Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 25 no. 1 (2024)

Self-concept And Teaching Performance As Predictors Of Emotional Intelligence

Astrid Fano | Johnny Bantulo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study determined the level of self-concept and teaching performance as predictors of emotional intelligence of TLE teachers in Polomolok, South Cotabato. This study utilized descriptive-correlational design. The Slovin’s formula was used to get the desired sample size of 124. Stratified sampling was utilized so that everyone had the chance to be part of the study and to represent each school-respondent. In analyzing the data, the mean, Pearson Product Moment Correlation of Coefficient, and Multiple Regression Analysis were used. Based on the findings of the study, the level of self-concept of TLE teachers was high in terms of self-fulfilment, honesty, and emotional self-concept, while moderately high with regards to autonomy. Moreover, the level of teaching performance of TLE teachers was high in relation to the content knowledge and pedagogy, learning environment, assessment and reporting, community linkages and professional engagement, and personal growth and professional development, while moderately high in diversity of learners and curriculum and planning. Furthermore, the level of emotional intelligence of TLE teachers was very high in terms of social skills, while high in self-awareness, motivating oneself, and empathy while moderately high in terms of managing emotions. Additionally, there were significant relationships between self-concept and emotional intelligence, teaching performance and emotional intelligence of TLE teachers. Finally, the domain of self-concept that significantly predicted teachers’ emotional intelligence was emotional self-concept. On the other hand, the domain that best predicted teachers’ emotional intelligence regarding teaching performance was curriculum and planning.



References:

