199696322
  24. Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. J. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 22(2), 27-30. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.738299924514584
  25. Brandenberger, C. C., Hagenauer, G., & Hascher, T. (2018). Promoting students’ self-determined motivation in maths: Results of a 1-year classroom intervention. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 295-317. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10212-017-0336-y
  26. Burić, I., & Kim, L. E. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101302
  27. Cardullo, V., Wang, C. H., Burton, M., & Dong, J. (2021). K-12 teachers’ remote teaching self-efficacy during the pandemic. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 14(1), 32-45. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JRIT-10-2020-0055/full/html
  28. Chamot, A. U., & Harris, V. (Eds.). (2019). Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and implementation (Vol. 132). Multilingual Matters.https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.21832/9781788923415/html
  29. Chan, K. K. H., & Hume, A. (2019). Towards a consensus model: Literature review of how science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge is investigated in empirical studies. Repositioning Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teachers’ Knowledge for Teaching Science, 3-76. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_1
  30. Chen, J., & Guo, W. (2020). Emotional intelligence can make a difference: The impact of principals’ emotional intelligence on teaching strategy mediated by instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 82-105. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full /10.1177/1741143218781066
  31. Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
  32. Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). A case study of immersive virtual field trips in an elementary classroom: Students’ learning experience and teacher-student interaction behaviors. Computers & Education, 140, 103600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103600
  33. Cheng, Y. C. (2022). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267980
  34. Cho, M. H., & Lee, H. (2017). Understanding of e-books among undergraduate students: Uses and preferences. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 10(2), 1-14. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/APJIE-05-2018-0028/full/html
  35. Choong, Y. O., Ng, L. P., Ai Na, S., & Tan, C. E. (2020). The role of teachers’ self-efficacy between trust and organisational citizenship behaviour among secondary school teachers. Personnel Review, 49(3), 864-886. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PR-10-2018-0434/ full/html
  36. Collie, R. J., Granziera, H., & Martin, A. J. (2019). Teachers' motivational approach: Links with students’ basic psychological need frustration, maladaptive engagement, and academic outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.002
  37. Conner, A. M. (2022). Actions of the principal: Influences on teacher self-efficacy and motivation. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/3689/
  38. Cooksey, R. W., & Cooksey, R. W. (2020). Descriptive statistics for summarising data. Illustrating Statistical Procedures: Finding Meaning in Quantitative Data, 61-139. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-2537-7_5
  39. Cruz, R. A., Manchanda, S., Firestone, A. R., & Rodl, J. E. (2020). An examination of teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(3), 197-214. https://journals.sag epub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0888406419875194
  40. Dakhi, O., Jama, J., & Irfan, D. (2020). Blended learning: A 21st century learning model at college. International Journal of Multi Science, 1(08), 50-65. https://multisciencejournal.com/index.php/ijm/article/view/92
  41. Dash, S. S., & Vohra, N. (2019). The leadership of the school principal: Impact on teachers’ job crafting, alienation and commitment. Management Research Review, 42(3), 352-369. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content /doi/10.1108/MRR-11-2017-0384/full/html
  42. Delfino, A. P. (2019). Student engagement and academic performance of students of Partido State University. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(1), n1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1222588
  43. Derbali, C., Elloumi, A., & Matoussi, F. (2017). The need to learn according to psycho-didactic approach: Self-determination and student’s performance in physical education realm. Creative Education, 8(07), 1155. https://www.scirp.org/html/11-6303578_77150.htm
  44. Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
  45. Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning—Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489-533. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0
  46. Dincer, A., Yeşilyurt, S., Noels, K. A., & Vargas Lascano, D. I. (2019). Self-determination and classroom engagement of EFL learners: A mixed-methods study of the self-system model of motivational development. Sage Open, 9(2), 2158244019853913. https://journals.sagepub .com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244019853913
  47. Doménech-Betoret, F., Gómez-Artiga, A., Abellán-Roselló, L., & Rocabert-Beút, E. (2020). MOCSE centered on students: Validation of learning demands and teacher support scales. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 582926. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582926/full
  48. Dornyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485893
  49. Duman, İ., Horzum, M. B., & Randler, C. (2020). Adaptation of the short form of the intrinsic motivation inventory to Turkish. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(3), 26-33. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/pes/issue/56971/802000
  50. Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481-496. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691618804166
  51. Engels, D., Haupt, C., Kugelmann, D., & Dethleffsen, K. (2021). The peer teachers’ perception of intrinsic motivation and rewards. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(4), 758-768. https://journals.physiology .org/doi/full/10.1152/advan.00023.2021
  52. Engin, G. (2020). An examination of primary school students' academic achievements and motivation in terms of parents' attitudes, teacher motivation, teacher self-efficacy and leadership Approach. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 257-276. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1244883
  53. Ennis, C. D. (2017). Educating students for a lifetime of physical activity: Enhancing mindfulness, motivation, and meaning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88(3), 241-250. https://www.tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10.1080/02701367.2017.1342495
  54. Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships in teachers’ professional work. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 397-406. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02607476.2018.1465669
  55. Erdemir, N., & Ekşi, G. Y. (2019). The perceptions of student teachers about using an online learning environment ‘Edmodo’in a ‘flipped classroom’. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 6(2), 174-186. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sduijes/issue/50325/638795
  56. Esra, M. E. Ş. E., & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 11-22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jetol/issue/60134/817680?utm_medium=email&utm_source=transaction
  57. Falqueto, J. M. Z., Hoffmann, V. E., Gomes, R. C., & Onoyama Mori, S. S. (2020). Strategic planning in higher education institutions: What are the stakeholders’ roles in the process?. Higher Education, 79, 1039-1056. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-019-00455-8
  58. Fathi, J., & Derakhshan, A. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy and emotional regulation as predictors of teaching stress: An investigation of Iranian English language teachers. Teaching English Language, 13(2), 117-143. https://www.teljournal.org/article_95883.html
  59. Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., & Bellés-Colomer, L. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting in higher education: An analysis of key internal stakeholders’ expectations. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(2), 313-336. https://www.emerald.com/insight/ content/doi/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2016-0116/full/html
  60. Fishbach, A., & Woolley, K. (2022). The structure of intrinsic motivation. Annual Review of Organizational. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091122
  61. Fithriani, R. (2021). The utilization of mobile-assisted gamification for vocabulary learning. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/id/eprint/18265
  62. Franklin, H., & Harrington, I. (2019). A review into effective classroom management and strategies for student engagement: Teacher and student roles in today’s classrooms. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i12.4491
  63. Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2019). Interventions for student engagement: Overview and state of the field. Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions, 1-11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/abs/pii/B9780128134139000012
  64. Freeman, R (2017). The relationship between extracurricular activities and academic achievement dissertations. https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/245
  65. Gaias, L. M., Johnson, S. L., Bottiani, J. H., Debnam, K. J., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2019). Examining teachers' classroom management profiles: Incorporating a focus on culturally responsive practice. Journal of School Psychology, 76, 124-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.07.017
  66. Geng, Y., Cheung, S. P., Huang, C. C., & Liao, J. (2022). Volunteering among Chinese College Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5154. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095154
  67. Georgii-Hemming, E., Johansson, K., & Moberg, N. (2020). Reflection in higher music education: What, why, wherefore?. Music Education Research, 22(3), 245-256. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/f ull/10.1080/14613808.2020.1766006
  68. Goldberg, P., Sümer, Ö., Stürmer, K., Wagner, W., Göllner, R., Gerjets, P. & Trautwein, U. (2021). Attentive or not? Toward a machine learning approach to assessing students’ visible engagement in classroom instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 27-49. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-019-09514-z
  69. Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R. (2019). Self-regulated learning: How parents can help children take personal responsibility for their learning. In Parent Involvement for Motivated Learners (pp. 83-103). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351021906-5/self-regulated-learning-alyssa-gonzalez-dehass
  70. Granziera, H., & Perera, H. N. (2019). Relations among teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs, engagement, and work satisfaction: A social cognitive view. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.003
  71. Grillo, M., & Kier, M. (2021). Why do they stay? An exploratory analysis of identities and commitment factors associated with teaching retention in high-need school contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103423
  72. Guay, F., Roy, A., & Valois, P. (2017). Teacher structure as a predictor of students’ perceived competence and autonomous motivation: The moderating role of differentiated instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12146
  73. Gustanti, Y., & Ayu, M. (2021). The correlation between cognitive reading strategies and students’ English proficiency test score. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 95-100. https://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/english-language-teaching/article/view /1452
  74. Hajovsky, D. B., Chesnut, S. R., & Jensen, K. M. (2020). The role of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs in the development of teacher-student relationships. Journal of School Psychology, 82, 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.09.001
  75. Halik, A., Hanafie Das, S. W., Dangnga, M. S., Rady, M., Aswad, M., & Nasir, M. (2019). Empowerment of school committee in improving education service quality at public primary school in Parepare City. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1956-1963. https://repository.iainpare .ac.id/id/eprint/1064/
  76. Handagoon, S., & Varma, P. (2019). The Influence of social support and student’s self efficacy on academic engagement of undergraduate students mediated by sense of belonging and psychological distress. Scholar: Human Sciences, 11(2), 135-135. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu /index.php/Scholar/article/view/3438
  77. Havik, T., & Westergård, E. (2020). Do teachers matter? Students’ perceptions of classroom interactions and student engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 488-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1577754
  78. Hepburn, L., Beamish, W., & Alston-Knox, C. L. (2021). Classroom management practices commonly used by secondary school teachers: Results from a Queensland survey. The Australian Educational Researcher, 48(3), 485-505. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13384-020-00402-y
  79. Hill, N. E., Witherspoon, D. P., & Bartz, D. (2018). Parental involvement in education during middle school: Perspectives of ethnically diverse parents, teachers, and students. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 12-27. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220671.2016.1190910
  80. Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S. (Eds.). (2020). Student engagement in the language classroom (Vol. 11). Multilingual Matters. https://www.amazon.com/Engagement-Language-Classroom-Psychology-Learning/dp/1788923596
  81. Holzberger, D., & Prestele, E. (2021). Teacher self-efficacy and self-reported cognitive activation and classroom management: A multilevel perspective on the role of school characteristics. Learning and Instruction, 76, 101513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101513
  82. Hsu, C.-L., & Ching, Y.-H. (2018). The effects of social media on college students. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 11(1), 1-14. https://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/mba_student/5/
  83. Hu, M., & Li, H. (2017). Student engagement in online learning: A review. In 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 39-43). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.17
  84. Huyer, L. D., Callaghan, N. I., Dicks, S., Scherer, E., Shukalyuk, A. I., Jou, M., & Kilkenny, D. M. (2020). Enhancing senior high school student engagement and academic performance using an inclusive and scalable inquiry-based program. Npj Science of Learning, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00076-2
  85. Igwenagu, C. (2016). Fundamentals of research methodology and data collection. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. https://www.researchgate .net/publication/303381524
  86. Ismail, I. A., Pernadi, N. L., & Febriyanti, A. (2022). How to grab and determine the size of the sample for research. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research (IJAAR), 6(9), 88-92. http://repository.unp.ac.id/41155/
  87. Jabri, U., Elihami, E., & Ibrahim, I. (2019). The effects of approach instruction on student’s reading performance. Jurnal Edukasi Nonformal, 1(1), 72-80. https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/JENFOL/article/view/191
  88. Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56, 303-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2
  89. Kasalak, G., & Dagyar, M. (2020). The relationship between teacher self-efficacy and teacher job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the teaching and learning international survey (TALIS). Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(3), 16-33. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1261816
  90. Katemliadis, I., & Markatos, G. (2021). Stakeholders' involvement in sustainability planning and implementation: The case of Cyprus. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes. https://www.emerald.com/insight /content/doi/10.1108/WHATT-07-2021-0095/full/html
  91. Katsantonis, I. G. (2019). Investigation of the impact of school climate and teachers’ self-efficacy on job satisfaction: A cross-cultural approach. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(1), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10010011
  92. Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of e-learning, 15(2), pp107-115. https://academic-publishing.org/index. php/ejel/article/view/1824
  93. Khan, T., Johnston, K., & Ophoff, J. (2019). The impact of an augmented reality application on learning motivation of students. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2019. https://www.hindawi.com/journa ls/ahci/2019/7208494/
  94. Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1-13. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w
  95. Knoke, D. (1999). Organizational networks and corporate social capital. In Corporate Social Capital and Liability. Boston, MA: Springer US. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4615-5027-3_2
  96. Krause, T. M., Ganduglia-Cazaban, C., Piller, L. B., & Venkataraman, V. (2018). Comparison of utilization of urgent care and primary care 2011-2015. Future Med Chem, 1(1), 1-2. https://www.oatext.com/comparison-of-utilization-of-urgent-care-and-primary-care-2011-2015.php
  97. Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder engagement: Past,present, and future. Business & Society, 00076503211066595.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00076503211066595
  98. Kwok, A. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ classroom management beliefs and associated teacher characteristics. Educational Studies, 47(5), 609-626. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03055698.2020.1717932
  99. Kwon, K., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sari, A. R., Khlaif, Z., Zhu, M., Nadir, H., & Gok, F. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy matters: Exploring the integration of mobile computing device in middle schools. TechTrends, 63, 682-692. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-019-00402-5
  100. Lai, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Learning strategies in self-directed language learning using mobile technology in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7749-7780. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-10945-5
  101. Lamon, S. J. (2020). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008057
  102. Lathifah, Z. K., Helmanto, F., & Maryani, N. (2020). The practice of effective classroom management in COVID-19 time. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 3263-3271. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fachri-Helmanto-2/publication/346649659_The_Practice_of_Effective_Classroom_Management_in_COVID-19_Time/links/5fcb922e299bf188d4f6f109/The-Practice-of-Effective-Classroom-Management-in-COVID-19-Time.pdf
  103. Lazarides, R., Watt, H. M., & Richardson, P. W. (2020). Teachers’ classroom management self-efficacy, perceived classroom management and teaching contexts from beginning until mid-career. Learning and Instruction, 69, 101346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101346
  104. Lepper, M. R., & Malone, T. W. (2021). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In Aptitude, learning, and instruction (pp. 255-286). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis .com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003163244-11/intrinsic-motivation-instruc tional-effectiveness-computer-based-education-mark-lepper-thomas-malo ne
  105. MacDonald, A., Clarke, A., Huang, L., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2019). Partner strategic capabilities for capturing value from sustainability-focused multi-stakeholder partnerships. Sustainability, 11(3), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030557
  106. Maier, A., Daniel, J., Oakes, J., & Lam, L. (2017). Community schools as an effective school improvement strategy: A review of the evidence. Learning Policy Institute. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED606765
  107. Manwaring, K. C., Larsen, R., Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Halverson, L. R. (2017). Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 35, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.002
  108. Marks, G. N., & O’Connell, M. (2021). Inadequacies in the SES–Achievement model: Evidence from PISA and other studies. Review of Education, 9(3), e3293. https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002 /rev3.3293
  109. Marshall, S. J. (2018). Internal and external stakeholders in higher education. In Shaping the University of the Future. Springer, Singapore. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-10-7620-6
  110. Marshman, E. M., Kalender, Z. Y., Nokes-Malach, T., Schunn, C., & Singh, C. (2018). Female students with A’s have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: A cause for alarm?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020123. https://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020123
  111. Martin, M. (2019). The implementation of school-based management in public elementary schools. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol9.no1.5.2019
  112. McCowan, T. (2019). Higher education for and beyond the sustainable development goals. Springer Nature. https://link.springer.com/book /10.1007/978-3-030-19597-7
  113. McDougle, S. D., & Taylor, J. A. (2019). Dissociable cognitive strategies for sensorimotor learning. Nature Communications, 10(1), 40. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07941-0
  114. Morais, P., Ferreira, M. J., & Veloso, B. (2021). Improving student engagement with Project-Based Learning: A case study in Software Engineering. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 16(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2021.3052677
  115. Moşteanu, N. R. (2021). Teaching and learning techniques for the online environment. how to maintain students’ attention and achieve learning outcomes in a virtual environment using new technology. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 4(4), 278-290. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9328311
  116. Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., Sánchez, J. Á. L., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students' satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608
  117. Myers, D., Freeman, J., Simonsen, B., & Sugai, G. (2017). Classroom management with exceptional learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(4), 223-230. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10. 1177/0040059916685064
  118. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
  119. Nappi, J. S. (2017). The importance of questioning in developing critical thinking skills. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 84(1), 30. https://www.dkg.is/static/ files/skjol_landsamband/bulletin_grein_jona.pdf#page=30
  120. Nasr, A. K., Kashan, M. K., Maleki, A., Jafari, N., & Hashemi, H. (2020). Assessment of barriers to renewable energy development using stakeholders approach. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2526. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(71)
  121. Nurlisa, N., Sada, C., & Ikhsanudin, I. (2020). Improving students' engagement using scaffolded role play and Facebook discussion. Journal of English as a Foreign Language Education (JEFLE), 1(2), 31-39. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/JEFLE/article/view/43749
  122. Osman, D. J., & Warner, J. R. (2020). Measuring teacher motivation: The missing link between professional development and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103064
  123. Özdemir, N. (2019). Principal leaderhip and students' achievement: Mediated pathways of professional community and teachers' instructional practices. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 16(1). http://surl.li/olxtjw
  124. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
  125. Patall, E. A., Pituch, K. A., Steingut, R. R., Vasquez, A. C., Yates, N., & Kennedy, A. A. (2019). Agency and high school science students' motivation, engagement, and classroom support experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 62, 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.01.004
  126. Pelikan, E. R., Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., Korlat, S., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: The role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393-418. https://link.springer.com/article /10.1007/s11618-021-01002-x
  127. Perera, H. N., Calkins, C., & Part, R. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy profiles: Determinants, outcomes, and generalizability across teaching level. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.006
  128. Perera, H. N., & John, J. E. (2020). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for teaching math: Relations with teacher and student outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101842
  129. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  130. Pressley, T., & Ha, C. (2021). Teaching during a pandemic: United States teachers' self-efficacy during COVID-19. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103465
  131. Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using learning media to increase learning motivation in elementary school. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53-60. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ej1244451
  132. Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers & Education, 143, 103682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682
  133. Rafiola, R., Setyosari, P., Radjah, C., & Ramli, M. (2020). The effect of learning motivation, self-efficacy, and blended learning on students’ achievement in the industrial revolution 4.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(8), 71-82. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217073/
  134. Rahman, M. S. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
  135. Rasmitadila, R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Tambunan, A., Khairas, E., & Nurtanto, M. (2020). The Benefits of Implementation of an Instructional Strategy Model Based on the Brain's Natural Learning Systems in Inclusive Classrooms in Higher Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(18), 53-72. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217880/
  136. Ray, K. N., & Miller, E. (2017). Strengthening stakeholder-engaged research and research on stakeholder engagement. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 6(4), 375-389. https://becarispublishing.com/doi/ full/10.2217/cer-2016-0096
  137. Reckwitz, A. (2020). The society of singularities. https://www.amazon.co. uk/Society-Singularities-Andreas-Reckwitz/dp/1509534229
  138. Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54-77. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. 1080/00461520.2020.1862657
  139. Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150-161. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702451
  140. Rudo, Z., & Dimock, V. (2017). How family, school, and community engagement can improve student achievement and influence school reform. http://surl.li/nkhcim
  141. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  142. Ryan, R. M., & Rigby, C. S. (2019). Motivational foundations of game-based learning. Handbook of game-based learning, 153-176. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-10545-006
  143. Salvioni, D. M., Franzoni, S., & Cassano, R. (2017). Sustainability in the higher education system: An opportunity to improve quality and image. Sustainability, 9(6), 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060914
  144. Savga, L., Krykliy, O., & Kyrychenko, K. (2018). The role of internal and external stakeholders in higher education system in ukraine. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.2(1).32-43.2018
  145. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. In Advances in Motivation Science (Vol. 8, pp. 153-179). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001
  146. Seeram, E. (2021). Quantitative and qualitative research: An overview of approaches. Research for Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 13-23. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-79956-4_2
  147. Seneviratne, K., Hamid, J. A., Khatibi, A., Azam, F., & Sudasinghe, S. (2019). Multi-faceted professional development designs for science teachers’ self-efficacy for inquiry-based teaching: A critical review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(7), 1595-1611. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070714
  148. Shin, M. H. (2018). Effects of project-based learning on students' motivation and self-efficacy. English Teaching, 73(1), 95-114. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1312282.pdf
  149. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
  150. Slemp, G. R., Field, J. G., & Cho, A. S. (2020). A meta-analysis of autonomous and controlled forms of teacher motivation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 121, 103459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103459
  151. Sprick, J., Sprick, R., Edwards, J., & Coughlin, C. (2021). CHAMPS: A proactive & positive approach to classroom management. Safe & Civil Schools. Ancora Publishing. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED615489
  152. Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice?. International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387-1407. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/ 10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983
  153. Swart, L. A., Kramer, S., Ratele, K., & Seedat, M. (2019). 2 Non-experimental research designs: Investigating the spatial distribution and social ecology of male homicide. Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 19, 19. https://doi.org/10.18772/22019032750.7
  154. Syarifuddin, H., & Atweh, B. (2022). The use of activity, classroom discussion, and exercise (ACE) Teaching cycle for improving students' engagement in learning elementary linear algebra. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 104-138. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1329228
  155. Talan, T., & Gulsecen, S. (2019). The effect of a flipped classroom on students’ achievements, academic engagement and satisfaction levels. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 31-60. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/article/640503
  156. Tokan, M. K., & Imakulata, M. M. (2019). The effect of motivation and learning behaviour on student achievement. South African Journal of Education, 39(1). DOI:10.15700/saje.v39n1a1510
  157. Tomas, L., Evans, N. S., Doyle, T., & Skamp, K. (2019). Are first year students ready for a flipped classroom? A case for a flipped learning continuum. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-019-0135-4
  158. Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Butz, A. R., & Rojas, J. P. (2019). Perseverant grit and self-efficacy: Are both essential for children’s academic success?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 877. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000324
  159. Van den Branden, K. (2019). Rethinking schools and renewing energy for learning: Research, principles and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351044318
  160. Viennet, R., & Pont, B. (2017). Education policy implementation: A literature review and proposed framework. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
  161. Vollet, J. W., Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A. (2017). In peer matters, teachers matter: Peer group influences on students’ engagement depend on teacher involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 635. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000172
  162. Vong, S. A., & Kaewurai, W. (2017). Instructional model development to enhance critical thinking and critical thinking teaching ability of trainee students at regional teaching training center in Takeo province, Cambodia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.05.002
  163. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). 35 years of research on students' subjective task values and motivation: A look back and a look forward. In Advances in motivation science (Vol. 7, pp. 161-198). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.05.002
  164. Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2021). Classroom management scripts: A theoretical model contrasting expert and novice teachers’ knowledge and awareness of classroom events. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 131-148. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-020-09542-0
  165. Yada, A., Tolvanen, A., Malinen, O. P., Imai-Matsumura, K., Shimada, H., Koike, R., & Savolainen, H. (2019). Teachers' self-efficacy and the sources of efficacy: A cross-cultural investigation in Japan and Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.014
  166. Zainuddin, Z., Haruna, H., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2019). A systematic review of flipped classroom empirical evidence from different fields: what are the gaps and future trends?. On the horizon. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OTH-09-2018-0027/full/html
  167. Zhang, S., & Liu, Q. (2019). Investigating the relationships among teachers’ motivational beliefs, motivational regulation, and their learning engagement in online professional learning communities. Computers & Education, 134, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.013
  168. Zarouk, M., Olivera, E., Peres, P., & Khaldi, M. (2020). The impact of flipped project-based learning on self-regulation in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(17), 127-147. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/218014/

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic