HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 49 no. 3 (2025)

The Effects of a Flipped Classroom Teaching Method Integrated with a Collaborative Learning Model on Students’ Learning Performance in Genetics

Noneza Cadungog

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Difficulties in mastering complex Genetics concepts persist among senior high school learners, prompting the need for innovative pedagogical approaches beyond traditional lecture-based instruction. This study investigated the effects of the flipped classroom teaching method integrated with a collaborative learning model on the learning performance of STEM Grade 11 students in Genetics at Notre Dame of Midsayap College. Employing a quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent control and experimental groups, the control group was taught using the traditional deductive method. In contrast, the experimental group received flipped classroom instruction incorporating collaborative activities. Both groups took a pre-test to establish baseline comparability and a post-test to measure learning gains. Results revealed that the flipped classroom, integrated with a collaborative learning model, was rated “very high” in implementation, with teacher guidance, student motivation, and the accessibility of pre-class materials identified as key strengths. Post-test scores of the experimental group (M = 86.40) were significantly higher than those of the control group (M = 78.15), with a larger mean gain (14.60 vs. 5.80) and a large effect size (d = 1.92), indicating substantial improvement in student performance. These findings suggest that the flipped classroom, combined with collaborative learning, is more effective than traditional methods in enhancing academic achievement, fostering active engagement, and developing critical thinking in Genetics. The results further affirm the importance of innovative, student-centered instructional models in advancing Sustainable Development Goal 4 – Quality Education.



References:

  1. Abbas, M., Onu, J. E., Farouk, K., Mohammed, A., Gadzama, A. A., & Usman, A. (2024). Flipped classroom and achievement in genetics concepts among secondary students. FNAS-JMSE.
  2. Acido, M., & Caballes, R. (2024). Philippine performance in PISA 2018 and 2022: Implications for science instruction.
  3. Alaagib, N. A., Musa, M. E., & Saeed, A. M. (2019). Medical students’ perception of lecture-based teaching. Sudan Journal of Paediatrics, 19(1), 13–18.
  4. Bisin, G., & Sumayo, M. (2024). Technology-enhanced pedagogies in Philippine education.
  5. Buhl-Wiggers, J., Holm, L. B., & Christensen, M. (2023). A randomized controlled trial of flipped classroom instruction in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.
  6. Cadiz, R., Salvador, J., & Delos Reyes, A. (2024). Rethinking traditional instructional practices in Philippine classrooms. [Journal Name].
  7. Edar, J., Ramos, D., & Peña, L. (2024). Alignment of instructional strategies with contemporary learner needs in the Philippines. [Journal Name].
  8. Gogo, J. (2024). Instructional innovation and learner engagement in STEM classrooms.
  9. Holm, L. B., et al. (2022). The FLIPPED STEP study: A randomized controlled trial in statistics and epidemiology. Journal of Educational Practice, 15(3), 45–62.
  10. Hu, X., Liu, Q., & Wang, D. (2024). The impact of lecture-dominated classrooms on student engagement in China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education.
  11. Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., Törmänen, T., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. (2020). Designing for socially shared regulation of learning in science classrooms. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1–15.
  12. Jung, J., Lee, M., & Park, S. (2022). Self-regulation and learner responsibility in flipped classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 25(4), 112–124.
  13. Lam, C. P., et al. (2024). Flipped classroom in science education: Correlates of student attitudes and learning factors. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
  14. Magas, R. (2023). TIMSS 2019 results and implications for science performance in the Philippines. Philippine Education Review.
  15. Naing, C., et al. (2023). Effects of flipped classroom for health professional students: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education.
  16. Nnorom, N., & Okwutu, S. (2025). Simulation-aided flipped model and its effects on achievement and interest in Genetics. GPH-Education and Research, 3(1), 55–67.
  17. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 country notes: Philippines. OECD Publishing.
  18. Samarasekera, D., et al. (2018). Instructional design for learner-focused outcomes. International Journal of Instructional Pedagogy.
  19. Sanjito, B. P., & Hyams-Ssekasi, D. (2025). The impact of science practical work on secondary students’ outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education.
  20. Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on achievement. Computers & Education, 103819.
  21. Sulla, F., et al. (2023). Teacher support and socially shared regulation: A systematic review. Frontiers in       Psychology, 14, 112–129.
  22. Vega, A. (2024). Innovative tools and strategies in STEM pedagogy.
  23. Wang, X., Chen, L., & Zhang, H. (2024). Lecture-driven science classrooms and student disengagement. International Journal of Science Education.
  24. Wright, E., & Park, J. (2022). Contextual effectiveness of flipped learning across disciplines. Educational       Research Review, 36, 100–115.
  25. Yaşar, M. D., et al. (2024). Evaluation of cooperative learning in science education: A mixed-meta study (2001–2022). Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education.