  1. Abiodullah, M., & Aslam, M. (2020). Emotional intelligence as a predictor of    teacher engagement in classroom. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(1), 127-140. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1258049
  2. Ahmad, S., Wasim, S., Irfan, S., Gogoi, S., Srivastava, A., & Farheen, Z. (2019). Qualitative v/s. quantitative research-a summarized review. population, 1(2), 2828-2832. http://surl.li/qghnak
  3. Alibakhshi, G., Nikdel, F., & Labbafi, A. (2020). Exploring the consequences of teachers’ self-efficacy: A case of teachers of English as a foreign language. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 23. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40862-020-00102-1
  4. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40(7), 64-65. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1850191
  5. Arens, K., Jansen, M., Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., & Brunner, M. (2021). The structure of academic self-concept: A methodological review and empirical illustration of central models. Review of Educational Research, 91(1), 34-72. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320972186
  6. Arghode, V., Lakshmanan, G., & Nafukho, M. (2022). Emotional intelligence, intercultural competence and online instruction: Review and reflection. European Journal of Training and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-05-2021-0064
  7. Bacon, W. A. (2001). An aesthetics of performance. Literature in Performance, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462938009365814
  8. Barnes, D. (2018). Practical curriculum study. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454721
  9. Bar-On, R. (1997). BarOn emotional quotient inventory (Vol. 40). Multi-health Systems. https://www.eitrainingcompany.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/eqi-133-resource.pdf
  10. Bragg, L. A., Walsh, C., & Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 104158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158
  11. Brennan, R. L. (Ed.). (2023). Educational measurement. Rowman & Littlefield. http://surl.li/wjugqq
  12. Chen, F., Garcia, F., Fuentes, C., Garcia-Ros, R., & Garcia, F. (2020). Self-concept in China: Validation of the Chinese version of the five-factor self-concept (AF5) questionnaire. Symmetry, 12(5), 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12050798
  13. Cooksey, R. W., & Cooksey, R. W. (2020). Measurement issues in quantitative research. Illustrating Statistical Procedures: Finding Meaning in Quantitative Data, 23-31. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-2537-7_2
  14. Cooper, C., & Travers, C. (2021). Teachers under pressure: Stress in the teaching profession. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Teachers-Under-Pressure-Stress-in-the-Teaching-Profession/Cooper-Cooper-Travers/p/book/9780415094849
  15. DepEd Order 2, S. 2015. Guidelines on the establishment and implementation of the Result-based Performance Management System (RPMS) in the Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/02/06/do-2-s-2015-guidelines-on-the-establishment-and-implementation-of-the-results-based-performance-management-system-rpms-in-the-department-of-education/
  16. Devos, C., Dupriez, V., & Paquay, L. (2021). Does the social working   environment    predict beginning teachers’ self-efficacy and feelings of      depression?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 206-217. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0742051X11001119
  17. Drigas, S., & Papoutsi, C. (2018). A new layered model on emotional intelligence. Behavioral Sciences, 8(5), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8050045
  18. Fiorilli, C., Benevene, P., De Stasio, S., Buonomo, I., Romano, L., Pepe, A., & Addimando, L. (2019). Teachers’ burnout: The role of trait emotional intelligence and social support. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02743
  19. Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158
  20. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books, Inc. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-98387-000
  21. Goñi, E., Madariaga, J. M., Axpe, I., & Goñi, A. (2011). Structure of the personal self-concept (PSC) questionnaire. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(3), 509-522. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/560/56019881006.pdf
  22. Hervie, M., & Winful, C. (2018). Enhancing teachers’ performance through training and development in Ghana education service (a case study of ebenezer senior high school). Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 1-8. https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648/j.jhrm.20180601.11
  23. Hunt, S. (2023). Starting to teach Latin. Bloomsbury Publishing. http://surl.li/ecdzwx
  24. Kim, L. E., & Burić, I. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy and burnout: Determining the directions of prediction through an autoregressive cross-lagged panel model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(8), 1661. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000424
  25. Kusumaningrum, E., Sumarsono, B., & Gunawan, I. (2019). Professional ethics and teacher teaching performance: Measurement of teacher empowerment with a soft system methodology approach. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(4), 611-624.https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol5iss4/Pt_2/54216_Kusumaningrum_2019_E_R.pdf
  26. Maksimović, J., & Osmanović, J. S. (2019). Teachers’ self-concept and its benefits for science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(1), 98-107.
  27. Marsh, W., & Martin, J. (2021). Academic self‐concept and academic   achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational   Psychology, 81(1), 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X503501
  28. Marsh, W., Pekrun, R., Parker, D., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, K.        (2019). The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy:         beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 331. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2018-30631-001
  29. McArthur, M., Filardi, N., Francis, A., Boyes, E., & Badcock, A. (2020). Self-    concept in poor readers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ, 8, e8772. https://peerj.com/articles/8772/
  30. McLachlan, C., Fleer, M., & Edwards, S. (2018). Early childhood curriculum: Planning, assessment and implementation. Cambridge University Press. http://surl.li/edmjhm
  31. Mérida-López, S., Sánchez-Gómez, M., & Extremera, N. (2020). Leaving the teaching profession: Examining the role of social support, engagement and   emotional intelligence in teachers’ intentions to quit. Psychosocial             Intervention, 29(3), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2020a10
  32. Millner, A. J., Robinaugh, D. J., & Nock, M. K. (2020). Advancing the understanding of suicide: The need for formal theory and rigorous descriptive research. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 704-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.007
  33. Möller, J., Zitzmann, S., Helm, F., Machts, N., & Wolff, F. (2020). A meta-analysis      of relations between achievement and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 376-419. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320919354
  34. Mortiboys, A. (2018). Teaching with emotional intelligence: A step-by-step guide for higher and further education professionals. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806463
  35. Mustafa, B., Nordin, B., Razzaq, A., & bin Ibrahim, B. (2020). Vocational college teachers in Malaysia: Emotional intelligence. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(9), 5099-5106. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/4746
  36. Nguyen, T., White, S., Hall, K., & Bell, R. (2019). Emotional intelligence and    managerial communication. American Journal of Management, 19(2), 54-     63. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3737206
  37. Penrose, A., Perry, C., & Ball, I. (2019). Emotional intelligence and teacher self-efficacy: The contribution of teacher status and length of experience. Issues in Educational Research, 17(1), 107-126. http://www.iier.org.au/iier17/penrose.html
  38. Rahman, M. S. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
  39. Ren, H. (2020). Withdrawn: Heuristic fuzzy logic approach for analyzing the effects of emotional intelligence in teachers' teaching quality and teamwork in dance training institutions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 101537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101537
  40. Roche, A., & Marsh, W. (2020). Multiple dimensions of university teacher self-concept. Instructional Science, 28(5), 439-468. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1026576404113
  41. Rogers, C. R. (1959). A tentative scale for the measurement of process in psychotherapy. In E. A. Rubinstein & M. B. Parloff (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10036-006
  42. Safina, M., Arifullina, U., Ganieva, M., & Katushenko, A. (2020). Emotional intelligence in teachers’ activities. Journal of History Culture and Art        Research, 9(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i2.2677
  43. Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
  44. Skordoulis, M., Liagkis, K., Sidiropoulos, G., & Drosos, D. (2020). Emotional intelligence and workplace conflict resolution: The case of secondary           education teachers in Greece. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(4), 521-533. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1271240
  45. Swart, L. A., Kramer, S., Ratele, K., & Seedat, M. (2019). Non-experimental research designs: Investigating the spatial distribution and social ecology of male homicide. Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 19, 20-35. https://doi.org/10.18772/22019032750.7
  46. Tejada, J. J., & Punzalan, J. R. B. (2012). On the misuse of Slovin’s formula. The Philippine Statistician, 61(1), 129-136. https://www.psai.ph/docs/publications/tps/tps_2012_61_1_9.pdf
  47. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (2019). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57-70. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/a:1003548313194
  48. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A.W. (2021). Ohio state teacher efficacy scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037/t11400-000
  49. Turner, K., & Stough, C. (2020). Pre-service teachers and emotional intelligence: A scoping review. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(2), 283-305. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13384-019-00352-0
  50. Valente, S., Monteiro, P., & Lourenço, A. (2019). The relationship between teachers’ emotional intelligence and classroom discipline management. Psychology in the Schools, 56(5), 741-750. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22218
  51. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Baska, A. (2021). Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners. Routledge. https://www.everand.com/book/438101194/Curriculum-Planning-and-Instructional-Design-for-Gifted-Learners
  52. Wamsler, C., & Restoy, F. (2020). Emotional intelligence and the sustainable development goals: Supporting peaceful, just, and inclusive societies. Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, 1-11. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-71066-2_123-1
  53. Watling, C. J., & Ginsburg, S. (2019). Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Medical Education, 53(1), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13645
  54. Wu, H., Guo, Y., Yang, Y., Zhao, L., & Guo, C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the longitudinal relationship between academic self-concept and academic achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1749-1778. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-021-09600-1
  55. Wu, Y., Lian, K., Hong, P., Liu, S., Lin, M., & Lian, R. (2019). Teachers' emotional intelligence and self-efficacy: Mediating role of teaching performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(3),  1-10. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7869
  56. Zahid, M., & Khanam, A. (2019). Effect of reflective teaching practices on the performance of prospective teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 18(1), 32-43. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1201647
  57. Zepeda, S. J. (2019). Professional development: What works. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315386744
  58. Zurita-Ortega, F., Olmedo-Moreno, M., Chacón-Cuberos, R., Expósito López, J., & Martínez-Martínez, A. (2020). Relationship between leadership and emotional intelligence in teachers in universities and other educational centres: A structural equation model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010293

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic